Feminists (and SJW types in general) like to try to quickly and easily dispose of an opponent by name calling with such terms as misogynist, sexist, racist, xenophobic, etc. The gentleman in the above video makes this point. He suggests that this is one reason why people are turning against them; that is, they are apparently too lazy to even have a discussion. He suggests that instead of instantly reaching for the names, that a dialog with other people would work better.
I might suggest that it is a good sentiment, but he is barking up the wrong tree here. There are good reasons that these people do not engage in a dialog, other than being lazy. The primary one is that once facts and logic are introduced into a conversation, then the lefty perspective typically falls apart. Name-calling is just a pre-emptive approach to avoiding this happening.
Why do these positions typically fall apart? Well, there are often many reasons, but perhaps the biggest is that these people just do not have a good model of human nature. Or maybe more precisely, they have a model that deliberately ignores the truth of human nature. Deep down, many know this. This is why they work so diligently to avoid any real dialog on much of anything.
To be honest, I am not sure why the above fella suggests dialog as a solution. Perhaps he actually believes that these positions can stand up under scrutiny. Maybe he lives in a closed bubble where there are many discussions, with most of them being “how many angels can fit on the head of a pin” types; deliberately avoiding areas of relevance.
You tell me. How does one discuss anything with a Feminist / SJW type?