Root Cause Analysis


For some odd reason, modern women writers, when discussing the situation with respect to men, just cannot understand what is happening.  They consider the problem superficially, but never get to the root of the problem.  Men with jobs that need to be actually accomplished have little time for foolishness, thus normally trying to get to the true cause of the problem.

Probably these women deep down know what the issues are, but neither they, or their audiences want to hear them.  Let us look at the latest case,

There are lots of things I love about Britain, just not its men.

That sets things off to a good start.  As we shall soon see, perhaps she might consider that the feeling is mutual.

Finding Mr Dreamy is difficult because the main strategies a girl can use are wrought with danger. Number one is proactivity: in 2016, it seems fair that a woman can approach a chap she fancies. This sometimes works, but generally does seem to make the man’s insides shrivel up when asked “having a good night?” or something equally menacing.

Apparently she has tried to be forward, and scared some fellas away.  I am guessing that there are lots of ball-busters around, and men are using this as a way to try to filter them out.  Furthermore, men in general don’t like really assertive women.  Perhaps she might consider the situation form a guy’s perspective.

So we consign ourselves to option two: waiting. Which is just as problematic, as nothing happens. That’s the conclusion my friend and I came to last week, while we were sitting at a bar. We’re hardly bad company and several lads gave us a cheeky stare as they did the toilet trot. Still, nothing happened, so we stared sadly into our Mojitos at single reflections.

Men won’t approach, women hit hardest.

Now I’m not Claudia Schiffer, but I don’t think I’m Chewbacca either. Yet operating in this asexual environment, it is possible to feel largely unattractive. Some sort of winter chill has frosted over British men’s gonads, and it’s leaving us all out in the cold.

Now she is diagnosing and placing blame.  It is men’s gonads that are the problem.  Really, she doesn’t have anything better?  Is this the product of a fine education?

If only they’d learn from the Europeans, maybe we’d be in with a chance. In countries such as Italy, Spain and France, the men are as forward as it gets. In such territory, a woman’s self esteem may rise substantially from all the glory of being chatted up.

So she longs for some latin passion to assuage her ego.  Would these Romance Language Speakers that chat her up make good LTR prospects?  Or are they mostly about flings?  As we will soon see, an LTR is supposedly what she wants.

In 2014, newspapers boasted that the City of London is fantastic for women – because it has 155 single men per 100 ladies. These numbers seems favourable – until you realise that you’re dealing with the most placid of creatures, many of whom seem to delight in their solo status.

Are they placid, or are they wise to the game?  Furthermore, why do they delight in their solo status?

You may be thinking that all this is trivial, but this dating dallying has big societal consequences. As the Guardian likes to remind us, loneliness kills – so dithering lads are actually murderers, when you think about it.

Murderers the fellas are?  That seems a bit much.  Men exist to keep women from getting lonely?  Perhaps she should consider why men would rather be by themselves or with their buddies than with women.

Birth rates and loneliness aside, it’s a simple issue of self-esteem that worries me. Because of daft, but very real, rules of engagement, most women really are at the whim of men to decide their dating destiny. You wouldn’t believe how many guys are averse to forward women, but then won’t do the forward thing themselves. So everyone is stuck.

Who’s self-esteem is she worried about?

Finally she is getting somewhere.  Some of the problem (as seen by her) is that guys are scared of making a wrong move and paying a big price for it.  Now where does the fault for the implementation of these rules of engagement lie?

As for Romance Language Speakers, they are given a pass on the rules of engagement (within reason).

When I talk to single friends, many of us share a simple desire: we just want to be talked to more. Frankly, it’s getting us down. British lads, please find your gonads.

Here is the author’s big finish, high powered shaming.  I will respond with this: throughout history men have taken risks when the reward appeared to be commensurate to the risk.

Advertisements
Posted in FarmBoy, Feminism, Lies
126 comments on “Root Cause Analysis
  1. FNU MNU LNU says:

    The problem is that the UK has practically become a socialist paradise. Just look at what an “ASBO” can be issued for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-social_behaviour_order And then consider all of the “compensation cases” filed against local councils for injuries. 75 Million pounds in 5 years is insane: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052733/Council-staff-paid-75million-compensation-claims-just-FIVE-years.html

    The nanny state the women wanted has fucked itself out of “men”.

    Karma is a bitch!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Yoda says:

    When I talk to single friends, many of us share a simple desire: we just want to be talked to more.

    LTRs they do want.
    But short term ego stroking do it will

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Yoda says:

    What if a prominent Brit man did say,
    “Love Britain I do, but its women I like not”
    Much fuss there would be

    Liked by 2 people

  4. FNU MNU LNU says:

    I just saw her picture, and now I understand why no guys are chasing her. In training we called that an “academy 10. Two six packs and a minus 2”.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. SFC Ton says:

    Again, who gives a fuck?
    Why is a mgtow blog spending this much time on the concerns of women?

    Like

  6. Yoda says:

    Dig deep into why men letting her down she does not.
    Perhaps come here she should.
    Questions answered they are.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Yoda says:

    Why is a mgtow blog spending this much time on the concerns of women?

    Understand all stuff good it would be.
    To comprehend how clueless the other side is useful it is

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Yoda says:

    Odd that better journalism here there is
    compared to fancy publications there would be.

    But then, perhaps it is odd not

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Yoda says:

    Pathetic it is that those with eyes they have,
    see the obvious they do not

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Ame says:

    Ton – i would guess no need to worry about that … Yoda’s still around so the comments will move quickly from what concerns women to their boobs 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Yoda says:

    Introduce that word on this thread I did not

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Ame says:

    grasping at straws, Yoda is 😉

    Like

  13. Cill says:

    The women is probably a self-styled feminist.

    Earthworms are more successful in life than feminists are. Earthworms don’t fill their ganglia with lies and aspirations beyond their very limited abilities. They don’t make enemies of the most successful of their species. Feminists have no place in nature. Male feminists in particular are the weakest creatures that ever lived.

    Liked by 3 people

  14. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Women have collective control over the sexual marketplace. It is that simple. That it is locked in Britain is their fault. I wish that I could have saved it but, from a UK woman’s Ok Cupid profile, she listed a numer of things she would not do to a date. All were underhanded and mean spirited, none were common in the US, and all were common there. The ladies have dealt themeslves out of the game.

    The author may not be a ten but she is lean, puttting her ahead of two thirds of women and her features are not unpleasant. She would be admonished for eating crackers in bed.

    Like

  15. FNU MNU LNU says:

    Like what things?

    Like

  16. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    I thought that earthworms self replicate and do not sexually mate. Feminists would be extremely inept to be sterile presuming that.

    Like

  17. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    FNU,
    I wish I could remember. They were all dirty tricks that US women don’t pull.

    Like

  18. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    And they all stemmed from casual dating. She didn’t need to suck him into a sexual relationship.

    Like

  19. Cill says:

    The woman is mentally retarded. She has enough brain power to achieve stupidity, and no more than that.

    Like

  20. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill
    She does believe that it is her privilege to have men on demand because she is female. Considering that she is ove thirty, she is beginning to see that it doesn’t quite work that way. From the tone, it sounds like she has walked into a sexual marketplace where the men aren’t buying. Her stupidity is from not understanding why and, of course, blaming men for her inconvenience.

    Like

  21. Cill says:

    This is her, right?

    Like

  22. Farm Boy says:

    Chewbacca

    Like

  23. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    I remember a slwender brunette.
    Could that have been the picture at the head?

    Like

  24. Farm Boy says:

    Claudia

    Like

  25. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    All this confusion because The Telegraph will not support IE9. I must have two posts confused.
    Now, from the point of view of a bear, a female wookie would give her some competition.

    Like

  26. Farm Boy says:

    Actually Claudia does not seem that appealing. At least compared to expectations of being a supermodel.

    Like

  27. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I don’t know about Claudia. She was married to David Copperfield. Could it be that she was the greater magician in making her marriage disappear?
    That does bring up a point. How many of these women are recycled frivorcees? Do they deserve a second chance? I don’t think so. Who around here would want to date Amber Heard?

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Farm Boy says:

    I remember a slwender brunette.

    Chewie is not slender, but he is a brunette

    Like

  29. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    How do you know that Chewbacca is not slender. He has to be packing a lot of fur to add to his visual bulk.

    As for Claudia Schiffer, a spring chicken she is no more.

    Liked by 1 person

  30. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    As for what I said earlier about dating UK women and associated hazards, perhaps our Glorius Patriarch can confirm. However, he may not be able to compare UK and US women’s dating behaviors.
    I have to wonder, why would women play dirty tricks right off the bat? I would think that a little patience would reward them.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Farm Boy says:

    Tarn,

    It is OK to come to this thread. Nobody is talking about those things except Ame.

    Liked by 3 people

  32. Farm Boy says:

    Yes, I am also curious about those dirty tricks.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Farm Boy says:

    She has enough brain power to achieve stupidity, and no more than that.

    Part of it might be that she was never really challenged to be better. She is a woman, awesome as is. A fella on the other hand has to strive, as stuff is usually not handed to him

    Like

  34. Tarnished says:

    As the Guardian likes to remind us, loneliness kills – so dithering lads are actually murderers, when you think about it.

    So of course this woman is very sympathetic to the plight of incels, right?

    Or is the lack of desired human contact only something that is of importance when the female of our species is affected?

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Farm Boy says:

    To paraphrase Hillary, “When men die, women hit hardest”

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Farm Boy says:

    Donald Trump unleashed a new barrage of attacks against Hillary Clinton in a blistering speech on Thursday, accusing his Democratic presidential rival of running a “criminal enterprise” and saying her policies have spread terrorism around the world.

    Speaking from a teleprompter ahead of a speech on education in Cleveland, Trump accused Clinton and her family of a litany of scandals and crimes.

    “She put the country, and I mean the entire country, at risk to cover up her pay-for-play scandals as secretary of State,” Trump said. “These include scandals of giving uranium to Russia, doing favors for UBS bank, and selling contracts to friends and family in Haiti. It’s all about hiding criminal enterprise.”

    http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/295036-trump-accuses-clinton-of-running-a-criminal-enterprise

    Liked by 2 people

  37. Tarnished says:

    Tarn,

    It is OK to come to this thread. Nobody is talking about those things except Ame.

    What things, again…?

    Like

  38. Tarnished says:

    Yes, I am also curious about those dirty tricks.

    Good ones or bad ones they are?

    Like

  39. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn,
    “What things, again?” I can imagine Yoda, frustrated beyond reason, wanting to discuss these things.

    Farm Boy,
    When Trump said “criminal enterprise”, he threw down the guantlet. The only way for Hillary to avoid prosecution is to win. I hope tha he means it.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Yoda says:

    I can imagine Yoda, frustrated beyond reason, wanting to discuss these things.

    Imagine you could
    But true it would be not.
    Jedis disciplined they are

    Like

  41. Tarnished says:

    This sometimes works, but generally does seem to make the man’s insides shrivel up when asked “having a good night?” or something equally menacing.

    Since when?

    Like

  42. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    To refresh my memory about those dirty tricks, I would have to sign on to Ok/ Cupid and find an out of country profile fromyears ago. Will you forgive me for not wanting to sign on to Ok Cupid?
    I dismised the dirty tricks from my conscious knowing that they wouldn’t happen here in the US. As bad as we make them out to be, American women are not malevolent off the bat.

    Like

  43. Tarnished says:

    Furthermore, men in general don’t like really assertive women.

    Assertive to ask men out it is?

    Like

  44. Yoda says:

    Since when?

    Perhaps since British women dirty tricks they did use

    Liked by 2 people

  45. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn,
    In response to your earlier question about incels, I doubt that she gives them a thought. It reminds me of M3’s famous post that was spurred by a woman complaining that she had gone without for two weeks. For M3, it had been ten years. He wasn’t an incel, he was a Toronto resident.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Yoda,
    To OkCupid I will not go.
    The Dark Side it is.

    Liked by 2 people

  47. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    My search engine gives me lots of results for dirty tricks for divorce. Thsi may be unpublicized.

    Liked by 1 person

  48. Yoda says:

    Wonder if she believes that the Italian men who talk her up good LTR prospects they are I do

    Liked by 2 people

  49. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Yoda,
    It may be that Italian men visiting England may give the women a wide berth. There was an incident in Italy that was judged to be a false allegation. Italy asked for extradition and I don’t think Britain ever allowed it to proceed.

    Liked by 1 person

  50. Ame says:

    “In a case of creative but self-destructive problem solving, 70-year-old Kansas City resident Lawrence John Ripple robbed a bank and then waited until police came because he’d rather go to prison than continue to live with his wife.”

    http://www.someecards.com/news/dumb-crime/man-robs-bank-to-get-away-from-wife/

    Liked by 3 people

  51. Yoda says:

    Wonder what root cause here is I do

    According to a KFOR report, Patricia said she didn’t believe that she would be breaking the law by marrying Misty as her name does not appear on her daughter’s birth certificate.

    Patricia had previously married her son, Jody, in 2008, with the marriage annulled two years later.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/08/mother-and-daughter-arrested-over-incestuous-marriage/

    Liked by 1 person

  52. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Ame,
    He may only get eighteen months for pulling a note job. Uh oh!

    Yoda,
    I cannot answer for a root cause. That is beyond belief and description.

    Liked by 1 person

  53. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Two fifteen year ods have sex. Only the boy is punished. Double standard much?
    http://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2016/09/08/new-hampshire-prep-school-sued-over-kicking-out-student-who-had-sex

    Liked by 2 people

  54. Tarnished says:

    It reminds me of M3’s famous post that was spurred by a woman complaining that she had gone without for two weeks.

    Miss M3 I do.
    Considered him an online friend I did.
    Emailed each other a few times we had…good mind he does have.
    Hope he is happy and healthy, Tarn does.

    Liked by 2 people

  55. Tarnished says:

    Two fifteen year olds have sex. Only the boy is punished. Double standard much?

    That doesn’t even make sense. Most states have Romeo and Juliet laws for this reason.

    Everyone knows what I think of double standards, though. Some manospherians apparently do not mind them, but I do. Very much, in fact.

    Liked by 1 person

  56. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn,
    A great blogger he is but, he did the impossible. He found a good girlfriend on Plenty of Fish in Toronto. I hope that all is well. If he hadn’t found her, his extended family would have fixed him up with a farm girl from Poland.

    Like

  57. Cill says:

    Re the clown who has been scaring people somewhere in America. A police report states: “We are looking for a clown or someone dressed as a clown.”

    Liked by 1 person

  58. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    That is a terrible description. No doubt, they will bring hundreds of suspects and none of them the culprit.

    Like

  59. Yoda says:

    This clown

    Liked by 1 person

  60. Cill says:

    I’m about to start on “Boobs or Bust”. I’ll do a draft, but might not publish it.
    It’s going to be a tightrope.

    Liked by 1 person

  61. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Yoda,
    That coat that Hillary is wearing, if hand embroidered, must have cost a fortune. Are we going back to supporting an aristocratic class that wears more than people make in a year?

    Like

  62. Cill says:

    “We are looking for a clown or someone dressed as a clown”
    Is there a difference? Perhaps Big Red could tell us.

    Liked by 1 person

  63. hansolo007 says:

    That old tired excuse of men not liking women who approach is BS. If she’s attractive to him he’ll like it. If not, he won’t. The problem is that women typically approach (when they rarely do) men who are out of their league and the guy will either not be interested at all, or be interested only for casual sex, or might be polite and talk a bit but not be interested in anything more. The women fallaciously equates this with guys not liking it when women approach when it’s really guys not liking it when women-way-beneath-their-league approach.

    Liked by 3 people

  64. FNU MNU LNU says:

    Consensual, but felt pressured.

    And he gets kicked out for that.

    No hope…

    Liked by 1 person

  65. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Han Solo,
    I can see that happening. Is it that they are swinging for the fences, that they are not aware of SMV difference, or they just don’t care?

    Like

  66. Spawny Get says:

    Speaking of approaching and rejection

    Like

  67. Spawny Get says:

    Have the health issues risen to the point where ‘I can walking’ becomes a campaign issue?

    Like

  68. Spawny Get says:

    Why is she wearing the ironing board cover?

    Liked by 1 person

  69. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Spawny Get,
    Earlier in the thread, I remembered reading a woman’s profile on a dating site. She was from the UK and hd a llist of things she would not do to men she dated. They were all ddirty and underhanded. To be honest, I put them out of my mind because women in the US don’t play those tricks. Can you help fill in some of the blanks? Do women in the UK play dirty tricks on men they are just dating? Thsi woman in her profile made it seem so.

    Like

  70. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Without watching the video from Vee, I can say that feminists are all over that guy because he had the audacity to say that he wouldn’t date feminists. They are all over him on Twitter over his apearance being average. He does have a point. Feminism is responsible for dividing men and women, not uniting them. They won’t address that.

    Like

  71. Spawny Get says:

    The image I found of a writer of her name was that of a munter. A married munter mum at that. The only men she could successfully approach would be Benny from Crossroads

    Quasimodo might appreciate being approached by a munter. A man of foreign origins suffering a ‘sexual emergency’ might appreciate a five minute session with an approaching munter. Normal men? No, not really.

    Whereas women get an ego boost and social validation from rejecting an approach (nuclearly or no), men just see it as a pain in the arse if they don’t fancy her.

    Liked by 1 person

  72. Spawny Get says:

    Fuzzie, not an area in which I dabble, sorry. I’m just not that fussed.

    Liked by 1 person

  73. Spawny Get says:

    Same woman (Gail Porter)

    To me that’s an attractive expression on her face, that of an actual adult. Not some yugogrill biatch, nor a mental vegetable with jubblies.

    Have some women just forgotten how to appear normal, approachable and just without ‘attitude’?

    Liked by 2 people

  74. Sumo says:

    Quasimodo might appreciate being approached by a munter. A man of foreign origins suffering a ‘sexual emergency’ might appreciate a five minute session with an approaching munter. Normal men? No, not really.

    I am far from being “normal”, but working in an open kitchen means that I get eye-raped on a daily basis from hotties and fuglies/land whales alike.

    The hotties get a SumoSmirk and a wink. The fuglies/land whales get ignored. With extreme prejudice.

    One guess which “group” tips better. 😉

    Liked by 3 people

  75. FNU MNU LNU says:

    The land whales, because their checks were bigger?

    Liked by 2 people

  76. SFC Ton says:

    We’d also would have to define “approach ”

    In my experience women don’t really approach and open a conversation
    They will hover near by, maybe say one or two words etc but don’t really approach in such a manner that displays their interests so your typical guy can pick up on what she is laying down

    When they approach in a more direct manner it’s with a gimmedat attitude, like “hey its my friends birthday, buy us/me a drink”

    Liked by 2 people

  77. Tarnished says:

    Have some women just forgotten how to appear normal, approachable and just without ‘attitude’?

    Yes. In fact, a lot of women put on a *deliberate* resting bitch face in public, simply to dissuade men from talking to them, making eye contact, asking them out, etc.
    I purposefully smile *because* my resting face is the INTJ Death Stare, and I don’t want small children, the elderly, or puppies to run away in fear.

    Liked by 2 people

  78. Tarnished says:

    When they approach in a more direct manner it’s with a gimmedat attitude, like “hey its my friends birthday, buy us/me a drink”.

    Pfffft.
    Uh…no.

    Liked by 2 people

  79. Tarnished says:

    We’d also would have to define “approach ”

    In my experience women don’t really approach and open a conversation
    They will hover near by, maybe say one or two words etc but don’t really approach in such a manner that displays their interests so your typical guy can pick up on what she is laying down.

    Subtle as fuck = not real approaching imo

    Liked by 2 people

  80. hansolo007 says:

    @Ton Yes, they hover, maybe say a couple words. Some big approach doesn’t happen that often. They try to show enough interest (though often it’s subtle from a guy’s perspective, especially from the beta male’s perspective) to get the guy to run with it.

    @fuzziewuzziebear “Is it that they are swinging for the fences, that they are not aware of SMV difference, or they just don’t care?”

    Women will often be approached by men that are below, at and above their SMV (though not way above). She doesn’t want the men below. Equals will receive mixed treatment, sometimes well received, sometimes not. So, she doesn’t really need to do much to get the attention of an equal. She can make eye contact, smile, hover near him, even say hi and that will often get the man to take it from there. So, it’s more the above-her-SMV men from who she won’t get as much attention, and for whom she feels more attraction. In most cases she won’t do much more than hover or try to catch his eye or smile (if she does anything at all) but in some rare cases she’ll try to strike up a conversation.

    In most cases for me, I’ve had to do the approaching for interactions with women near my SMV, but I tend to be an approacher when I like a woman. I have observed more aloof men can sometimes bring women out of their shell to “approach” them (when of roughly equal SMV) but that’s usually in an environment where they see each other somewhat regularly so that it gives time for the woman to see the man and her intrigue for him to grow and she finally can’t stand it and has to talk with him. I would say for most men, that being aloof isn’t going to get female strangers to come up and talk to them, it will just lead to no interaction, even if the women do feel attraction and interest.

    Back in my church-going days, there was a quite a bit of girls inviting guys over for dinner (in groups) or movies or whatever and often they would invite guys of slightly higher SMV/MMV with hypergamous hopes held high. That was an environment where being a bit aloof and not approaching tons of women could pay benefits for the men because the women would see them often enough and since it was a more or less friendly environment they might say hi in passing in the halls and it would create a growing interest in the women.

    I remember one example of an attractive girl that I was interested in and I approached her and we talked and she wasn’t that into me but we hung out once or twice and talked on the phone a bit. Fast forward 6 months. I had a gf. It turns out that uninterested girl and gf knew each other from before and gf always was being asked out so massive preselection suddenly kicked in and uninterested girl became very interested girl. As things were dying out with gf (and she told me I should go out with other girls as well; her passive hint that she wanted to break up), now-interested girl invited me for dinner alone at her house and made food related to somewhere I had lived in the world and really liked. This is an example of how over time she was able to observe me, I had the suddenly high value (in her eyes) of the gf that uninterested-girl saw as higher value than herself, I wasn’t pursuing uninterested girl anymore because I had a gf, and she had enough time to stew on realizing that she could have had me before and she felt like she was missing out and wanted me.

    Liked by 2 people

  81. Cill says:

    Tarn “Subtle as fuck = not real approaching imo”

    ….

    Man: “Hey do you fuck?”

    Woman: “Not until now you smooth-talking bastard.”

    Like

  82. molly says:

    Lovely morning! I invited my fav men today for Saturday dinner. My beau and Dad and a bro and cuzzies. Men only except me and I will only serve and wait. Very soon I will boat over to Cill and choose some latest fish and potatoes for homemade chips or farm beef for a roast. Big men need *big* healthy feed!

    Liked by 3 people

  83. I have always been fairly hesitant to actively approach a guy. It’s more like Han and Ton describe, somewhat hanging about and waiting to be noticed. Not very effective really but I have not figured out a way for it not to seem “pushy.” But I can see how that could be very unclear to a guy, “is she open to an approach, or not?” I have noticed guys seem to strike up with a rather casual comment, like “do you have the time?” Or whatever and then if the girl is friendly they may continue to see if it goes somewhere, versus right away showing his hand with a direct approach. I am not sure that’s helpful at all, I am e fairly rusty at any of this and my methods are I am sure much outdated…. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  84. Spawny Get says:

    A right nice pair…oo-err missus

    Like

  85. Spawny Get says:

    Flying Hippo. a few seconds ago

    I took the shell off my racing snail, thinking it would make him run faster.

    If anything, it made him more sluggish

    Liked by 1 person

  86. Farm Boy says:

    The latest controversy involving Hillary Clinton’s decision to run her State Department e-mail through private servers contains a hard-to-believe shocker that ought to give reasonable people pause.

    Her supporters will join her campaign in decrying a “conspiracy” to spoil her presidential aspirations. But really, how can an objective observer not find problems with this latest story, which suggests a dark conspiracy indeed: An errant engineer decides on his own volition to delete e-mails from her private account after a congressional committee orders them preserved? …

    Given that FBI director James Comey’s decision to clear Clinton of wrongdoing in the e-mail scandal came with his unusual denunciation of her actions as “extremely careless,” the information from the bureau’s summary of its investigation doesn’t sit well. It’s reasonable to ask why the FBI didn’t look deeper. It’s reasonable to ask why the engineer would act if, as the logic of the cover story must argue, the e-mails were simply personal notes about yoga appointments and being a grandmother.

    http://www.denverpost.com/2016/09/08/a-fish-story-in-platte-river-networks-purge-of-clinton-e-mails/

    Liked by 1 person

  87. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Spawny Get,
    I had hoped that you might have some second hand knowledge of local dating. I am stil bothered b that woman’s profile. Perhaps someone who has been both here and there has written about it somewhere. The odd thing is that men don’t complain until it is well beyond ridiculous.

    Han Solo.
    A great story! Preselection is powerful. I think it was at your old blog that someone suggested to hire an escort and cruise art gallery shows.

    Like

  88. Yoda says:

    Made it through an entire thread without mentioning Tarn’s thing-a-am-jigs I did

    Liked by 1 person

  89. Yoda says:

    “Eyes” I do mean

    Like

  90. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    The teflon coating on fortunate polititians does not last forever. At some time, hopefully soon, it will turn to velcro.

    Like

  91. Yoda says:

    Between Claudia and Chewbacca, Chewbacca seems more real he does

    Like

  92. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Yoda,
    Maybe it is the likelihood of rejection but, a female Wookie in an apron holding a tray of pastries would look pretty good to a bear.

    Like

  93. Yoda says:

    A new post there is

    Like

  94. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Political Correctness is out of control in Quebec.

    Campus security chasing off a display of the national debt??? I think it would be better recieved in Western Canada where they raise a lot more federal tax than they spend.

    Like

  95. SFC Ton says:

    lol you should try looking like me n

    Liked by 1 person

  96. SFC Ton says:

    Wellllllllll I don’t see a problem with the hover and try to get noticed lady approaches

    It’s the deliberate lack of training/ understanding/ preparation of young boys that is the issue, as in they are set up for failure

    Liked by 2 people

  97. Tarnished says:

    I might need some pointers, Ton. 😅

    Like

  98. Yoda says:

    It’s the deliberate lack of training/ understanding/ preparation of young boys that is the issue, as in they are set up for failure

    Yes they are.
    Perhaps Farm Boy write about this topic he could

    Liked by 1 person

  99. SFC Ton says:

    lol that would require some mild disfigurement and a gnarly beard to cover up most of it

    Liked by 1 person

  100. Tarnished says:

    Hmm. The beard may be the breaking point. I’m not overly fond of facial hair. I already have some minor scars on my arms from my wildlife rehab days, though…Will spots from owl talons and lines from fox scratches suffice?

    Liked by 1 person

  101. Ame says:

    Ton – you should write some posts on how a boy can become a Real, Ton-approved, Man!

    Like

  102. SFC Ton says:

    Key words mild disfigurement
    Like from spall, shock waves, bullets, fire, being fish hooked, broken noses, missing minor peices, knife wounds, various puncture wounds, cuts, surgeries, breaks, scraps…..plnes, trains, automobiles

    I’ve had girls see the damage and put their clothes back on

    Liked by 3 people

  103. Tarnished says:

    I’ve had girls see the damage and put their clothes back on.

    Are…are you being serious?
    I mean, I wouldn’t have sex with someone if they had an open/still healing wound for hygienic reasons. But scars? Meh. Whatever. They don’t bother me.

    My childhood friend/neighbor, Matt…his dad only had 1 eye due to an accident of some sort. He’d try to creep us out by leaving his eye patch off at dinner, but we all just thought it looked super badass. I had a long time customer at my old job who’d been in a housefire, and 1/3 of his face looked melted. One of my uncles has a wartime injury that almost took his entire left arm, leaving it severely mangled. And one of my few childhood female friends, Cate, was born without parts of her skull/cheekbones. And that’s not even touching on the animals I cared for who were missing or had “dead” limbs, beaks, tongues, eyes, wings, etc.

    I hope this doesn’t sound morbid, but I’d probably be utterly fascinated by all your “disfigurements” and want to know the story behind each one. Wounds are not gross unless they are weeping sores, those ick me out a bit, because I’ve had to clean maggots out of way too many injuries. Has to be done, but…blech.

    Liked by 1 person

  104. SFC Ton says:

    Yup and no eorries

    They can be startling, especially for girls who have only know safety and comfort

    Chicks dig scars, so they help too

    Liked by 3 people

  105. SFC Ton says:

    Ex Girl #1 caresses the spot where I still have buckshot in me when she if feeling particularly loving; Girl#2 never fails to kiss one of my facial scars when saying hello/ goodbye.

    Liked by 2 people

  106. Tarnished says:

    I guess I was just surprised to hear that after agreeing to sleep with you, they’d change their minds just because of some…unique body differences. It’s not like they found out you operate a dogfighting ring or something. Learning something disturbing/gross about someone’s personality would turn me off personally, not some unplanned physical modifications, lol.

    Liked by 1 person

  107. Tarnished says:

    See? That’s what I mean. They’re a part of you. Proof you are still alive.

    Liked by 1 person

  108. Ame says:

    the FP of INFP would come out, and i’d probably cry for you, which would probably piss you off … so it’d be better if i never saw them 😉

    i’m terrible w/tragic stuff and learned long ago that simple, basic info, with little to no graphics, is best … meaning i don’t watch the news … cause my heart breaks, and i cry, and i worry, and it drives.men.nuts (meaning husbands – both my first and now 🙂 ). was engaged w/first when that delta crash happened in dallas and was recovering from minor surgery so was home when it happened watching the news … BIG mistake. never did that again. i cried for days.

    Liked by 1 person

  109. Tarnished says:

    It’s similar to how some of my previous coworkers would ask what I see in Seamus, with him being 15 years older and 50+ lbs overweight. But it’s the person you love, not their body. Yeah, they have to be at least somewhat attractive to you, but that only goes so far, and as this conversation proves…shit happens to our physical parts. It’s about loving everything about ’em, not just how they look to others.

    Liked by 1 person

  110. SFC Ton says:

    I think there is a world of difference between initial attraction and what transpires down the road.

    I have no issues with my scars etc been a major minus

    Liked by 1 person

  111. SFC Ton says:

    Lol if I had a $100 for every time a medical professional said I was lucky to be alive I could pay Sumo ‘s bar tab
    Through in every time I heard them say you’ll never walk etc right again I could pay everyone’s bar tab

    Liked by 2 people

  112. I am glad to hear you say that Ton, in a very weird way, because my oldest’s dad is currently still in the hospital and people are saying how he won’t do this or that again and I just keep reminding his wife (and myself) that he’s a Viking and he will rise again and they just don’t know how stubborn he is. For example he is currently literally tied to the bed because he keeps getting up and ripping out all his IV’s and tubes and tries to leave even though he is nowhere near ready to go yet. I take the fact that he wants out of there as a very good sign. Even if it’s going to be awhile yet… He will…

    Like

  113. Ton I am sure you are quite terrifying! Lol. Good for you! What’s that saying? Don’t aim to leave a beautiful corpse…aim to skid to the finish an absolute glorious mess of live fully lived… Or something like that… 🙂

    Like

  114. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Bloom,
    Best wishes for your ex-husband. I don’t know how to interpret the trying to get up part but, I’ll take it as a good sign.

    Like

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: