Church Ladies

Dalrock has addressed this article from Kevin Williamson.  Now it is my turn.

It is suggested that a fine place for incels to find a good woman in is church.

There are girls who want to go home with a guy they met at a bar, but, as many of you no doubt have discovered, you are not that guy. And if you were going to be that guy, you’d be him by now. The sexual revolution, like any revolution, has its cruelties. As Ross Douthat put it in the New York Times, “Like other forms of neoliberal deregulation the sexual revolution created new winners and losers, new hierarchies to replace the old ones, privileging the beautiful and rich and socially adept in new ways and relegating others to new forms of loneliness and frustration.” So maybe just cross the club off your list. On the other hand, there are girls who want to date — and marry — a guy they met in church. You know where you find those girls? 


Most congregations — and practically every church committee that doesn’t have the word “men” in its title — are lopsidedly female. Maybe what gets those ladies out of bed on a Sunday morning is fire in the soul. But it’s a safe bet that some of them are there, at least in part, for the same reason you are: They are alone, and they do not want to be. And they don’t want to say “We hooked up after knocking down six Mango Madness Margaritas apiece at happy hour at Bennigan’s” when their parents and friends ask where they met. “We met at church” is a better opening chapter.

I sure wish this was true.  I wish that I could recommend this approach whole-heartedly. Unfortunately, there are issues.

First, I will give the Deti perspective.  The women in church are much like all other modern women.  They want the tingles; they want everything else.  Even though they may act in a virtuous manner, they are secretly getting hammered by Harley McBadboy.   There is probably much truth to this; as we have seen modern women expect their tingles (and at any cost).  Some of the single church ladies might not presently being hammered by Harley McBadboy, but they do wish that they had the tingles experienced by the women who were.  Short answer — tingles they want, either now or later (or both).

The typical young men in church are not the tingle generators.  Part of this might be due to the fact that most young men do not generate tingles in hypergamous women, and part of it might be due to the fact that the church has taught them to be nice guys (i.e. acquiesce to everybody else’s whim).  This is not a good start, one that is almost never overcome.  One time that we saw it overcome was with Joseph of Jackson and the transformation of his men’s group.  Naturally enough, they were were all ridden out of town.

Let us talk more about the young single church ladies.  First I will describe what they should be, and then tell how they fall short.  A primary aspect of Christianity is humility, to realize that we have a sin nature and that we must always work to overcome it.  This is humbling.  Fellas learn this all throughout their lives; they must scrap for what they get; so there is not really a problem there. My older sisters were versed in humility as girls.  I saw it happen.  I did not understand at time why this was happening; but I do now.  They were being prepared for the upcoming years when they would have so very much unearned power.  The notions of humility was to keep them in check, to temper their hypergamy, to make them understand that they were not all that.  Moreover, it was to prepare them for a lifetime of where they would not be catered to as they might be in their most attractive years.

The modern single church ladies have been doused in self esteem from every direction.  They want what all the other women want, but perhaps with a more righteous edge.  There is no way that the current crop of men, or any crop of men, could satisfy them.  I noticed this when I was a young man.  So I never really bothered with them.  In church – not in church, it really didn’t seem to matter.

My Mom, who was taught humility in her youth, really could not understand my attitude.  But the young church ladies were not the same as in her youth.  They were demanding, and expected that their demands would be met.  Now, and after marriage.  I knew that this would lead to unhappiness and divorce.  A few years ago, I went to a charity dinner back in the town I grew up in.  There was an older lady there asking me questions.  When she found out that I was single, she immediately tried to direct me to her church where she stated that there were lots of single women.  It was no sale.

In some ways, church women are worse than their secular cousins.  They often have a sense of superiority and righteousness; while the secular women know what they are and deal with it in their own way.

Short answer — the lack of humility in young women sink them as possible wives.  So much of their issues flow from this.

Disclaimer: Not all church women are like what is described above.  There is a spectrum of course.  Though it sure would be great if one could easily differentiate the good from the bad.

Posted in alpha fux, alpha fux beta bux, beta bux, Dating????, FarmBoy, Feminism, Hypergamy, Lies, Marriage, Trainwreck
116 comments on “Church Ladies
  1. Farm Boy says:

    Being set up to fail the young men are.

    Being set up to fail the young women are.

    Liked by 5 people

  2. earl says:

    ‘In some ways, church women are worse than their secular cousins. They often have a sense of superiority and righteousness; while the secular women know what they are and deal with it in their own way.’

    Nah they are equally terrible. They both think they are superior and righteous because feminism brainwashes them into thinking woman is good and man is evil. The only difference between a church feminist and a secular feminist is that a church feminist thinks her feminist theology is from God and a secular feminist thinks her lifestyle is to correct an injustice from the evil patriarchy.

    ‘When she found out that I was single, she immediately tried to direct me to her church where she stated that there were lots of single women.’

    And nobody ever asks why….could it be because they don’t want to get married?

    Liked by 2 people

  3. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    I am going to get you and Earl mad at me for saying this, but in my days of internet dating, the ones that would postpone sex till after marriage very likely would not be interested in having it then. I don’t have to tell who comprised this group. The way I see it, this is fraud on a grand scale.
    In the previous thread, I did point out that single women in church will reject men with the excuse that they don’t want the whole congregation knowing that they are seeing each other. That does go a long way to killing church as a venue.
    Finally, while secular women have hamsters, church women have hamsters on steroids.
    If I had a solution to this dilemma for men, I would be happy to share it. I have no idea where to find motivated women. As Roosh points out, they are all acting like their pipeline is full.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. earl says:

    ‘I am going to get you and Earl mad at me for saying this, but in my days of internet dating, the ones that would postpone sex till after marriage very likely would not be interested in having it then.’

    That doesn’t make me mad…I’m aware that’s a very real possibility. The feminist ethos ruins women in many different ways.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    “Being set up to fail the young men are.
    Being set up to fail the young women are.”

    I have more hope for the boys. They know that something is wrong. The problem is that it doesn’t lie with them.


  6. earl says:

    ‘If I had a solution to this dilemma for men, I would be happy to share it.’

    There’s avoiding them altogether and doing your own thing.
    There’s going along with the feminist ethos with dangerous results.
    There’s punishing them for going with the feminist ethos.
    You could further you relationship with the Lord first and if you want pray He spares you a unicorn. But I wouldn’t get mad if that doesn’t happen.

    Other than that I have no idea how to get rid of the feminist virus in our midst. I mean how do you overcome this???

    Liked by 1 person

  7. earl says:

    ‘ They know that something is wrong. The problem is that it doesn’t lie with them.’

    They need to know that…because they are going to get a big dose of the problem being them because they are male. They need to see it’s the women who have the problem and are projecting it onto men.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I would like to further my relationship, but I am reminded of Christ’s statement that God loves sinners. It would seem to be at the expense of the virtuous.


  9. earl says:

    You are aware everyone is a sinner, right? The self-righteous who don’t think they are sinners are the ones He isn’t too fond of.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I wasn’t exaggerating about the women not wanting sex. Of the three five times divorced women that I met online, the one that claimed to be a Christian, wanted to hold off sex till after marriage and wanted the engagement to last a year. She found someone. However, she did tell me that one of the guys that she corresponded with had married and got the “sex is for kids” talk later.


  11. earl says:

    Five time divorced ‘Christian’ woman that wanted to keep sex in marriage????

    She might want to look up adultery.

    I think your problem stemmed from the fact they were divorced. Those women wouldn’t even be worth an interest in my book.

    I’m talking about the never married ladies…are they keeping sex until marriage so that only their husband gets it or because they are frigid and use that excuse to not ever have sex?


  12. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I could only talk to the ones that talked to me. It was kind of a shock to see what is out there and that they command the sexual marketplace. I will say that of the five times divorced ladies, the Wiccan had a stronger moral character than the Christian.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. earl says:

    ‘the Wiccan had a stronger moral character than the Christian.’

    Divorced women and witches…man you are scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to internet dating.

    Not that there are that much in the way of better options out there, but if you know they’ve already iced their husband or subscribe to witchcraft (a subset of goddess worship nonsense) they aren’t worth your time.


  14. earl says:

    Although what was it about the Wiccan where she had stronger moral character? She actually followed her ethos?


  15. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    We had to break up. She was taking care of her mother at home and couldn’t leave her alone for the time for us to have lunch once every two weeks.She did follow and live within their code.
    You have reminded me why I haven’t signed on to my online accounts in years. It is easy to fall back on the concept of AWALT.


  16. mgtowhorseman says:

    EARL! Seriously Dude!

    Eyebleach warning!

    Is it too much to ask??


  17. mgtowhorseman says:

    And in say ten years she wants to go back to the long haired blonde look to save what is left of her fading pretty…

    The stars and neck tattooes!!


    Ruined For LIFE!!!!


  18. earl says:

    Probably for the best…while I’m not sure if Wiccans hate men on the scale of feminists…they do have a lot of the ‘goddess within’ nonsense.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. mgtowhorseman says:


  20. earl says:

    I used to do the online dating thing back in my young, dumb days mainly on the Catholic dating site. Even there I’d see quite a bit of divorced, single mothers, and women who said they were Catholic but pointed out the things they didn’t agree with the faith. I get church isn’t going to be the safe haven where you find feminine submissive women that are still pure and working on child caring and homemaking skills.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. earl says:

    Red had plenty of good lines.


  22. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    She did it to herself. It is like she is raising the middle finger to the sexual marketplace, presuming that women are immune.


  23. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Motivated women are pretty thin on the ground.


  24. earl says:

    Assuming that’s the same woman (one never knows with the internet)…she went from a definite yes to…I need a torch to keep that creature away from me.


  25. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I think you would need all the tools that Van Helsing carried.


  26. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I thought that it might be good for women to read this post and thread, but, even if they did, they would chalk it up to men being bitter. They have no idea and don’t want to know.


  27. earl says:

    Granted Roissy isn’t tops on my list…but the blog did address the uglifying behavior that feminism brings out in women.

    ‘It would be as if mark zuckerberg threw away his billions, his houses, his cars, and drove his company into bankruptcy…..

    hm wait, it kind of is still like that for him.

    Speculating, I offer the following explanations for uglifying behavior that seems to defy the Darwinian Directive.

    -fatherlessness, weak fathers, slutty mothers, and supplicating millennial males.
    -burned by a jerkboy lover, the embrace of ugliness “protects” these girls from getting burned again
    -disgusted by cloying beta males, the ugliness likewise “protects” the girls from “creeps”
    -basic bitch misandry (“i hate men so i will deprive them of their greatest pleasure: pretty girls”)
    -experimental lesbianism that went too far
    -feminist brainwashing by evil professors filling her head with garbage
    -and finally, don’t underestimate the impact that shifting cultural mores can have on individual behavior: the culture inculcates rabid man-hate and toxic grrlpower. it shouldn’t surprise that marginal, weak-willed chicks heed the agitprop and conform to the new norms.
    -F YOU DAD
    -you know how some men have a fear of success because success means they have to abandon their excuses and rationalization for inaction? feminism disfigurement could be similar for women: a fear of romantic success because they don’t want to abandon their excuses and rationalizations for failing to secure a man in a committed relationship.

    Ironsides looks on the bright side,

    ‘They’re revealing their inner selves as a warning for those who observe the world with a trace of sanity.

    In doing so, they’re most likely removing themselves from the genetic future of our race.

    This is a good thing. More power to them. The monster within has decided to show itself outwardly as well.’


  28. earl says:

    Another one…although I can’t say I pity her.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Yoda says:

    I thought that it might be good for women to read this post and thread, but, even if they did, they would chalk it up to men being bitter.

    Probably one reason why Farm Boy writes with a mostly detached analytical style he does.
    Nullifies this claim it would

    Liked by 3 people

  30. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    That is Rose McGowan. I definitely prefer the “before”. As for the explanations, what is left out Is the one that they can do all this to themselves and still have what they want from the marketplace. It is hard to believe that men are that thirsty. When Trigglypuff was news, her OkCupid profile was found. From reading it, I could conclude that she as getting more action than most men, while she listed herself as a lesbian.
    There is something very wrong going on and it may not be thirsty men.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I don’t think that will help women listen to truth they don’t want to hear.

    Looking again at the before and after pictures of Rose McGowan, something very sick is affecting American women.


  32. earl says:

    Rose before the virus got in was a very pretty woman. She did date that freak Marilyn Manson for a while and I know he was trying to go the androgynous route.

    I don’t know what combination of the cocktail of mind altering meds, lesbianism, feminism, witchcraft, promiscuity, and the like has done to these women but it’s clearly making them really ill.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. earl says:

    Well I’ll never be thirsty enough to resort to a feminist transitioning to a lesbian. I’d rather die of dehydration.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. earl says:

    I liked this comment on the women turned feminist piece…

    ‘Dicks, drugs and Domino’s will do this to you. At least they’re honest enough to let you know from the get go where they stand. Many girls pretend to be wholesome but conceal hardcore feminist beliefs. The former are elephants…huge, ugly and easy to notice, the later are like snakes…it’s already too late when you’ve figured them out.’

    Liked by 1 person

  35. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Earl, I think the coroner will have some idea, but by then, it will be too late.


  36. earl says:

    ‘My wife’s girlfriend moved in with us, and balancing work, life, and leisure has never gone better.’

    Story if you care to read it…(I wouldn’t, just pointing out the latent lesbianism)


  37. The girl in the picture is simply following the herd. In high school that was to be as pretty as she could. I suspect in college the herd told her being pretty was the problem, better to be as unfeminine as possible so she’s not “a victim” or “oppressed” or seen as a sexual object alone.

    My guys is in pic one phase her friends looked similar, in pic two phase, her friends also looked similar. In both pics she’s trying to “fit in” to the standards of the social group she’s surrounded by.

    Peer pressure, basically. After seeing the article in a past post linking to the before and after pics like that one, I started seriously wondering if my girls not being exposed to such college nuttiness may be the best route? When I was in college it seemed like this stuff was just ramping up. 20ish years later it has reached peak nuttiness! (One can hope. At some point being feminine will be the only way to rebell against the androgynous/same sex norm.)

    Liked by 1 person

  38. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I hope that all of this has blown over by the time your kids go to college. Still, they keep finding ways to get nuttier.


  39. earl says:

    Start it now seeings how the wimminz like to be the rebellious bunch.

    Being a ugly lesbian feminist is the norm now…you want to rebel against the evil witchocracy be a sweet feminine woman.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    That is a happy thought. I will sleep the better for it.


  41. Cheque d'Out says:

    Not enough popcorn in the world right now

    DO IT

    Liked by 3 people

  42. SFC Ton says:

    Even though they may act in a virtuous manner, they are secretly getting hammered by Harley McBadboy.

    Then become Harley McBadboy. The bar for that ain’t set very high. You don’t even have to have a criminal record for fucks sake.

    Liked by 1 person

  43. SFC Ton says:

    A primary aspect of Christianity is humility, to realize that we have a sin nature and that we must always work to overcome it. This is humbling.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. mgtowhorseman says:

    Agreed with all and especially worry for Bloom etc.

    Yes its a phase, a rebellion and in five years they will revert to semi normal …but…

    This is some serious and permanent damage some of it uncorrectable.

    So setting them up for massive regret asnd closing off a future based on an impulse reinforced by the herd.

    Kinda like frivorce just as you slam into the wall.

    Liked by 2 people

  45. Fnu Mnu Lnu says:

    i do feel sorry for her. she can’t know what damage she is doing to herself.


  46. Fnu Mnu Lnu says:

    i think that churches are just one more place, that women look to find men that are well above their smv. same as with any other social function, but with the added aire of fake virtue.

    i haven’t been to church in a very long time, but even then it was easy to see the 2-3s chasing the 7-8s, and it was amusing to watch.

    i’ve recently been the subject of similar “hunting up” women. now on a good day i am a solid 5-6, and not really a catch based on my appearance and attitude. However i have been approached by 2-3s pretty regularly over the past few weeks. i have to admit, i feel really uncomfortable with just how direct and blunt some of them have been. one even asked me out to dinner, not even knowing my first name. pretty scary.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. Ash Pariseau says:

    Church women typically have very high standards, unless they are the hypocrite kind of church goers, which from my observation, is a lot.

    I remember one young guy I used to work with exclaimed that he was tired of sluts and wanted a good church going woman. He was 23 and already had two baby mama and frequently bragged about side dishes. I was honest and told him that church going women aren’t going to want someone with his history.

    Liked by 2 people

  48. Alan Kardec says:

    I’m not a parent but I have run programs for teens and college age kids as well as teaching some college courses. My experience has been that no matter how much kids may want to rebel or break away from their parents at times, the days of general rebellion against society are pretty much over. Something has changed. I wonder if the left offers enough of a sense and history of rebellion to fill the need while actually being pretty main stream. Maybe that’s what’s happened but I’m not entirely convincing myself. When I was a youngster I spent a lot of time around the hippies who crowded around clubs and communes in the ’60s and ’70s. They definitely had a sense of rebellion but they were also VERY conformist in relating to people of their own ilk. There’s something about separating yourself through rebellion and then using the pressure against you as a way of being specific, and totally obedient, to your tribe. Everybody does it. We do it here.

    A lot of the kids I see today seem very much a direct product of their parents, no aspects of rebellion that really get my attention … except for the youngest of the kids I was dealing with when I quit that scene. Gen Z as opposed to the slightly older Millennials. They were somewhat more conservative. I wonder if they are rebelling against the culture created by their older siblings. This makes sense in a Darwinian manner; your older siblings are in competition with you for resources, mostly parental attention. You do what you can to differentiate yourself, to stake your own turf.

    I wouldn’t put too much weight on the way actresses present themselves. Doing something new and different (within the narrow Hollywood lane) is prized. It’s their job to look different for different roles. An old saying in the business: there’s a reason the word “news” contains the word “new,” to be news is the business of an actor and that means you have to do radically different things to make news. A performer also has to be ready to play different parts at a moments notice. When it comes to hair you have two options: long hair which can be cut and styled to fit the role, short hair that fits under a wig. This applies somewhat to the guys too. Many are constantly in transition from one hair length to the other. Lastly, compared to civilians, most actors are nuts. Because she’s not a pro, stars-on-her-face girl is more disturbing to me … but then I did some pretty jack-ass stuff in college. Mostly street racing. Luckily, none of that ended up being permanently disfiguring!

    Liked by 1 person

  49. Farm Boy says:

    Church women typically have very high standards

    Yes they do. Which are often pointless to try to meet, as they will never be satisfied. If you do marry one, they probably will frivorce you because you really didn’t meet their high standards with respect to tingles, income, prestige, cars, house etc.

    I sure would have liked to like modern church women, but they make it hard.

    Why bother? Better to go MGTOW

    Addendum: At the time that I was kinda looking at church women I was 6-2, muscular with a somewhat large income. No dice.

    Liked by 2 people

  50. Farm Boy says:

    I never could understand that teen rebellion stuff. Civilization seemed like a good gig; why mess it up?


  51. Yoda says:

    Lesbians reproduce not.
    Be attractive to men they need not.

    Liked by 4 people

  52. Fnu Mnu Lnu says:

    @Ash. want, or will end up with?

    i think that even those “church women” get tingles for the bad boys. they may have a twirl with one on the DL, but still search for the beta to latch on permanently.


  53. Yoda says:

    A Marine squad was marching north of Fallujah when they came upon an Iraqi terrorist who was badly injured and unconscious. On the opposite side of the road was an American Marine in a similar but less serious state. The Marine was conscious and alert and as first aid was given to both men, the Squad Leader asked the injured Marine what had happened.

    The Marine reported, “I was heavily armed and moving north along the highway here, and coming south was a heavily armed insurgent. We saw each other and both took cover in the ditches along the road. I yelled to him that Saddam Hussein was a miserable, lowlife scum bag who got what he deserved.”

    He yelled back, “Barack Obama is a lying, good-for-nothing, left wing Commie who isn’t even an American.

    So I said, “Osama Bin Laden dresses and acts like a frigid, mean-spirited lesbian!

    He retaliated by yelling, “Oh yeah? Well, so does Nancy Pelosi!”

    And, there we were, in the middle of the road, shaking hands, when a truck hit us.

    Liked by 6 people

  54. Yoda says:

    For those familiar with Nancy Pelosi not


  55. SFC Ton says:

    Personally I think church chicks are the worse prospects.

    Typically they are completely enmeshed with the dominate popular culture stuff then they get an extra helping of you go gurl man hating bullshit on Sunday


  56. Yoda says:

    On Saturday, police in central Paris shot and killed a man who went on a mass stabbing spree while he reportedly yelled “Allahu Akbar,” according to media reports.

    Liked by 2 people

  57. Yoda says:

    However, the bill would amend the state Consumer Legal Remedies Act, adding the ability to sue for damages for “advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation change efforts with an individual.” Any efforts to change someone’s sexual orientation “in a transaction intended to result or that results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer are unlawful.” That’s more than therapy. It’s any kind of an argument.

    Liked by 1 person

  58. Yoda says:

    Price themselves out of the marriage market many modern women have

    Liked by 2 people

  59. Yoda says:

    The feminist ethos ruins women in many different ways.

    On par with the dark side of the force it would be

    Liked by 2 people

  60. Yoda says:

    The mobile payment service, which processed more than $35 billion in payments last year, is a no-fuss solution for splitting the dinner bill after a night out with friends.

    But Venmo users have found it’s also an extremely effective tool for keeping tabs on friends, partners and exes, researching crushes, and in some cases, uncovering infidelity. Some even say Venmo is a better method for watching people than more explicitly public social media platforms like Facebook FB, +0.79% or Instagram.

    Some users seem to forget that their transactions are public by default, and their payment activity provides an unfiltered paper trail of what’s really happening in their lives.

    “What you’re seeing on Instagram or Facebook is what they want you to see,” said Abby Faber, a 19-year-old freshman at Indiana University. “They’re edited pictures that they put up. But with Venmo, it’s very normal casual interactions. It’s what they were doing and spending money on.”

    Liked by 1 person

  61. SFC Ton says:

    Having to think what I think about the modern church and modern church goers really harshest my mellow.

    I miss the churches and churched folks of my youth

    Liked by 2 people

  62. earl says:

    ‘I never could understand that teen rebellion stuff. Civilization seemed like a good gig; why mess it up?’

    It just doesn’t produce tingles, man. Civilization takes hard work to create and keep going.

    Liked by 3 people

  63. earl says:

    Comparing secular feminists to church feminists is like comparing getting punched in the nuts to kicked in the nuts.


  64. @Yoda

    That Venmo story is freaky. Why would you want people (anybody on the planet apparently) to be able to see your financial transactions? People today are effing weirdos.

    Liked by 2 people

  65. Yoda says:

    “There is this fear, there is this anger, even rage about women seeking power, women exercising power and people fall back on these attacks like you’re a witch or you should go to prison,” Clinton continued. “It’s not a majority, thank goodness, it’s not, but it’s a very vocal minority at least in my country. And sometimes these tropes are very much part of the press coverage.”

    Liked by 1 person

  66. Yoda says:

    Apply to every women it does not,
    Just to ones like Hillary it does

    Liked by 2 people

  67. Fnu Mnu Lnu says:

    that’s not accurate. a lot of lesbian couples reproduce, by finding a male donor. There are a number of websites that are used to look for donors.


  68. Yoda says:

    Hillary so gosh darn unlikable she would be.


  69. Yoda says:

    Told her campaign to stop polling because seeing how unlikable she was she desired not

    Liked by 2 people

  70. Yoda says:

    Create a campaign ad Tump should have,
    “Imagine being married to Hillary”

    Liked by 1 person

  71. Yoda says:

    So many stimulating women on parade in this thread there is


  72. Yoda says:

    Hope that Hillary never goes away I do


  73. Yoda says:

    “Imagine being married to Hillary”

    With same sex marriage now the law of the land, do it everybody can

    Liked by 2 people

  74. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Spawny Get,
    About those Iranian officials, It would be great if they are willing to testify in Federal court.

    Farm Boy,
    Women do seem to unerringly find something to reject men. In your case, they can’t use the time honored point of being less than six foot tall, so they find something else. It does not matter if it has little practical significance.
    I was aware that church women were any more hypergamous that secular women. They are bad enough that way. I do remember reading an OkCupid profile that St. Francis or Jesus Christ could not qualify for. It thought about messaging her, but passed.

    If you were ever mad at Bill Clinton, take some satisfaction in that he is married to Hillary.
    *big laugh*

    Liked by 2 people

  75. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    It occurred to me, while I was taking a walk, that while women are searching for negatives to shoot down suitors, men are looking for positive attributes to reinforce acceptance. This could go a long way to explaining a lot. The women are getting too good at it and they are doing themselves a disservice.

    I believe you when you say that you see yourself as five or six and that women who are two or three are taking a pass at you. It’s not you, it is their vanity.

    Liked by 3 people

  76. earl says:

    ‘Church women typically have very high standards’

    They have high secular standards. Things like virtue, morality, responsibility, if he displays both good husband and father traits….not very high on their list.

    Liked by 1 person

  77. Farm Boy says:

    Help! It’s Annoying When My Hypersensitive LGBTQ Friends Make Fun of My “Vanilla” Sex Life.

    Liked by 1 person

  78. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Fram Boy,
    I think that she needs new friends. I’ll bet that Dear Prudence must get a lot of strange questions. Some things never change. Dear Abby did too.


  79. Farm Boy says:

    And having now ridiculed herself so completely, Quinlan concludes simply that “I proudly identify as conservative and voted Republican my entire life until 2016. But the Republican party is driving women away. Something needs to change.” Which brings us back to her reasons for being conservative. As I think you’ll see, at least five of those reasons are now utterly laughable:

    “I believe in the Constitution.” Except where due process is concerned, then it’s “rape culture.”

    “I believe in limited gov’t.” Unless a woman “feels held back.” Then government had better move!

    “Power has a corrupting influence.” But apparently only on straight men, and also, there’s no way a powerful woman like Martha McSally could be lying to enhance her political prospects. SLAY KWEEN!

    “I believe in personal responsibility.” Except when women don’t run for office, or seek out the careers Quinlan wants.

    She’s “pro-life.” Yet she still talks about “women’s rights,” even though no rights other than abortion accrue exclusively to women.

    I’m sure she’ll get around to making a mockery of her other conservative principles in time, but we needn’t waste any more exertion waiting on her to do it.

    Liked by 2 people

  80. mgtowhorseman says:

    Modern dumbfuck.

    A CFO so obviously smart but not social mnedia savy. Uploads protest video against Chickafila on Youtube. Someone uses commonly available face recognition (google has it) and I.d.s him and doxxes him.

    Loses his job and it follows him job to job.

    Idiot. Like the tattoo chicks, nstagram models, big red, everyone.

    The Net is forever.

    Why I
    A. Never post pictures or identifying info commenting
    B. Have zero social media accounts
    C. Work for myself
    D. Use an old non gps flip phone.

    Liked by 2 people

  81. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    The Republican Party needs to differentiate itself from the Democratic. The most direct way to do this is to eschew feminism. The problem with modern politics is that they are afraid to offend anyone. It might be good to characterize feminists as man hating lesbians and run with it. They are perpetually offended, so who would notice?
    Sorry, Ivanka.


  82. OT: after 18 out of 22 years in France, this:

    So how is this an argument for immigration and assimilation? Oh wait, it’s not :/

    Liked by 2 people

  83. Yoda says:

    Been more funny if substituted me in they would have

    Liked by 1 person

  84. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    At least he won’t be able to use his trial as a platform. Odd, how the French seem to do this? The good news is that the bad guys are so strapped for resources they have to resort to a single with a knife.They are not using bombs or automatic weapons.

    Mrs. Yoda would not think it funny. Not at all into sharing is she.


  85. SFC Ton says:

    There are a lot of ways for the RNC to differentiate itself from the DNC

    Border security and immigration control is the easiest/ polls the best. Feminims has to much cover from the media and won’t be a good target for a few more election cycles. At least

    But I doubt the RNC will take on anything after Trump. #1 The RNC is the original anti-White, big government progressive party so it supports all this bullshit. #2 is its the potilcal party of the beta cuck.

    The DNC IS most def the home of the soy boy and non Whites. The RNC is the home of the church boy beta cuck and resents attempts at being recasted as the party of White men and legit traditionalism/ nationalism

    Liked by 1 person

  86. Yoda says:

    BBC clueless as always

    It has taken 38 years to change two words in the Canadian national anthem – two significant words but why did this cause such outrage?


  87. Yoda says:

    He seems to understand the problem not

    A Northeastern Illinois University philosophy professor argues that Americans would have no need for sex robots if they were to embrace “wealth redistribution.”

    Tyler Zimmer also suggests “radically” shortening the workday without reducing workers’ wages, asserting that the additional leisure time would “give more people a chance at sexual fulfillment.”

    Liked by 1 person

  88. Cheque d'Out says:

    UK to get 7th Astute class submarine. HM Submarine Agincourt…sacré bleu


  89. Well, if a Northeastern Illinois University philosophy professor says it, it MUST be a good idea!


  90. earl says:

    ‘A Northeastern Illinois University philosophy professor argues that Americans would have no need for sex robots if they were to embrace “wealth redistribution.”

    Socialism will solve everything! Problem is nobody has done socialism right yet!

    Liked by 2 people

  91. earl says:

    The commonality is the men in politics are low T losers who only serve the deep state to destroy the nation. They are two sides of the same coin.

    Liked by 1 person

  92. from Horseman’s link

    When Adam Smith got in his car, drove up to a Chick-fil-A drive through window and began confronting an employee about LGBT rights, he thought he was doing something positive.

    So, your big plan to help foment the revolution is to harass a person working the drive-thru at a chicken sandwich restaurant? Asshole.

    Smith regretted how he expressed his views to the Chick-fil-A employee and proposed making a public apology.

    Let me edit for clarification, “Smith regretted losing his job and income.”

    The guy actually ended up fleeing the country. Best story I’ve read in a long time. Thanks, Horseman.

    Liked by 2 people

  93. Stephanie says:

    Ohhhhhh this is so cute!!! LOL!!!!! Thought it may be worth a share

    Liked by 1 person

  94. earl says:

    And the authorities knew about the guy who gone stabby. Funny that this always seems to be the case.

    It seems they don’t assimilate well because for as flawed as Islam is…there is more of a purpose to it in life than mindless secular consumerism. Real true Christianity needs to make a big comeback in Europe and America to tackle both of these enemies.


  95. Yoda says:

    Badgering a minimum wage employee selling chicken worthy of Jar-Jar it would be


  96. Jar-Jar ain’t never gonna get your order right. Sweeping the parking lot is about all he’d be good for. Actually, make that being a speed bump. Don’t want to over-tax the fella.


  97. A Northeastern Illinois University philosophy professor argues that Americans would have no need for sex robots if they were to embrace “wealth redistribution.”

    Can he get me one the those flying horses to ride while he’s at it? That would cut down my time in traffic and I could put its poop on my rose bushes. I just need to get some rose bushes. Have him throw those in too.

    Liked by 2 people

  98. mgtowhorseman says:

    Ok ROK is usually assholes but I gotta agree with this list except the first one.

    1. “Go for the girl who loves you for who you are” (no such thing, doesn’t exist)

    2. “Prepare to be disappointed by the people closest to you”
    3. “Friends will stick around only if you are useful
    4. No one gives a shit about your problems”
    5. Everyone is playing a game of self-interest”
    6. “Don’t be afraid of rejection”
    7. “Be careful about revealing your true power level”

    Liked by 2 people

  99. earl says:

    ‘1. “Go for the girl who loves you for who you are” (no such thing, doesn’t exist)’

    If you can find a girl who is mildly interesting in things that interest you that’s considered a win. Most of the time it’s all about them and that’s it.

    Liked by 1 person

  100. 7. “Be careful about revealing your true power level”

    Yep. If you show people your maximum effort output, they’ll expect it 100% of the time, while doing their best to minimize their inputs on every transaction.

    Also, yes, ROK is usually just assholes, I gave up on them a while back.

    Liked by 2 people

  101. earl says:

    If there’s one thing we need is another list of what you would tell your younger self. We all know they don’t do that enough in chick blogs. How about 10 things you should all look for in a partner?

    I really don’t see the point of them…or the title doesn’t make sense. I’d just call it…advice I’d give younger people. Take it or leave it.


  102. thedeti says:

    What I posted at Dalrock.

    What’s funny and sad about the Williamson piece is that the advice given to incels is the same advice thrown around all over the place.

    –join a church.

    –marry a single mother.

    –women are sexually attracted to men who go to church.

    Williamson related a story that ended: “I’d love to do something tomorrow,” he says, “but I have an event at my church. The word that stood out in that sentence, with an electric charge, was: church. the idea of dating an old-fashioned churchgoing man was to her very appealing.”

    Suuure. Riiight. That happened.

    Williamson: “there are girls who want to date — and marry — a guy they met in church. You know where you find those girls? Church.”

    Suuure. Maybe in about, oh, 1972.

    “But it’s a safe bet that some of them are there, at least in part, for the same reason you are: They are alone, and they do not want to be. And they don’t want to say “We hooked up after knocking down six Mango Madness Margaritas apiece at happy hour at Bennigan’s” when their parents and friends ask where they met. “We met at church” is a better opening chapter.”

    Mr. Williamson, let me explain a few things to you.

    The vast majority of them ARE hooking up with men after getting drunk at bars. Because they WANT to hook up with those men. Because those men are sexually attractive. They have no intention of marrying those men.

    And many of those women who are in church are alone, after spending a good number of years hooking up with men after getting drunk at restaurants and bars. And many of those women are alone because they don’t want to date the men in their churches. They don’t want to date the men in their churches because those men are not sexually attractive.

    Those women (most of them current or ex-sluts) are being told that they are Daughters of the King. They are special. They deserve only the very, very best. They are being promised men with the bodies of Brad Pitt, the faces of George Clooney, the money of Warren Buffett, the status of Prince William, the charisma of Bill Clinton, the kindness of Jesus Christ, and the spirituality of Billy Graham. They are being told that any day now, an Adonis millionaire who can preach a sermon off the cuff and who is nice to her and only her, will show up, sweep her off her feet, and take her to his mansion in the sky. There is no way in hell women will even look twice at any of the hopeless incels you demand go to church and step into that maw.

    The men in their churches are not sexually attractive because no one has ever told them what is and is not sexually attractive in men. Those men are not sexually attractive because people like you commit educational and spiritual malpractice by telling them and teaching them that loving God and going to church 5 times a week is sexually attractive. IT IS NOT. How about telling them to get exercise, lose weight, lift weights, get therapy, get good at something, make money, carve out a corner of the world for themselves, get some self-discipline, and forget about most women? How about telling them what really is sexually attractive in men? Instead, charlatans and bigots like you, Williamson, tell them that all they have to do to get girls is to sit in a church pew and listen to sermons. This is sheer insanity.

    Williamson, stop talking to these men. Just stop. They’re better off listening to the nonreligious Jordan Peterson than they are to you and your cohorts like David French.

    Mr. WIlliamson, these men don’t need to go to church. These men don’t need to be around clueless feminist pastors who are terrified of their female congregants and who have no idea what is going on in the real world. These men don’t need to be around clucking middle aged harridans and their hen pecked husbands. These men don’t need to be around spoiled sluts with overinflated egos who will nuke reject these men as much as look at them. They don’t need to waste time on lectures or fire and brimstone or singles groups or coed coffees.

    What these men need is someone to HELP THEM. What these men need is someone who will tell them what they’re doing wrong and how to fix it. They need someone to tell them what is and is not sexually attractive. They need real encouragement. They need to know their wants, needs, hopes, dreams and desires are important. They need to know what work they need to do and how to do it and they need men who have done that work themselves to help them. And churches aren’t helping them. AT ALL. And they never will.

    Liked by 3 people

  103. thedeti says:

    1. “Go for the girl who loves you for who you are” (no such thing, doesn’t exist)


    Instead, it should be:

    “Go for the girl who is sexually attracted to you and demonstrates it clearly and often.”

    Liked by 2 people

  104. I know we have had this discussion before Deti but from what I have seen and heard among women, even the hottest chemistry can fade. Maybe I would change it to:

    1. Go for the girl who understands marriage is about building a life, a partnership, raising a family, leaving a legacy — not something that is based on feelz and being “in love” and “always happy” and “fulfilled” and all the rest. Not that marriage can’t have those things, but they are not the rock to build it on. Go for the girl who understands marriage is a long game, and not every day of it will be fun, fulfilling, and exciting. Lots of it will just be regular, uneventful, maybe even boring. Go for the girl who gets that regular, uneventful, and maybe even boring is GOOD because that means things are going ok, there is no crisis, and that’s something to be thankful for!

    Liked by 1 person

  105. thedeti says:


    Yes, all that is fine. But sexual attraction has to be there first, or it’s not going to work. It has to be there from the very beginning. If it’s not there from the beginning, it ain’t ever gonna be there. It’s either there, or it’s not, and it should be there right away.

    I am saying this because way too many men are taught and told that sexual attraction just isn’t important. Well, it is extremely important. It absolutely has GOT to be there IMMEDIATELY, or it is not going to work.

    Also, this is what women should be telling other women to look for in men – building a life and raising a family (marriage is NOT a “partnership”, it is a benevolent dictatorship with man as benevolent dictator and wife as chief operating officer).


  106. Yoda says:

    Police officers have threatened to arrest people and ban them from their Facebook page after they made fun of their tiny cannabis bust online. West Yorkshire Police shared a post about a ‘small quantity of cannabis’ which was seized from a ‘young man who was parked up alone’.


  107. SFC Ton says:

    Never really understood go for a girl who shares your intrests….. then you’d be dating a dude or in need of seriously re-evaluating some life choices. Lets face it tom-boys are in short supply once girls hit puberty.

    What I have noticed is, if a man’s frame is strong and he’s fun to be around his hobbies become their hobbies.


Comments are closed.

Recent Comments
Cheque d'Out on Loose Lips
Cheque d'Out on Loose Lips
Cheque d'Out on Loose Lips
Cheque d'Out on Loose Lips
Cheque d'Out on Loose Lips
Farm Boy on Loose Lips
SFC Ton on Loose Lips
Cheque d'Out on Loose Lips
Cheque d'Out on Loose Lips
Sumo on Loose Lips
Farm Boy on Loose Lips
Farm Boy on Loose Lips
Farm Boy on Loose Lips
Farm Boy on Loose Lips
Farm Boy on Loose Lips
%d bloggers like this: