Are people from other parts of the feminist world noticing all the roly-poly solo mums and their ugly pudgy bubbas?
Hypergamy supposedly is selection of superior genes and therefore improvement. You’d think that the more rampant the hypergamy, the more rapid and noticeable the improvement should be.
Not when it comes to physical attractiveness, alas. Everywhere I go on the ground, I see a splurge of unprepossessing new children.
Is hypergamy being offset by female promiscuity? Are PUA and “game” enabling ugly buggars to get their foot in the door? On top of this, female drunkenness is much more commonplace than it used to be, impairing women’s judgement. Women might be “spreading it around” more than we think, and having taxpayer-supported kids by ugly men. It could be that the people with the genes for attractiveness or intelligence are a declining percentage of today’s breeders.
I say “or intelligence” because some men have rationally and dispassionately decided that the feminist world is too much of a shit hole to bring children into. I know quite a few intelligent, attractive men who have come to that conclusion. What percentage do they make up of the attractive intelligent male population? Who knows. If personal observation is anything to go by, it’s a significant percentage and rising.
Perhaps smart alphas are reducing their interaction with women. They’d surely be justified in doing so. All a woman has to do is name a man as the father to make him liable for child support. He then has the hassle of proving he’s not the dad. If he is the biological father and he bonds with the child, he runs the risk of the mother depriving him of his fathering role at the drop of a hat. All she has to do is accuse him of abuse and he’ll have to get out and stay away from his children until he can prove himself innocent. I don’t care how lawyers try to rationalize it away, I’ve seen it happen too many times: Fatherhood is effectively at the mercy of women.
The crazy rules of interaction between the sexes are imposed by and for women. Micro-aggressions. The way a man sits, the way he walks and talks, the way he looks at a woman… The female accuser dictates and determines the officially accepted narrative (mattress girl). She is the prosecutor, judge, and jury.
An alpha might be unwilling to submit himself to so much control, and the way for a man to avoid the slavery is to avoid the slavers and keep his assets, his genes, to himself. It’s getting easier and easier for him to do this now, women are so hell-bent on making themselves repellent. Most of us men are sure not going to change the way we walk and talk just to pander to the narcissism of a bunch of control freak bitches. Hell no. If they can’t take me as I am they can go piss themselves.
It so happens that the women in my life do take me as I am, otherwise they wouldn’t be in my life. However, Feminism would most certainly take exception to me because I am white, male, straight, and masculine. To add insult to injury, I am into STEM. I belong to the category of man the fembots most want to stamp out. We are creative and independent and do not want for female companionship. Fembots are doing their utmost to marginalize us and I believe that in many cases it is repulsive to men and having an effect on the gene base.
There might be no decline in the gene base after all. The uglification process might be just a fattening process. Perhaps it’s only my dislike of obesity, this plague of land whales and fatted stroller-calves.
Following a comment by Bloom at 15 December, 2015 at 12:22 am, I have added the following:
I think unintelligent unattractive women, at least as much as their male counterparts, are lowering the quality of the gene base.
With the decline of marriage, women with a stronger sense of responsibility, who also tend to be more intelligent, are having less children.