Mishmash March — Part II


So women had a big march.  They did not specify what they really wanted.  Here is an amusing attempt to elicit their goals (warning — pixelated boobs alert),

So we all are left reading between the lines as to what they really want.  Commenter Saracen II over at RPG’s attempted to do just that,

The Women’s March was absolutely about women’s rights.

The right to conceive a child without informing the father.
The right to carry it to term without informing the father or obtaining consent.
The right to terminate a pregnancy without informing the father or obtaining consent.
The right to designate any male as the father and compel financial support.
The right to remove children from their father’s lives.

These rights are now up for serious and believable re-consideration.
Reproductive responsibility is in the wind and these people dread it.

The March was Grand Theatre to lull and polarise us before the topic is ever raised.

Considering these desires, it is obvious that they could not come out and say exactly what it was that they want.  A Manosphere truism is that women very often try to get what they want via subterfuge.  Perhaps that is what is going on here.  Or Saracen is giving them too much credit; perhaps they don’t know what the heck that they want.  Or it is just a big shit test as suggested in Part I of this series.  What do you think?

 

 

Advertisements
Posted in FarmBoy, Feminism, Politics, Trainwreck
56 comments on “Mishmash March — Part II
  1. Yoda says:

    Wonder what Crowders’s boobs made of they are I do

    Like

  2. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Yoda,
    I don’t want to know.

    Farm Boy,
    As to your question, how about “all of the above”?
    It could be that women may feel that their reproductive dominance is going to be taken out of their hands. The only way I see this happening is if male contraception comes to market.

    Like

  3. Farm Boy says:

    It does seem odd to put all of the reproductive decision power in the hands of women. Does doing so make sense to anybody?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Farm Boy says:

    The March was Grand Theatre

    It was theatre. It was not particularly grand. It really was not impressive at all.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    I don’t think it was planned that women have full reproductive discretion after conception, However, they do like it that way, especially the part about tapping a man for child support that is unaccountable.

    Like

  6. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I have heard that all of feminism is a big test. Why not the Women’s March? And, what is the best way to get past these tests? Proceed as if you didn’t care. Why do I get the feeling that women are going to complain about men ignoring them going forward?

    Like

  7. Huh? What?

    Did the womenz say somethin?

    I wasnt paying attention.

    Like

  8. Cill says:

    “Or Saracen is giving them too much credit; perhaps they don’t know what the heck that they want. Or it is just a big shit test as suggested in Part I of this series. What do you think?”

    They don’t know what the heck that they want.

    The anti-male hysteria they keep on pushing is evidence of that. More and more men will start to wonder what the fuck did we see in them in the first place? When one sex (presently female) confronts the other with venom-spitting hatred, the division between physical attraction and indifference reaches vanishing point.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Spawny Get says:

    Attack on the Louvre in Paris this morning. iirc their visitor numbers were already down by half before this.

    edit: Louvre down 2 million from 9 million last year. Perhaps my remembered 50% was Paris as a whole

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Spawny Get says:

    WooHoo if it’s true

    Liked by 1 person

  11. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I think that Donald Trump should appoint a special prosecutor. He’ll need one for Hillary anyway. Even if it is not true, there still has to be fire to go with the smoke we are seeing.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Cautiously Pessimistic says:

    Regarding Soros, I’d just as soon shoot him as an enemy combatant. Apparently, though, he’s got a U.S. citizenship. In deference to that fact, I’d settle for shooting him as a traitor.

    Like

  13. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    It is not that I have so much a personal grudge against George Soros, but, like Hillary, it needs to be demonstrated to the public that wealth and power do not grant exemption from the law. The confidence of the people in the law needs to be restored and maintained.

    Like

  14. Spawny Get says:

    I’d like to see the Soros types getting the full impact of the same laws the rest of us have to live by.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Spawny Get says:

    Helena Cronin done good here. Didn’t cover all the points, but set a framework for a discussion that could fairly discuss other issues.

    Like

  16. SFC Ton says:

    Special prosecutors don’t get shit done since they are members of the deep state and the deep state protects it’s own

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Spawny Get says:

    It’s my impression that going after the Clintons will end up gutting the entire global political elite

    Like

  18. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Ton’s statement demonstrates the need for prosecution of the powerful. A republic cannot survive in the midst of cynicism and I don’t want to live in an oligarchy.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    This is beyond ridiculous.

    Like

  20. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    It gets worse.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Spawny Get says:

    Bit late for Cill’n’Moll

    Liked by 1 person

  22. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Spawny Get @3:53pm,
    Going after the Clintons would expose the political class and all who enabled them. That would be a good thing. Hillary is their creature and she steppe over the line, many times.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Spawny Get says:

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Spawny Get says:

    Liked by 1 person

  25. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Roosh did a video too and he suggested that the President give these people more than enough rope to hang themselves with. He suggested that he hold off until they kill somebody, which would not involve waiting long the way they are escalating. That way, the wrath of the people will be overwhelming.

    Like

  26. mgtowhorseman says:

    men dont cuddle. period. end of line.

    Like

  27. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Horseman,
    It will profit you to watch that video and the one after it. These campus kangaroo courts have gone full retard. In the second, a judge refused the accused to mount a defense because it would make her feel bad. That one is a gem.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Spawny Get says:

    Liked by 1 person

  29. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    The one significant thing that watching Sargon’s takedown of The Young Turks told me is that Ana Kasparian claimed that federal funds make up fifty five percent of UC Berkeley’s budget. I don’t know if that number is true, but it more than I thought. The threat of cutting off their funds is enough to give them conniptions.

    Liked by 1 person

  30. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    If they are going to put heads of state on animals, they could add the Queen, standing, with one foot on a lion and the other on a unicorn.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Yoda says:

    That chick on the cover of the Crowder video bad with lipstick she is?

    Like

  32. Yoda says:

    the Queen, standing, with one foot on a lion and the other on a unicorn.

    Hopefully spread her legs not so much she would

    Liked by 1 person

  33. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    The lion and the unicorn wouldn’t dare to embarrass her.

    Like

  34. Cill says:

    Ride the lion side saddle the Queen should.

    Liked by 2 people

  35. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    In real life, ride side saddle she does.
    From the RCMP her favorite mount is.

    Like

  36. Cill says:

    Wonder if mount the Duke side saddle the Queen she does?
    Prince Charles a phallus with ears he is.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Spawny Get says:

    I’m hearing rumours that his kid is the same and his stepson no better.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Cill says:

    Chip off of the old block:

    Harry (left) and his biological dad?

    Liked by 1 person

  39. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    That would be between the Duke and her, both literally and figuratively. It is not my place, as an American bear, to speculate.

    Like

  40. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    Until you pointed it out, I wanted to believe that Diana held up that part of her marriage. Price Charles made a bad choice. If true, it is not only adultery but high treason to mess with the succession. Catherine the Great was rumored to have Paul by another, but those who saw both Peter III and Paul as adults were certain he was Peter’s son. Still, people are ready to believe the worst about Catherine.

    Like

  41. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Men should not do anything that could put them in front of this judge in Travis County TX.
    https://pjmedia.com/drhelen/2017/02/03/the-pussy-hat-a-symbol-of-hate/
    She actually wore her pussy hat in court. It’s linked in the post.

    Like

  42. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Now we can’t buy Audis.

    Like

  43. Fuzz

    Men dont cuddle.
    They dont sleep in the same bed with a woman
    They dont have meals with women
    They dont talk to women
    They dont sit in the same room with a woman
    They dont acknowledge women

    There. Done.

    But where are all the good men??

    Like

  44. Linny says:

    Well, Horseman, they would all be shooting pool and drinking beer without any women cheerleaders – right?

    Like

  45. Yoda says:

    A new post there is

    Like

  46. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Horseman,
    You should watch both those videos. In the first, the guy got tossed out of the college where all our astronauts come from because he cuddled his sweetie without consent. The second tells of a young man who booted out of Amherst because he had oral sex while passed out. Now the judge won’t let him cross examine his accuser.

    By the way, are we all expected to be like this?

    It’s fine to shoot the shit by the campfire drinking coffee with the guy but, when do we get to have sex with the girls?

    Like

  47. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I am late with this, but Ton wanted to know who Shia LeBoef is.

    Like

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: