Another major reason for the pushback is that the manosphere has identified some very unseemly, unsavory truths about female nature, female sexual behavior, female attraction, and women in general.
Women don’t like it when people figure them out. Women don’t like getting called out on their unseemly behavior. Women don’t like the truth about them being exposed. Women don’t like this because it makes it much more difficult for them to use “soft power”: manipulation, deceit, fraud, sabotage, and subversion.
Sorry to pick on a regular, but our dear Bloom is a perfect example. Time and time again, she writes with a quintessential “but.. but… but… I just don’t get it….” look on her face. An even better example is HUS 2.0 near the end, when women ran screaming from the room every time the dark underbellies of their sexual natures were discussed. Giggles and her girls just couldn’t take being faced with their own crap.
The problem is that women’s behaviors have become so flagrant, blatant, brazen, and in-your-face, that they simply cannot be denied or ignored anymore. And women can no longer explain them with a straight face.
Here’s one of the dirty little secrets, though: men have been known to do the same thing. Feminism has always been a reaction to the top men overplaying their hands too, and lesser men emulating those behaviors. Raping, beating, and killing women. Divorcing women, taking the kids and all the money, and throwing them out into the street. Woman won’t fuck me? Divorce her and kick her to the curb with nothing but the clothes on her back. Put that Scarlet Letter on that hussy, and make her a social pariah! The social ostracism and approbation accompanying “spinster” status.
And even worse…. unattractive men were allowed to act like that too, but to a lesser extent. Why, they had sex with their wives! Why, they EXPECTED to have sex with their wives! And if their wives wouldn’t have sex with them, they either divorced them, or paid a hooker every so often! They walked around in “wife beaters” in their Brooklyn apartments and demanded that their wives take care of their homes, make their food, raise their children, and bring them a beer!
Well, it was decided that men just went too far with all that. Men overplayed their hands. Plus, women decided that although being married to an icky beta was kind of ok, it was better to have her own job so that she could have hot fun sex with hot fun men. That way she didn’t have to be accountable to an icky beta and certainly would NEVER have to have sex with an icky beta.
And where are we now? Now, it’s women who have overplayed their hands and turned men into the trod upon, shit-upon sex. Women had it good during the “oppressive” “patriarchy”. But they’re doing to men now what they have projected and believed men did to women. It’s as if women’s ideas of “patriarchy” are based on watching “Last Exit to Brooklyn”, “All in the Family”, and “Tender Mercies”. All men are either brutes, buffoons, closeted gay men overcompensating, or emotionally stunted mentally ill wrecks ready to explode on the first woman who looks askance at them.
It’s just insane, it really is. Clown World.
Yes, this is a big sin of the Manosphere, to identify some very unseemly, unsavory truths about female nature. One that is unforgivable when given due consideration. For Feminism utilizes the implied moral superiority, the not being dumb brutes concept of what a person should be for the justification of much of what they do.
Right here is a large reason why the Manosphere will never be allowed to get any traction, why it will be opposed with all force possible. For the moral superiority of Feminisms’s position can never be challenged, otherwise it will fall like a house of cards.
This is one big reason why motivated people should continue to contribute their effort to writing and commenting; to keep pressure on the house of cards, leading to where it may.
Dalrock happened to write a related post