It has been reported by family members that Ruth Bader-Ginsburg did not retire during the Obama Administration because she wanted Hillary to appoint a replacement. She was already advanced in age with several bouts of cancer behind her. Apparently she was very confident that Hillary would win. In this, she probably could be forgiven; as the correct people were all confident that she would. Trump had almost no newspaper endorsements or endorsements of any kind from people/institutions that mattered. But he won, which should have made the liberal types examine their assumptions, but apparently little of such ever happened.
Here is a question: how important would it be to have you Supreme Court seat appointed by a woman? Is there some super extra amount of pride there? Is it about being on stage with the first woman president as it happens? Perhaps there is something to this.
But consider what was at stake. The lefty types try to make Supreme Court into a Supra-Legislature, where an unelected body makes dictates that the country must follow. In reality, the Supreme Court is supposed to accountable to the Constitution, but for the lefty side, this Constitution is living breathing and whatever they want it to be. The way of operating is a big-time aspect of their nefarious plans, perhaps even the cornerstone, as their ideas are normally too stupid to be enacted by legislative means.
Why risk it? Is the shining moment of pride worth that? Considering it further, would any self-respecting person want to be on stage with Hillary? Bill never seems comfortable with it; something that many can understand. Perhaps I am reaching here, but it seems that fellas are more about get-R-done and less about ceremonies. Is it the guys who are into weddings? Was it a man who presented Luke and Han with medals? Tell if you agree or disagree.
Exit question — Was Han employing ZFG to capture Leia?