Commenter Cautiously Pessimistic stated,
So long as women insist on behaving like defective men, they’ll only ever be valued as a wet hole.
Probably everybody here can agree on the fact that men and women are different inherently. It is much more than “women are men who can have babies”. How the brain forms, how the its differences manifest themselves in different behaviors, all of this makes men and women different.
What successful societies have done in the past is to play to each gender’s good points, while trying to mitigate their bad aspects, forming an effective compromise. Once again, notice that this is what successful societies did. That is mostly gone now. Women are told that they should be men who can have babies (if they feel like it, though hopefully they won’t from the Feminist’s Leaders point of view). So how well does this notion work?
Women are miserable — let me count the ways
I. They want to have babies, they want to be there to raise them. Is this truly possible if they are defective men
II. They want men to at least somewhat dominate them — somewhat rare in an era when the women are exalted and the men are cowed.
III. Eventually many will desire any man, dominant or not, for long term commitment– he won’t be there
Men are miserable (though with an understanding of MGTOW on the rise, they are less so)
I. They are attracted to feminine women. Who knows precisely why this is, but it is. Where are these women?
II. Most women are not feminine, so they really are not useful for more the F-buddy status that Cautiously Pessimistic alluded to. And with women’s inflated self-worth and unleashed hypergamy, large numbers of men won’t even qualify for this.
III. Having children is a minefield, unless you are a sexy layabout or thug, so for lots of men, this is out.
Let’s hear from the commenters about the advantages of women being defective men.