Commenter MGTOW_Horseman posted this link in a previous comments section.
Political power in Norway is dominated by women. They hold the office of the prime minister, the finance minister, the foreign minister and the speaker of parliament.
“It’s not a female conspiracy,” says Prime Minister Erna Solberg.
Perhaps not an explicit conspiracy. There is however the Feminine Imperative.
Even by Scandinavian chart-topping standards for gender equality, Norway stands out when it comes to the political landscape (they’re not quite as good in corporate Norway). So what gender issues do these politicians worry about?
Why yes, what gender issues do they worry about? It is about what effect the present policies are having on the men. “Justine Trudeau types” who can suck up and check all of the right boxes probably do fine (or so they think). Other men are/will not.
“The challenge in the Scandinavian countries is not to end up with a large group of young men who have no purpose in life, no hope for a job,” Solberg said in an interview in Oslo.
Let us consider this “purpose” issue. It used to be that men became fathers, breadwinners and the engine that moved the country forward. Apparently this situation no longer exists. This seems like a rather large change.
It’s a demographic that needs careful political attention to avoid a dangerous backlash, the prime minister said. At the University of Oslo, about 57 percent of all PhD students last year were women. The risk of men falling behind also makes them more vulnerable to losing their jobs to automation.
Why should men work to become PhDs when the women have the inside track afterward? Furthermore, surely lots of those PhDs are in “studies” type fields, so how valid are they (though surely these women will be sucked up into jobs somewhere)? As for men, when being the father and head of household is no longer on the table, why put in any extra work?
“That’s what we see in the angry white men who not only don’t like Muslims and immigrants, but absolutely not women either, at least if they can’t keep the woman to themselves,” Solberg said.
Perhaps this implies many different things, all of them bad. It could be suggesting that women are carousel riding sluts who won’t commit (at least until after the men have suffered enough). Or that women are having children out of wedlock intentionally (with government financial support of course, that is what they do in Scandinavia). Or perhaps they are just too amazing for most of the local men. For whatever reason, the women are giving men the cold shoulder.
Tone Troen, Norway’s newly minted speaker of parliament, says she’s confident the next generation will do better. But “it’s important that boys and girls make non-traditional choices when it comes to education,” she said.
Perhaps I am reading too much into this, but what this really seems be implying is that through more thorough indoctrination, everybody will accept all of the fine new alternative lifestyles.
Everybody is the same, except when they decide that they are different (as in originate from a designated victim group). Everybody can make their own decision and be part of mutually consenting decisions as long as it isn’t obviously significantly harmful to an individual at that instant in time. This rule set is the future.
What does this future not consider?
I. Not all groups are the same, or can be made to be the same (like men and women for example)
II. Long term effects on the individuals involved are not considered
III. Effects (long or short term) on children involved are not considered.
IV. Who is going to pay financially for the fallout of the bad effects is not considered.
V. The possibly corrosive effects on society are not considered. (or maybe it is by some, and thoroughly delighted they are).
Norway is rich from oil revenues. They can apparently afford this for now. These policy makers probably feel really good about themselves. They no doubt endlessly congratulate themselves about how progressive and enlightened they are. Possibly many of them realize that it is all a pack of lies, that this taken path to the end could not ever work. Or maybe they don’t. Just best to bask in the glory of your own awesomeness.
Final thought: do large groups of sex starved emasculated men ever lead to stability?