Manipulation


Manipulation is a tool for trying to get what you want through the control of somebody else.  More often than not, the other person is somehow shortchanged in the process.  Over the course of time, when one person continually manipulates the other, resentment builds.  This resentment often results in many behaviors countering the attempts at manipulation; examples being leaving, withdrawing, fighting, counter-manipulation, etc.  None of these behaviors are good for any of the parties.  The situation becomes lose-lose.

But such long term results are the farthest from anybody’s mind when it all started.  Perhaps they were a young couple infatuated with each other.  One, either intentionally or accidentally, discovers that manipulation works with respect to the other.  They can get what they want rather effortlessly.  They did something, they got a reward, so they will likely do it again for a reward.  This is basic behaviorism psychology.  Again and again this happens, often without a deliberate decision to do so.  However, the more they do it, the more difficult it becomes to be successful.  They descend into a behavioral rut, so the natural response when in a rut is to double down.  This maybe kind of / sort of works, but the consequences mentioned in the first paragraph will probably be starting to manifest themselves.  Not good.

Since men typically tend to be more direct, and women indirect in their styles, manipulation is more of an issue with respect to them.  So it is something that they should always be on the watch for.  And if they see it in themselves, they should stop.  For their own sake, as well as for the sake of others.

Advertisements
Posted in FarmBoy, Lies, Marriage, Why
108 comments on “Manipulation
  1. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Early on, being on the recieving end of a “trick” might seem harmless or, even, cute. Not so, after a few decades.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Tarnished says:

    Early on, being on the recieving end of a “trick” might seem harmless or, even, cute.

    How so?

    Like

  3. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    If there is no malice and the advantage gained is small, then, it can be acknowleded.
    I guess, having done that, in the future, it would not be manipulation.

    Like

  4. Yoda says:


    Early on, being on the recieving end of a “trick” might seem harmless or, even, cute.

    How so?

    Probably depends on how cute the chick is.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Yoda,
    Mrs. Yoda 800 years with you she libes.
    Ever there any tricks she did play?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Tarnished says:

    Or what the trick is?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Tarnished says:

    One, either intentionally or accidentally, discovers that manipulation works with respect to the other. They can get what they want rather effortlessly. They did something, they got a reward, so they will likely do it again for a reward.

    Example of this there is?

    Liked by 1 person

  8. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn,
    Are you asking the cinnamon roll who has never been married?
    Yoda is not responding. 800 years married he is. Hmmmmm…..

    Liked by 1 person

  9. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    A recent video about crime in Berlin. It seems to have been building for years. according to this report. Same suspects.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. molly says:

    If I try as hard as Cill or Sumo in a scrap I totally bomb out! Reality, eh. I’m tough for my size tho, especially against females.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. Sumo says:

    I don’t fault wimminfolk for being manipulative; one has to use whatever weapons or tools at their disposal to achieve their goals. As far as I’m concerned, the fault lies with the idiot who falls for said manipulation.

    If I lose a fight (sorry to shatter your reality, but it could happen 😉 ), that indicates a lack of skill on my part. Same goes for someone who “gets” manipulated – their ability to protect their own interests is lacking.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Molly,
    Even though I know that you are not a Rainbow Furby in real life, it’s hard to imagine you getting in a scrap as the Rainbow Furby. You’re just too lovable. 🌯 🌯 🌯 🐻 🙄

    Liked by 2 people

  13. blurkel says:

    Manipulation is the feminine form of coercion. Few women have the physical attributes to use force whether real or implied as men do, so other means of getting her way had to evolve.

    A dead giveaway that manipulation is underway in one form involves implied sexual interest. The usual flirtation devices are utilized until the goal is achieved. Then, if the guy is lucky, he might get a brief moment of gratitude before she runs off to laugh at how stupid he was for falling for her lies.

    Another giveaway is the ridicule used as Farm Boy’s topic for Unrelenting. “Aren’t you man / smart / strong enough to do XYZ?” is the general form that takes. If he complies, he’s a chump. If he doesn’t fall for the ruse, then he’s talked about behind his back in some derogatory manner as if he had.

    Every man goes through these episodes at some time in his life. The only way to avoid any of this is to live isolated as a hermit. Few of us do live that way.

    Liked by 5 people

  14. Liz says:

    “If I try as hard as Cill or Sumo in a scrap I totally bomb out! Reality, eh. I’m tough for my size tho, especially against females.”

    Are you a scrapper, Molly? I’ve only been in one real fistfight in my life.
    Against two cunts. They outweighed me also. I won of course.

    Liked by 4 people

  15. Liz says:

    It was kind of like this:

    Except instead of physical bullying they’d make fun of me and get everyone else to also. They’d create stories about me and spread rumors. Then one day at the bus stop (because my stupid mother went down there to chastise them for being cunts, the worst thing that could ever happen to a kid is their mother coming down to defend them) they started making fun of my mom’s accent (chanting and so forth). I exploded. They never bothered me again. Later on (years later) they tried to suck up a lot.

    Liked by 5 people

  16. Yoda says:

    Against two cunts. They outweighed me also. I won of course.

    “Determination” powerful it can be

    Liked by 3 people

  17. Yoda says:

    Amazing how standing up to a bully changes things it can

    Liked by 2 people

  18. Yoda says:

    As far as I’m concerned, the fault lies with the idiot who falls for said manipulation.

    What if a feels not given the tools to see through manipulation he is.
    Common today this would be

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Yoda says:

    As far as I’m concerned, the fault lies with the idiot who falls for said manipulation.

    Clearly no “masculine imperative” there would be

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Yoda says:

    Blurkel probably has lots of fodder on this topic that add he could

    Liked by 3 people

  21. Yoda says:

    Wonder if Blurkel’s wife believes manipulation to be effective in the long term it is

    Liked by 2 people

  22. SFC Ton says:

    Just so Sumo, women do not posses superior IQ, they lack strength, speed, stamina fangs, claws etc but nature granted them a natural affinity for the second most dangerous weapon of all; deception

    The soul of a woman was born bellow and they are natural lairs, deceivers a psyops agents. Reason #3 women hate Game/ PUA is because men see through their mind games and actually play some back

    Liked by 1 person

  23. molly says:

    I get in scrpas as females hate me. I get the attention from the men they want. I’m strong and fit and can defeat several PPPs! (if I don’t try to be tougher than realistic).

    They beat me up so Cill taught me some tricks 😉 He didn’t at first as he worried I would go out and take risks. Not my fault, as they are violent against attractive females (especially immigrants and 10s). I have the right to walk to my bike in peace.

    Fuzzie!! 🌯 🌯 🌯 🌯
    Sumo 🙂 ! Liz in a fistfight YAY ! YO!! 😀 Luv ya Liz (I heard my mum exploded once. Protective eh)
    ❤ y'all 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

  24. Yoda says:

    Ms. Sarkersian does say

    Of course there isn’t a shred of truth to this perception, but for the people spreading it, the truth is irrelevant. The tweets, blogs and videos are designed to incite rage and enlist more people to join the crusade against me. They are designed to make me out as a powerful enemy of free speech who is determined to crush the expression of any idea she doesn’t agree with, and they conveniently support the perception some have created that I am not a feminist pop culture critic but rather some kind of diabolical supervillain, hell-bent on creating an oppressive society.
    This conspiracy and others like it are themselves a manifestation of misogyny, borne out of a deep distrust and hatred of women. They’re designed to foster fear and serve as a warning to other women about what awaits them if they challenge the status quo. Rather than replacing the pre-existing conspiracies, this new one fits neatly in with the others that have been and continue to be proliferated. It’s as if I’m a folk demon and this is yet another horror story people whisper to each other about me and, by extension, about what effects feminism may have on our culture if this imaginary menace is allowed to spread.

    http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2016/02/anita-sarkeesian-there-is-not-shred-of.html

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Yoda says:

    Molly the ultimate weapon she does have.
    An ice cream cone this would be

    Liked by 3 people

  26. Cill says:

    So who did ban Milo and McCain, eh? Eh?
    Pull the other one FFS
    Sarkersian is thick as pig shit.

    Liked by 3 people

  27. Cill says:

    Yoda at 5:33 pm
    Just reading that crap is an insult to man’s intelligence. Affirmative action plants education in the microcephalic heads of Sarkersian & co. It does no good. Once a moron, always a moron.

    Liked by 3 people

  28. Yoda says:

    A ice cream cone a product of patriarchy oppressed cows it is.

    Liked by 3 people

  29. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Anita as a supervillian? This has possibilities! Someone should share this with Marvel Comics. We could make Molly be the heoine. YAY!!!

    Anita and her fellow fembots have no idea of what they are playing with. Should they kill incentive in men, where will they be?

    Liz could be on the side of good too!

    Liked by 3 people

  30. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Liz,
    I believe that girls can be far more cruel than boys. Those two had to more than deserve it.

    Liked by 3 people

  31. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    FRom COTWA.
    http://www.cotwa.info/2016/02/victory-for-college-men-federal-court.html
    It would seem that hte antics of campus kangaroo courts are not considered funny when reviewed by real judges.
    Colleges are going to be paying out a lot.

    Liked by 3 people

  32. Yoda says:

    Should they kill incentive in men, where will they be?

    Still milk Matriarchy oppressed cows they could

    Liked by 2 people

  33. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    “Still milk matriarchally oppressed cows they could.”
    Indeed!

    I just got through reading this long post. I think that we are all opposed to this. Unfortunately, we are not politically represented.

    http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/02/political-power-single-women-c-v-r.html#.

    You would thing that there are more than enough married women and single men to call “bullshit” on this.

    Liked by 4 people

  34. Cill says:

    Anyone who employs Sarkersian or her ilk should be blacklisted on a database accessible to all.
    No-one should do business with anyone so lacking in judgement. No member of twitter should remain there. It’s an insult to all sound men of business.

    Liked by 6 people

  35. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    It is already happening.

    While they have brought back one of the founders to be CEO, they are losing talent fast.
    Isn;t it nice when you can be confirmed to be right so easily and quickly?

    Liked by 3 people

  36. Tarnished says:

    Liz and Molly,
    Glad to hear you stand up for yourselves. I also got in a few fights when I was younger, one of which was against a female bully who’d been an asshole towards me for a long time before she decided to escalate it to the physical one day. Though I hate fighting, I did win. She was very surprised, lol.

    The other 2 fights I was part of involved me helping to defend guy friends of mine from male bullies. Neither time had a distinct winner/loser because teachers broke it up after a short time, but I did take a few punches for my guys and got back up.

    I believe that girls can be far more cruel than boys.

    Boys are typically physical.
    Girls are typically mental and emotional. The pain they inflict follows this pattern.

    Liked by 4 people

  37. Tarnished says:

    This twitter debacle is amazing on so many levels. I’m gonna need popcorn…

    Liked by 4 people

  38. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn,
    Go to the store and buy a lot of it! Something tels me that facebook is next. It could be that it bounced off Liz’s froggie helmet.

    Liked by 3 people

  39. Farm Boy says:

    This conspiracy and others like it are themselves a manifestation of misogyny

    It is always misogyny. I wonder if spewing this same line is what is making her age fast.

    Kind of like Pinocchio and his nose.

    Liked by 5 people

  40. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    As long as she says it, someone will believe it. I, however, am getting tired of hearing this stuff which presumes that all men are demons and all women are angels.

    Liked by 3 people

  41. SFC Ton says:

    I cannot imagine SJW types engaged in useful work..#1 I doubt their mind runs to it and #2 employees have to see it a lawsuit in the making

    I hire a goodly number of women and just as important as looks is a good attitude toward men and life

    Liked by 5 people

  42. Farm Boy says:

    Milo,

    “There seems to be an undercurrent in the modern progressive movement of men who are so desperate to get laid that they say literally anything,” he explained. “Some of those things can involve demonising their own skin colour, sexuality, and gender simply in order to get plaudits from some of the most awful women on campus.”

    “It seems this particular progressive male feminism seems to have popped up only within the last couple of years, and you’ll see it sometimes on the pages of Vox and Buzzfeed and Gawker and Mic and terrible places like that, and it seems mainly a result of a failure in journalism,” he continued. “It’s a failure in the way that we as commentators and interpreters of the world are considering our role. Not as imparters of knowledge, or as people who are supposed to be out there and finding the truth, but rather journalism’s become about virtue signalling, and to too many of my colleagues the primary purpose of their job, what they get up to do in the morning, is to advertise their own moral virtue.”

    “Instead of telling us about the world as it really is, instead of telling us about what the problems are out there and the various different approaches to them might be, the function of the majority of journalism, particularly I have to say on the left, appears to be to advertise what nice right-thinking people we are and how much we hate sexism and racism and all that kind of thing,” he said.

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/02/23/3114451/

    Liked by 2 people

  43. Farm Boy says:

    This must have been uncomfortable,

    A Tuesday night town meeting in Spring Valley, NY devolved into chaos after a constituent accused Mayor Demeza Delhomme of having sex with his wife and ruining his marriage.

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/24/town-meeting-goes-0-100-after-constituent-accuses-mayor-of-having-sex-with-his-wife-video

    Liked by 1 person

  44. molly says:

    I’m at work and a PPP is bloew on the pavement. A shop very close to me sells big bonza blobby sploopy icecreams..
    (heh heh) 😄 grrrrrrr
    Lol

    Liked by 1 person

  45. molly says:

    Could I just drop the icecream in a cone so it sort of grazes her head with the icecream on the way down like bird poop it would count as littering, not assault with a deadly weapon? (heh heh) 😉

    Liked by 2 people

  46. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    Most city council meeting are enough to put insomniacs to sleep. This one was different.
    I have to confess that I took your lead in to mean that soeone was upset with the mayor having sex with his, the mayor’s, wife. That would have been strange but, people will object to anything.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. molly says:

    Yo! Tarn and Liz and me = The Cow Hitters!* We beat up on bovines! Cowards and Bullies look out.. PUNCH! BIFF! THUNK! KAPOW!
    HIT ‘EM AT ONE END, KICK ‘EM AT THE UDDER!!
    YO!! LOL

    (*better than She Hitters, eh 😉 )

    Liked by 2 people

  48. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Molly,
    It is terrible that you would waste good ice cream on these people.
    I like ice cream!!! 🌯 🌯 🌯 🐻 🙄
    I know what you need.

    Watch that and you will feel much better

    Liked by 3 people

  49. molly says:

    She Hitters might be pronounced “She ‘itters” by poms like a fav Unca of mine 😉
    That’s what I meant, eh.

    Liked by 2 people

  50. molly says:

    I feel not as fierce now, thanks Fuzzie. Give George an ‘armless ‘ug from me 🙄

    Liked by 2 people

  51. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Molly,
    Just in case.

    Liked by 2 people

  52. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Molly,
    I was worried. I would give Lonesome George a hug for you but, he’s in Delaware.
    Ice cream!!! Yummy!!

    Liked by 2 people

  53. Cill says:

    Fuzzy link at 9:15 pm “THE Single American Woman”

    Unmarried women, the most pampered, priviliged group in all history vote “way left”. Should we be surprised? Their group-think and in-group bias make a mockery of democracy. They are living proof that democracy is a failure. The only way to counteract this is for men to block vote as well. But we won’t. Men lack group bias and there are too many sycophants and manginas. Too many weak men and false leaders.

    MGTOW is the best choice. For most men this means “have as little to do with women as is politely possible.” For a minority of men (the hyper-aware ones) it means “I’ll have as much contact with women as suits my realistic purposes.”

    One thing we should not do is pine for the companionship of women. We should not long for LTR or a wife. We should definitely not seek it, expect it, or wait for it. Anyone who has any doubts about this should read “THE Single American Woman” again. Read the egocentric, ignorant shallowness of it, and lose all hope of ever deriving anything of value from such people.

    Liked by 4 people

  54. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    That article was an eye opener. I think with its publication, they are bubbling up to the surface of public awareness. If Hillary gets the nomination, the Presidential election may well turn on gender and the timing for Hillary is wrong. Politically, we need to turn to the right as Obama has been a disappointment. If Hillary loses and badly, the Democrats will have to rethink supporting fembots.

    I made a prediction months ago and it may turn out wrong. I was expecting a dark horse candidat4e to come out of nowhere and it would have happened about now. It didn’t.

    I don’t know if I can hold off romantically. I am sweet on girls. However, that creature who wrote that piece can’t be too keen on men. They may yet do themselves in.

    Liked by 1 person

  55. Farm Boy says:

    Unmarried women, the most pampered, priviliged group in all history vote “way left”. Should we be surprised? Their group-think and in-group bias make a mockery of democracy. They are living proof that democracy is a failure.

    It is odd that you bring that up. On Early Saturday Morning Patriarch Time, there will be a post that hits that from another angle.

    Liked by 4 people

  56. Farm Boy says:

    Take a look at this woman,
    And what she did,

    A woman at the centre of a paedophile ring which set children up as “sexual playthings” over more than a decade has been found guilty of offences including rape, conspiracy to rape and inciting a child to engage in sexual activity
    reports The Guardian.

    Ten people – six women and four men – had been on trial accused of the abuse of five children. Marie Black, from Norwich, was alleged to have been at the centre of the abuse.

    Black, 34, denied 26 charges during a three-month trial at Norwich crown court, but on Monday the jury convicted her on all but three counts after 19 hours of deliberations. She sobbed uncontrollably in the dock as the verdicts were delivered and was heard saying: “I’ve been stitched up.”

    … Opening the trial, prosecutor Angela Rafferty QC had said Black, previously known as Marie Adams, played an instrumental role in using the children as “sexual playthings”. The abuse, which is said to have happened in and around Norwich and London, included forcing the children to have sex with one another.

    On some occasions, the adults threw parties and played card games to decide who would abuse which child, Rafferty said. In interviews the victims described how they were abused in front of one another and other adults. Some of the abuse involved children’s toys, including Barbie dolls.

    They said the abuse became so routine that the victims came to accept it as normal. One of the male victims said: “There would be parties and they would do some games where the boys were in one room with the men and the girls were in another with the women. The adults would have a card game and the winner would get to choose a boy to start touching their private parts and then hurt them afterwards.”

    http://no-pasaran.blogspot.com/2015/08/a-woman-at-centre-of-paedophile-ring.html

    Liked by 3 people

  57. Mrs. Yoda says:

    Never manipulate Yoda I did
    Always see right through me he could have.
    Never it did it because right it is not

    Liked by 3 people

  58. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Boy,
    Oprah definitely subscribes to the maxim that no one ever went broke telling women what they want to hear. However, haw can women want to listen to all this man bashing? The title of that program tells it all.

    Mrs. Yoda,
    I can see that and I bet that it makes life easier, doesn’t tit?

    Liked by 2 people

  59. Tarnished says:

    However, haw can women want to listen to all this man bashing?

    Because they are misandrists, Fuzzie. Real misandrists and misogynists see the opposite sex as so alien, so different, so incomplete as human beings that they no longer are considered worthy of empathy, understanding, or kindness.

    https://tarnishedsophia.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/this-is-justice/

    Liked by 3 people

  60. Cill says:

    Oprah:
    When I was a little kid my mum sometimes listened to Oprah during the day “to keep up with the latest poison against fatherhood and men”. My mum despises Oprah as the woman who promoted and pushed the “recovered memory” farce, whereby an untold number of innocent men were subjected to witch trials in the courtroom of public opinion, and often in courts of law as well. The hysteria whipped up by Oprah led to male suicides and broken relationships between fathers and hysteria-pumped group-think daughters. Oprah trumpeted her conviction that “1 in 4 women were sexually abused [impliedly by their fathers], and that’s just the thin end of the wedge.” Long after it had gone beyond the ridiculous (fathers practicing satanism and eating the flesh of their helpless victims) Oprah kept pushing her man-hate agenda to higher levels of hysteria. Oprah is a hatemonger of the worst kind. It’s a disgrace that so many women – mostly white – keep following the bitch.

    So says my mum (except she would never use the word “bitch”).

    Liked by 4 people

  61. Liz says:

    “They said the abuse became so routine that the victims came to accept it as normal. One of the male victims said: “There would be parties and they would do some games where the boys were in one room with the men and the girls were in another with the women. The adults would have a card game and the winner would get to choose a boy to start touching their private parts and then hurt them afterwards.”

    Jesus. What. The. Fuck?

    Liked by 3 people

  62. SFC Ton says:

    Fuzzie women are misandrist nature so they eat that shit up
    They also are adverse to responsibility so they eat that shit up
    They also have no idea about men, or how/ why men value women so they eat that shit up

    the list could go one for miles

    Liked by 1 person

  63. Yoda says:

    Bad this is,

    “Corrupt police and an influential politician fuelled a culture of impunity that allowed three brothers to ‘own’ the town of Rotherham and abuse children until their crimes were exposed by The Times. One officer had sex with under-age girls, passed drugs to the sex-grooming gang and tipped them off when colleagues were searching for missing children, a court was told. Another helped to broker a deal in which one brother returned an abused girl to police after receiving an assurance that he ‘wouldn’t get done’. The jury was told that Jahangir Akhtar, the former deputy leader of Rotherham council, also took part in the handover at a petrol station. Mr Akhtar, the former deputy chairman of South Yorkshire police and crime panel, was a relative of Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras Hussain, who behaved for years ‘like a pack of animals’ to pursue dozens of young girls before demanding sex, often with threats of violence.”

    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article4698955.ece

    Liked by 2 people

  64. Yoda says:

    Seems like Cill write an “Evils of Oprah” post he should

    Liked by 2 people

  65. Yoda says:

    For people who have only a small part of their butt that hurts it does,

    The University of Michigan-Flint has launched a website where “students who experience any form of bias or micro-aggressions whatsoever” can tattle on members of their community.

    In a campus-wide email sent Tuesday afternoon (and shared with the Washington Examiner), UM-Flint staff announced the new website and encouraged students, faculty and staff to begin reporting. They can even do so anonymously.

    “At UM-Flint, we have a strong commitment to diversity and equity, and we strive to ensure that every student is able to participate and thrive in a culture of inclusion,” the email said. “Reporting bias against students is important because it allows us to keep track of how individual students and groups are experiencing our campus community, and better positions us to provide closely informed responses that will ensure an optimal living and learning environment for everyone.”

    The entire community was called upon to report incidents of bias they witness, even if they weren’t the recipient of the alleged bias. Adding in that reports can be done anonymously, UM-Flint could predictably become a hotbed of politically and personally motivated revenge reports.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/university-introduces-website-to-report-microaggressions/article/2584111

    Liked by 2 people

  66. Tarnished says:

    Jesus. What. The. Fuck?

    Learned helplessness, Liz.

    Oprah is a hatemonger of the worst kind. It’s a disgrace that so many women – mostly white – keep following the bitch.

    Yup.

    Liked by 3 people

  67. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn,
    I followed your link and read your post. While Katherine Kieu Becker deserves biblical punishment, an eye for an eye won’t work in this case. At least she is in jail. I don’t think that Lorena Bobbit served so much as a day.
    I still am haunted by the laughter on the “The View”. Hatred of men at that level shouldn’t be mainstream.

    Cill,
    You’re right about Oprah and she has made a large fortune doing it.

    Liked by 3 people

  68. Tarnished says:

    While Katherine Kieu Becker deserves biblical punishment, an eye for an eye won’t work in this case.

    I can think of a way, Fuzzie, but it’d involve highly invasive surgery and probably be considered an “inhumane” punishment. Because what she did is an example of morality, right? /sarcasm

    I still am haunted by the laughter on the “The View”. Hatred of men at that level shouldn’t be mainstream.

    It is the stuff of nightmares, that laughter. I literally felt bile in the back of my throat first time I saw that clip. Disgusting.

    Liked by 3 people

  69. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn,
    I think the women ao The View dehumanized the victim to the point where they could laugh as one would do when Wile E. Coyote gets into trouble. This si a technique that is usually reserved for war. The last it was employed was against the Japanese in WWII.
    We may be sitting on a powder keg.

    Like

  70. Cill says:

    Yoda at 1:25 pm
    Leftist Law applies.

    Value and innocence shall be rated by distance removed from the straight white male, the greater the distance the higher the rating.

    Defenseless young white women and girls share whiteness and race with the straight white male, much more than does the Muslim criminal. Therefore they rate lower in value and innocence (and therefore higher in guilt) than the non-white men who drug and enslave and rape them. Ranking higher in guilt than her Muslim rapists, she is ultimately to blame for the atrocities and paedophilia they inflict upon her. Even if she’s only 8 years old, she deserves it.

    Such is the true nature of the Left, when stripped to reveal its festering core of lies and hatred.

    Liked by 2 people

  71. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    People who think consciously aong those lines can’t be considered sane.
    While some thought in line with what you have proposed must be going on, it can’t be conscious.
    In the meanwhile, Judgybitch had someone fromaAustrailia write a guest post.
    http://judgybitch.com/2016/02/25/guest-post-australias-child-bride-problem/
    It is likely true and feminists don’t care.

    Like

  72. Cill says:

    Fuzzy they are not sane. The lunatics are running the asylum. That’s the whole point.

    Liked by 1 person

  73. Cill says:

    That is the way the authorities in Rotherham approached it BTW. They looked upon the white girls as scum who deserved the treatment they received. I see a similar sort of attitude in the feminist governments of Europe, toward the sexual abuses white women and boys suffer there from Muslim men every day.

    Liked by 3 people

  74. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Cill,
    To entertain delusions on the level you described is not far off from trying to eat soup with a knife. How do these people function in life?

    Liked by 1 person

  75. Cill says:

    Fuzzy, I replaced “culpability” with “innocence” at 7:54 pm, otherwise it didn’t make sense.

    “How do these people function in life?” They can’t function rationally. The airy-fairy doctrine of the Patriarchy is so tangible to them, it drives them beyond obsession. Imagine being in the Police or on the Rotherham Council, and the whereabouts of a missing girl comes to your notice. So you contact people you know will abuse her, and inform them of her location. You want her to be raped and treated by a bunch of Muslim scum like one of their goats. You and they know very well that you informed them for that very purpose. There’s no other way of looking at it. These lefties are inferior people.

    Liked by 3 people

  76. Spawny Get says:

    A deeper look into the college abyss

    Liked by 4 people

  77. SFC Ton says:

    http://www.kshb.com/entertainment/38-the-spot-kmci/new-app-splits-up-dinner-bill-based-on-wage-inequality-1

    the app figures out how much a woman should pay for a meal and women only pay 78 cent per dollar because they belive in the income inequality lie; well fuck for men who are dating thats a huge improvement over women paying 0 cents per dollar of the meal

    Liked by 2 people

  78. Tarnished says:

    Which is just sad, Ton, because I thought that myth was disproved over 15 years ago.

    “Paying 0 cents”? Lol. Certainly the opposite of what I do.

    How many dates with a woman who thinks she doesn’t have to pay anything at all does it take before the average man “nexts” the gal?
    3? 5? The very first?

    Liked by 1 person

  79. Cill says:

    “How many dates with a woman who thinks she doesn’t have to pay anything at all does it take before the average man “nexts” the gal?
    3? 5? The very first?”

    0
    zero

    (I thought it was time I started contributing to these dating discussions)

    Liked by 3 people

  80. Cill says:

    Spawny, where in the name of all that’s civil did you get that Rottweiler from?

    Liked by 3 people

  81. Farm Boy says:

    It must have took lots of soul searching for a University to fire a woman.

    Liked by 3 people

  82. Farm Boy says:

    There is a new post

    Liked by 1 person

  83. Spawny Get says:

    Cill, Breitbart comments…blame them.

    Liked by 1 person

  84. Spawny Get says:

    Farm Boy,

    Some people say that gingers like mzzzz Klick don’t have souls.

    Wise people know better, gingers have all the souls they stole from decent folk.

    Liked by 1 person

  85. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I wouldn’t condemn Melissa Click on her hair color. What I find hard to swollow is that it took this long to fire her. A man would be told to pack up and leave as soon as he was identified. There was another female employye of Mizzou whpo participated and was identified. I doubt she even got a letter of reprimand.

    We’re on the ball here. I was thinking to link the story but, you guys are fast.

    Tarn,
    You’re unique. I have only dated one gal that negotiatied the check. She kind of had to because she got a take out meal for her Mom.

    Cill,
    You can post almost anything on youtube. There are some horrrible bear videos.

    Liked by 2 people

  86. SFC Ton says:

    for most guys Tarn? A life time

    Most guys never get flirted with or anything like that so its likely impossible for you to understand how the game is played out

    Liked by 1 person

  87. Tarnished says:

    That is also sad, but in an entirely different way. I know this is repeated often here, but men should not let themselves be used or made to feel like walking ATMs.

    Liked by 1 person

  88. SFC Ton says:

    LOL Triumph the insult dog has been around for what? 20 years?
    He’s pretty tame these days

    Liked by 2 people

  89. Spawny Get says:

    Only kidding about the gingers…

    Liked by 1 person

  90. SFC Ton says:

    ahhh but they are told being the nice guy etc is the real way to win a “fair maiden” and all the girls who dont respond to his niceness are broken (by evil men?) like PUA….. which would mean every woman breathing

    Liked by 3 people

  91. Yoda says:

    Patriarch kind of ginger looking he is

    Liked by 2 people

  92. Yoda says:

    ahhh but they are told being the nice guy etc is the real way to win a “fair maiden”

    Perhaps fair she might be.
    But in modern days, a maiden she is probably not

    Liked by 2 people

  93. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Spawny Get,
    People have strong feeling about red hair. It may be on the same order as Marmite. 🙂

    Tarn,
    How many dates? Whie Bloom objects to the three date rule, here is another sound reason for it.

    Liked by 3 people

  94. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Yoda,
    The nice guy will have no fortune with the fair maiden. She carries a torch for the Black Knight.

    Liked by 1 person

  95. Tarnished says:

    There’s a huge gap between being a nice guy vs a doormat, though.
    I like nice guys, and soft guys, and roundish-shaped guys, and nerdy/awkward guys…but even I don’t like guys who let others walk on top of them or take ’em for granted.

    Or to put it more accurately, I’m not attracted to doormats but I do feel sorry for them and wish they could grow a backbone.

    Liked by 3 people

  96. Tarnished says:

    Tarn,
    You’re unique. I have only dated one gal that negotiatied the check. She kind of had to because she got a take out meal for her Mom.

    One?! Omg…I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

    And here one of the reasons I don’t want to have another luver-guy in my life is that I can’t frelling afford it! 💸💸

    Liked by 1 person

  97. Tarnished says:

    Tarn,
    How many dates? While Bloom objects to the three date rule, here is another sound reason for it.

    Bloom, I believe, objects to it due to the threat of a woman increasing her N unnecessarily with a charming cad who will then leave after successfully getting the “milk”.

    I don’t care about N nearly as much by itself, but am leery of the 3 Date Rule because it is difficult for me to imagine knowing someone well enough after such a short time that it’d be appropriate/comfortable to share such an intimate and vulnerable activity. Though I don’t pedestalize one’s pussy (or penis) as “golden” or whatever term the ‘sphere is using now, I’m afraid I do hold the acts of Sex and Sensuality in very high regard.

    However, by date 3 I’d have initiated little attraction indicators like hand holding, kissing, nuzzling, or scalp/neck caresses. ❤

    Liked by 1 person

  98. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn
    Tha tsame reasoning keeps a lot of men monogamous.
    I do have to add another. I would buy movie tickets and she ould buy drinks and popcorn.

    Liked by 1 person

  99. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Tarn,
    In my discussions with Bloom on the matter, I proposed that it didn’t have to be sex but, the man has to have some assurance that this is going somewhere.

    Liked by 1 person

  100. Tarnished says:

    I proposed that it didn’t have to be sex but, the man has to have some assurance that this is going somewhere.

    I’d agree with this, especially if he was the “seeking commitment” sort. Wouldn’t be fair otherwise.

    Liked by 1 person

  101. SFC Ton says:

    not really. a nice guy as define now is being a doormat

    Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: