Of course women have the reputation of being nicer than men. Furthermore, they have turned this into women are more moral than men. I am not sure what will come next, but it probably will not be either rational or to my liking.
When I was a wee lad, I saw how girls were trained to be sugar and spice and everything nice. It didn’t always take. Yet, the training was there. I could see that the generations of women before also had this training. I assumed that it was all about preparing to be a good mother, as those attributes seemed to be especially useful with respect to handling young children.
But now, as I have explored the deep dark secrets of the genders, I wonder if there was something more. It seems that women (especially younger ones) have this intense rivalry thing always going on; driven primarily by hypergamy. They used underhanded indirect tricks to advance their position. Much of this can be summed up by the concept of frenemy, where women are simultaneously friends and enemies with other women. Guys can hardly grasp such a concept, for they are often very team oriented, and such silliness would not play well in such and environment. Letting women engage in such silly games when they are young sets a habit for life. Over the course of lifetime, these behaviors are counter productive for everyone that such a woman touches.
That leads to a conjecture: What if the Evil Patriarchy encouraged girls to be nice not so much for the sake raising young children, but for the sake of training women not to be underhanded, backbiting, conniving, drama inducing people that nobody really wants to be around. Considering this further, training women in such a way to avoid all of this behavior would be enormous benefit to all of society, not just the children.
But then, the chilllldrrrrennnn are so important (or so they say), so that should be justification enough.
To learn more, go here,