Over at RPG’s, Earl writes,
If all the changes over the past forty or so years haven’t led to a better, happier life for women (or men or kids), where do we go from here?’
Feminism for women is like socialism for Marxists…we just haven’t done it right yet or men have continued to screw it up yet so we need to double and triple down on it. If we just give women unlimited rights to do whatever they want and remove all bad feels and consequences of their actions…they will finally be happy. And if you think this is an impossiblity that’s just evil mansplaining talking.
It won’t go away until the herd reverts back to the way God set things up…but that starts with humility.
Any effective social system must take into account human nature; that very complex often contradictory manner in which people operate. To make things work, often there must be compromises such that the people of the system get much of what they desire. If you don’t have this, then you might have such things a sefdom, slavery, third world kleptocracies, etc.
Feminism, like most every other ism, fails this test. Let us examine this more closely. Ostensibly it is all about equality, except for the obvious differences in plumbing that can’t be ignored. The basic premise is that men and women are the same, so they should fit into society in the same manner.
Well, they are not the same, especially in terms of their human nature. Women have certain pre-dispositions that men do not have, and vice-versa. These are not trivial differences, they are game-changing differences. The impact of these differences have been projected upon society through Feminism; upsetting the effective social system where once again, most obtained much of what they desired. Here are some examples women’s base desires being set free,
II. The Feminine Imperative
V. Control over emasculated men, though in reality women want to be dominated. It is as if there was a Society Wide Shit Test.
It goes on (and on). These new rights/privileges are driven by women’s human nature; it just seems that they do poorly in the long run when driven so. Apparently it is right and proper to ignore this.
So we have a new social system. Women and their male allies have changed the rules. Though women thought they would be happy, they are not. Some men are content, some are happy, many are meh. The children suffer.
This new “compromise” seems to not deliver much of what its participants want. So as Earl states, clearly it is time to double down on it; human nature be damned.