Women teachers just can’t seem to get enough of their underage students. What is going on here. Here is Stephanie:
I’ve thought a ton about why these idiot women are doing this, because I know several in that field that would fit that kind of behavior and track what they’re doing via social media. First is I think most of these teachers I’ve seen do things like that are very messed up in the head. I think it stems from part of the new “normal” of not finding someone when you’re young, then getting a feminized career in teaching, and then they disgustingly get attracted to the younger alpha males in their classrooms and are desperate for that validation since their “time” is waning as a beautiful woman.
Basically, these women don’t seem like they were smart enough to even have *gone* to college, but since they went, they picked a super easy major/degree and coasted through thinking marriage would find them much later and weren’t worried about it at the time. They went to college to have fun, party, sleep around, and be in sororities where those things would be easier to pull off.
They then realize a few years later, how much they actually hate teaching (the ones I know who are my age admitted this maybe 4 years ago around age 26-27), they feel stuck and they hate their jobs, are surrounded by other women in their same position, some of the older ones married but to men they’d never “consider” because that would have been settling (some of my old friends said I was settling… grrrr). And most of the male teachers are older and married, if they have any at all in their school.
The older female teachers who haven’t found husbands scare the crap out of these 29-30’s ones because that represents their future (loneliness, dejected, and still in a job they hate, grading papers every night alone with their cats, drinking wine all the time as “fun,” but now with no family or kids)… and then their looks start to fade and it probably makes them REALLY freak out because now they’re losing time (looks), still have zero eligible men in their field practically and don’t have much time to devote to going where eligible men are, and realize they will probably not have children if they don’t find someone soon. All this realization seeps in eventually and makes them crave knowing they “still got it,” because they know deep down how much they *don’t* have that control anymore like they did in they’re college years. The very best teachers their age either got married before or had a longterm boyfriend when they started teaching and are now married to him.
There’s a consensus even among women that once you’re in a teaching career, your ability to meet and find a good husband drops severely. All these things added up together makes them sitting ducks for trying to see if they’re still attractive and using male students as that measuring stick. If they can get young alphas to think they’re that “hot female teacher” they’d want to have sex with, they they get a major dose of validation that goes against all the signs they’re seeing and feeling of their failure as a woman (the coming loss of ability to attract men who can commit, the loss of their outward beauty, the loss of their fertility).
Basically… they’re losing their essence of being a woman, wasting away in a feminized “career” choice. It makes sense in light of all this.
I saw it play out one time in my own classroom – in college though. I’m not sure about the really young boys (11-13 or 14 year olds) but the older ones are the type that are very masculine, which scares the crap out of me because our sons will be like more than likely. We’ll have to do a good job of teaching them how pathetic these women are – so that they learn to view these hot teachers as pathetic betrayers.
But as for why I called them young alphas? They are the kind who give the teachers a hard time obeying etc. because in what other world or time period were hot young women supposed to be in ***power*** and ***authority*** over these hyper-sexual young males that are already masturbating at least once a day?? Possibly and probably even to their ‘hot” teacher?? You can bet some of the under-aged males they’re having sex with give these women “tingles” because they bulk their teacher “authority” – which you could argue, probably shouldn’t be given to a hot young female that these guys are going to be extremely attracted to. I call them “young alpha males” because they are the ones mostly getting into trouble or standing out for their good looks, etc.
I saw this play out right in front of me with some college freshmen guys that graduated only a few months before – so you can only imagine that it could easily transfer to a high school dynamic. The female teacher was clearly attracted to them and let them get away with bullying others in the classroom – only giving them a slap on the wrist. Why?
My hypothesis? The guys’ ability to breakdown her teacher “authority” by disobeying and refusing to be under her frame of control, is actually gaming her and increasing her level of attraction to them. It’s sick… this lady was married too.
Steph Nails brilliantly the cause and lifecycle to come of many women. Replace teacher with nurse and it is my experience. 14 men (all married) in 200+ women in my long term care facility.
The causes as oulined by Steph
Easy major = little intellectual satisfaction in the work later
Rote work =boredom grinding same tasks for 40 years
Female industry (historical or like medicine taken over) = remote chance of meeting eligible men where you spend 10 hours a day
Older female cohort = literally seeing what is to come, no hiding in delusion.
Odd shift\time intensive work = no time for social life
Female coworkers = drama, catfights, drag back to the crab baskeg those who see the need to change.
Take any industry as women take it over by numbers or policies. The men either drop in numbers or by “men are harassers” policy they ghost to same effect. Self sustaining feedback loop. And as always they did it to themselves.
P.s. re the what about men in male industries.
Well the male industries are hard, dangerous, or intellectual.
The mission actually fulfills the men and replaces minor thoughts, drives lime women.
Hardship actually bonds men together in the brotherhood.
I like very much Stephanie’s discussion of the lifecycle of the bored secondary ed teacher, but my experience is that people who commit selfish criminal acts are rarely so self-aware; they’re not putting “1+1 = jail” together. They’re just looking for an ego boost and some racy nooky. This is also my impression of married women who step out with strange men. And of course today, this is all wrapped in a veneer of self-actualization.
I had never considered that many of these teachers actually hate their work. That’s because they’re always crowing about how meaningful and important their work is. But it makes sense, given how they treat boys and some girls (girls, if they are smarter than the teacher).
I dated a 20-something teacher last year. She was still in the honeymoon phase of her career. She *is* absolutely paranoid about her public image in this small city. That hasn’t changed since the 19th century.
So what is the enabler of all of this silliness? BV touches on this, “rarely so self-aware; they’re not putting “1+1 = jail” together”. Yes indeed, there is probably lots of that. Why should they; they don’t normally go to jail. They often won’t teach again, but they can get married, work at other jobs, etc.
A man teacher on the other hand; well, he knows that if he is caught that it is jail time and any professional job in the future is out of the question. Guys are brought up understanding consequences. Typically these are not spontaneous things, they had been building, and took planning. The man teacher often weights the risks, costs and benefits (though not always well). In the end, the expected punishment is a deterrent.
In the end, is it really asking too much for women teachers to keep their hands off of the boys? Is it asking to much for them to find men their own age?
All men are expected to work their way through comparable problems and much more beyond.
My sixth grade teacher was likely of this type. She was an aging blond divorcee who wore tank tops and tight jeans to school every day. Now that I think back on it, it was inappropriate but at the time I was oblivious. I do remember how “old” she looked, her arms thin but w baggy jiggly skin and her not very big but deflated braless chest. She would lean over the desks of the most attractive male students… shudder! Ewww. Poor guys! I don’t think anything ever happened, that I knew of anyway, but she did clearly get off on thinking she was some irresistible hot thing. Not! Her daughter was the same age as me and I do remember thinking it would be embarrassing to have a mom like that!
I actually like BV’s explanation the best. I think it’s quite simple. You can also split the categories into the married teachers and the unmarried teachers.
And their reasons for having sex with boys are pretty much the same as their reasons for having sex with men.
With unmarried teachers, it’s because the boys are athletic, in excellent shape, and are full, I mean FULL, of testosterone. Their dicks get titanium rod hard in about 10 seconds. Those boys are ready, willing and able for sex at less than a moment’s notice. Some are not all that bright or experienced (from where we get our fun expression “young, dumb and full of cum”). For a woman who’s coming up on the late 20s and still not married, or who’s divorced, it’s a hell of a rush to have a hot young stud with shredded abs jackhammering away on her. The guys they have sex with are young and hot, and they love the sex, but they love the validation more. It’s about hot sex, and validation/affirmation: “I still got it. I can still get a hot guy to have sex with me. I am still an attractive woman. I still have value and worth as a woman.”
With married teachers, it’s some of the above, plus deep unhappiness and dissatisfaction in their marriages and their jobs. Most of these women are married to men they either never really were sexually attracted to, or aren’t anymore. They certainly aren’t as sexually attracted to their husbands as they were to the men they used to have sex with before they got married. There is almost always a history of marital problems – they dont’ get along, financial problems, his affair, her affair, they “grew apart” (all of which are euphemisms women offer for “I’m not sexually attracted to him.”) And a good number of these women have children. They are disappointed with their lives and marriages. They are in deep pain, which produces anger, hate, resentment, and disillusionment.
So why are they doing it? It’s sex with an attractive man. It’s the validation/affirmation that sex produces. it’s also escapism. These women are in so much pain that they are looking for something to soothe it, and the only place they can find it is at their places of employment, which have a ready supply of good looking, athletic, studly young men with big pecs, big guns, ripped abs, and big cocks, who can still get it up and fast.
I think it’s quite simple: These women have sex with these boys because
–it gives them immense power
–they need validation
–the boys are off the charts hot
–the sex is off the charts hot
–they’re in excruciating pain from their relationship/marriage failures
Here’s how I know it’s about raw sexual attraction:
The boys they target for sex either
1) have a reputation for being well endowed; or
2) are student athletes, or
3) are the popular, good looking boys: The studs. The guys who are having sex with all the girls.
You never hear about a teacher having sex with a gawky kid on the chess team, or the scholastic bowl captain, or the slightly effeminate school musical star.
Teachers know what’s up. They know what’s going on with the kids they teach. They know who’s dating whom, who’s fucking whom; who’s bullying whom, whose parents are splitting up; whose dad lost his job, which kids have the budding alcohol/drug problems, which kids are sneaking ciggies on the back porch before afternoon study hall, who the new kids are, and what the general overall social hierarchy is among the kids.
Have you ever noticed that every time there’s a news story about some female teacher who had sex with one (or more) male students, there’s always – ALWAYS – a photo of the teacher?
Because everyone wants to know if the teacher is, well, “fuckable”. Everyone wants to leer at the person who did this. Everyone wants to know if the hot young stud really got to score.
And, from the reports, most of the women who sleep with their students are more or less attractive women, who could sleep with men “their own age”. So there is some fuckedupness there. More than a little fuckedupness.
Here are some of the more famous ones:
Mary Kay Letourneau (now Mary Kay Fualaau): https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=mary+kay+fualaau&FORM=HDRSC2 : Product of overbearing adulterous father and cowering mother, unhappily married young, marital problems, first husband allegedly cheated on her. Interestingly, after doing about 6 years in jail she married Vili Fualaau, the 7th grader she cheated with, who is the father of her two youngest daughters. Fualaau is divorcing her.
Debra LaFave: https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Debra+lafave&FORM=HDRSC2: Straight up, firstball fastball slut. What else is there to say?
Here’s a list with photos of 41 women “caught” sleeping with students. Some are as old as 40. All of them are attractive enough to attract same-aged men. Every single one of them.
Amy Beck: 33 years old, married mother of three. Married to an LA cop. Slept with a student and confessed. Two years in jail.
Probably an unhappily married woman looking for some validation and an escape from her boring life. It’s easy to tell from her photos she’s attractive, had no shortage of male attention throughout her life, and was looking to get some affirmation that she’s “still got it”. Probably got some forward attention from the guy she slept with, and absolutely loved it.
When you’ve been red pilled enough, these cases can be diagnosed in less than the time it takes to brew a pot of coffee on an old 12-cup maker.
“At least we know now not to put any stock into what is said and rely on observation. It will take a lot of observation.”
Not only can female nature hide, obfuscate and dissemble: We also have the problem that the observers will, many times, ignore obvious evidence in favor of what the observed wants the observer to see. The observed is actively trying to conceal the truth from the observer so as to further her objectives. The observers really, really like the pretty lies they hear and so they ignore what’s clearly in front of them.
The observed also lie to the observers, and tell the observers that what is in front of them isn’t really there; and that they’re not really seeing and hearing what they clearly ARE seeing and hearing.