First let us consider the false superiority of hypergamy.
Women rate 80% of men as average or below. Therefore an average woman considers an average man (her equal) to be within the top 20% of men. To put it another way, on an attractiveness scale of 1 to 10, a woman of 5 thinks she’s an 8. Her self-rating is 1.6 times greater than her objective rating. She over-rates herself by a whopping 160%. I don’t think this false superiority is confined to physical appearance, either. I think it extends to how women rate themselves vis-à-vis men in every respect.
Three years ago molly asked what hypergamy does to women rated 10. Well, IMHO low-rated women are more prone to over-rating than high-rated women are. Big Red, a woman of 1, has a self-rating so vainglorious that all men are expected to grovel to her wisdom. Triggerly Puff, a woman <0 (I'm tempted to rate her sub-zero), commanded attention with tantrums. Her inflated self-value prompted her to subject everyone, women included, to deafeningly disrespectful behavior.
Who is an example of a man of 10 in good looks? I'm not a good judge. George Clooney is often put forward, but Choicy's countryman of yesteryear, Errol Flynn, had an appearance suggesting strength and not just the pretty face.
I think very few women of 8+ would rate themselves higher than their male counterparts, but I only have my own personal observation to go by. I grew up with female 10s in my life, and it's obvious from their demeanor that none of them would rate herself above her objective score.
A fundamental characteristic of feminists is that they rate themselves above any man. It also seems that the percentage of genuine 8+ women among prominent feminists is lower than that of the general population. This could explain why female Trump supporters are better looking than anti-Trump women. As Trump supporters they are less likely to go with the unattractive feminist type. As good looking women they are less likely to go with the more hypergamous mob. FWIW all of the female 10s in my own life are anti-feminist and conservative.
AS for the rest – the great majority of women – hypergamy is the reason for:
- The smug superiority of their comparisons between male and female.
- The success of the prolific advertisements that belittle the male of the species.
- Their determination to substitute a matriarchy for the civilization that white men built.
- Their determination to suppress men into subservience.
- Their easy acceptance of the systemic under-educating of boys.
- Their proclivity for sanctimonious preach.
- Their scornful dismissal of everything that men have contributed to humanity.
- Their reserving of their greatest racial hatred for white males.
- Their intolerance of equality. They must have more rights than men, more income, more protection, better health care, better education, more affirmative action, more and better of everything.
Now let us consider the argument that unfettered hypergamy will produce a police state. The enshrining of feminism in the law is already giving rise to calls for more thought-control crimes i.e. hate crimes. Feminists want sexual harassment to be a hate crime right now.
The ideological system will rely on citizens informing on each other. Bad attitude in your head will be the crime. We see examples of this with MeToo, and in university disciplinary actions. For certain, unfettered hypergamy with its attendant female superiority will not rest until it controls the minds and bodies of the male underclass.
Further down the track there will be thought police. But wait, we already have that too – or the framework for it at least. A glaring example is the UK Crown Prosecution Service, which not only encourages citizens to inform on the bad attitude of fellow citizens, but also has gone to great lengths to provide for secret informants. The CPS has set itself up as:
- the center of hate crime policing and “thought police”
- the center for an informant network
- the keeper of information on citizens attitudes regardless of their being found innocent
- state prosecutor
…all rolled into one. There’s more from me about the CPS here.
Finally, let us consider the eroding of masculinity. As molly pointed out, masculine men are nature’s counter-balance to hypergamy. Feminism harbors an innate enmity toward masculinity for that very reason. That crucial balance prevents a matriarchal police state becoming a reality.
Unbridled hypergamy would not stop at making gender or sex offences hate crimes and appointing “thought police” to protect women. It would strive for nothing less than the outlawing and eventual abolition of masculinity. Superiority must prevail absolutely (as I’m sure Hitler would agree).
The process is well under way. Feminist ideology is superseding nature. Masculinity is being dismissed, muddled, marginalized, and suppressed.
Current events are evidence that the western world – the feminist world – is losing nature’s balance at an accelerating rate. Is it past the point of no return? Is it too late to stop hypergamy now?