What Men Must Never Know

Recently commenter BuenaVista stated,

A man toying with a woman or rejecting a woman is revealing her sexual impulses and the manner in which she has trivialized her sexual activity. For it is truly trivial. This is incompatible with the image of the ‘strong empowered woman’ who practices ‘amazing empowered sex’. You know, while blotto at 11 in the morning at the tailgate before the football game with the older brother of some guy she just met at 8 in the same morning.

Now, any man who reveals that behavior, or in fact reveals and illustrates it (as in the case of Mattress Girl, whose illiterate and vulgar pleas for her vague male friend to do her up the ass were publicly shared) must go down.

This just happened in Asheville, NC. Two guys own a coffee shop and they kept an anonymized record of their PUA adventures; they tracked their ‘notch count’ and all the other bullshit that the keyboard lotharios track at Heartiste or RoK. Apparently they were pretty good at picking up the hippy chicks that predominate in Asheville. Their behavior was tacky, as was their belief that should should brag about it — if anonymously. (I suggest that if you’re going to be an asshole, Asshole Game works better if you don’t publish your playbook on the internet.)

Someone outed them and the entire male and female feminist apparatus descended on them. I think they’ll have to sell their shop and leave town. They had a loan to open a second shop and the lender was trying to rescind it. Protesters lined the sidewalk in front of their business and warned everyone to stay away from the heinous sexual abusers. (I am not current on this story, maybe they’re dead by now, or at least working for free at the LGBTQ Recreation Center.)

Now let’s think about this for a moment. Were they attacked because they had sex with a stream of willing strange women who wanted to have sex? Yes, they were. But was it truly that or was it because they held up a mirror to current female sexual impulses and behavior? I think it was very clearly the latter that made them the target of the mob. Because if women write an anonymized blog about their random sexual experiences with a train of willing boys, they’re “cool.” But these men reveal that they’re boffing happy willing chicks in the restroom of their coffee shop, an hour after meeting them, and they are “abusers.” There are no accusations of forced sex here, just claims that the women are victims because … because … they got what they wanted?

Don’t hold up a mirror to modern feminism unless you’re ready for the long knives. The same thing is happening to anyone willing to publicly discuss the Planned Parenthood videos about their body parts salvage yard action

A few years ago at Sunshine Mary’s old blog, regular commenter Joseph of Jackson told his story.  He was attending a church and was the leader of a single men’s group there.  He paid money to attend a PUA seminar, and came back with considerable skills.  He tested these new skills out, and somewhat surprisingly they worked very well.  He started teaching these skills in a G rated movie manner (no pump ‘n dump, use them as a path to marriage) to his single men’s group.  Amazingly the young women of the church started responding positively to these young men, when before they all but ignored them.  The older women of the church got wind of this, and put up a big fuss.  Eventually after a show trial, Joseph of Jackson was booted from the church.  The men of his single’s group all left with him.

What was the primary objection?  It was one that nobody could articulate, but everybody could vaguely sense.  Even though the young men were not sinning in the church’s view, they had to go.  For they exposed what BuenaVista discussed above.  With the correct buttons pushed, women can be easy lays.  And men in general are not supposed to know the buttons.

Blogger Julien O’Dea wrote a post about what the real problem was.  Quoting from his post,

“I think women lie to men about what really turns women on, perhaps because they are doing what Steve Moxon has written about. They are “policing the hierarchy”. They don’t want ordinary men to know, because knowledge is power. They would prefer that only elite men know these things and preferably that they know them intuitively. If every clueless guy is told the truth, it means that a man has been helped, who in the eyes of many women does not deserve to know. Women just expect men to know without being told.”

Basically, if every schlub knew the tricks to pushing women’s buttons, then how would they pick out the “real men” who tinglate them?  And we can’t have that?  Or can we?

Posted in FarmBoy, HowTo, Hypergamy, Lies
73 comments on “What Men Must Never Know
  1. Farm Boy says:

    What if every man had this knowledge?

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Tarnished says:

    And we can’t have that?  Or can we?

    You can, up to a point.
    Like men, individual women have different tastes in men. Traits that get the motors running for Woman A, B, H, Q, and Z might leave Woman C and S completely unfazed, plus utterly disgust Woman K.

    For example, I typically like guys who are slightly overweight, 10+ years older, gamer/nerdy types, usually but not always white with light eyes/hair like myself. I prefer to pay for things, so what they make doesn’t matter. My younger sister only dates muscular Hispanic or black guys who drive fast cars, have tattoos like her, and are no more than 3-4 years older otherwise it’s “creepy”. Same age restriction goes for our youngest sister, but she likes heavily tanned white guys with “an education” and who like to give her jewelry. See? It’s not even consistent in families! 😛

    But perhaps if a man is looking for a certain type of woman, it would behoove him to act in a way that would attract such a type. The only issue in that case, which we touched on a bit in the comments last post, is the problem of change. Except this isn’t about one’s SO trying to force a change…it’s the male changing himself to theoretically become more attractive to the female. Obviously that’s fine if he wants to actually alter himself. If a guy wants to press a particular type of woman’s buttons, yeah, totally go ahead and do what it takes so long as it doesn’t hurt anyone (himself included).

    But then what if he finds someone who he truly considers LTR material? Will he slowly let down the facade to show his true self? Will he just have to keep acting the same way, week after week after week, regardless of if he gets tired of doing so? Or will he have been wearing said “mask” for so long that it’s now his real personality? Just something I’ve wondered about PUA types who advocate for drastic self-change…


  3. Tarnished says:

    What if every man had this knowledge?

    Sounds good. Isn’t this a big part of what the manosphere at large is for, or used to be?

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Farm Boy says:

    Tarn is a unicorn. So yes, her tastes no doubt differ from the norm.

    It would seem that her sisters are not unicorns.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Thanks to Fuzzie I now know Russian women PUA techniques. Oops, I dropped my keys (lingering sexpot stare…gyrates up the stairs on teetering heels)

    Liked by 4 people

  6. Do the teetering heels trigger some kind of “tackle her!” Response or what’s w heels?

    Liked by 3 people

  7. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Farm Bo0y,
    I am still furious about the way Joseph of Jackson was treated. Giving his “boys” enough confidence to talk a church girl into walking down to Mel’s Drive In to split a malted milk shake? How terrible is that? I never though abhout it until now but, the harpies that got him tossed out had probably dialed down sex for their husbands to once every two months.
    This is so sick!

    That was a cute video. Dropping the keys reminded me of a 19th century girl dropping a handerkercheif.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I am going to go out on a limb and make a guess about you.
    You are taller than average. You don’t need to appear taller to attract tall men. High heels are popular in Eastern Europe.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Those biddies should have been advising the young ladies to be nice to the boys and not worried about what the boys were doing!

    Liked by 3 people

  10. I am 5’6″ Fuzzie, neither tall not short. I don’t wear heels too often but perhaps like Liz says I need some good ones. Otherwise they are for show only! Ditched as soon as possible!

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Tarnished says:

    Hey, I’m about the same height as you, Bloom! 5’7″ here. Hate heels…my balance is in the negatives with them on, lol.

    As for the “purpose” of heels, weren’t they originally worn by menfolk to be slightly more subtle…ah…codpiece indicators? I don’t know why they are worn exclusively by women now though. Maybe to give emphasized swing to the hips?


  12. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I don’t know what those “biddies” were thinking about the church girls propects. I think that they care more for appearance that anything else.

    This post has my blood boiling. Those Asheville coffee shop gals who gave it up in munutes would make Steady Eddy wait seven dates for a good night kiss at the door.
    Dr. Helen Smith is right. Men should go on strike. This is beyond ridiculous. It’s even beyond insulting.
    Could that be what the fembots are truly trying to cover up?

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Tarnished says:

    It would seem that her sisters are not unicorns.
    To be fair, our brother isn’t much better. The last 2 girls he’s dated have been conventionally pretty, but painfully empty headed. The new one he’s seeing is a bit more down to earth though, so here’s hoping…

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Yoda says:

    Mrs. Yoda is short like I am.
    She needs high heels not

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Yoda says:

    As long as reach the sammiches she hands to me, then good I am.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Height is not a handicap for your wife. She can levitate herself or the sandwich ingredients while humming a Jon Williams’s tune.

    I am still boiling over the Asheville coffee shap gals. Stories like that get out and good men should just conclude that they are schmucks.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. @ fuzzie my guess is hippy chicks see guys who own a coffee shop as some sort of hypergamy catch. Plus hippy chicks are not really known for being…ummmmm…not sure what word to choose…

    Liked by 3 people

  18. Yoda says:

    If look taller one does want,
    then wear hat one might

    Liked by 2 people

  19. SFC Ton says:

    It incites the prey drive in men who haven’t been netured

    Known why women hate red pill/ pua skills?
    Red pill cuts through their deception campaign
    Pua skills transfer sexual power to men

    Which leaves women with jack and shit in the smp

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Tarnished says:

    This post has my blood boiling. Those Asheville coffee shop gals who gave it up in minutes would make Steady Eddy wait seven dates for a good night kiss at the door.

    Which is probably true, but still weird. Sexual attraction is pretty cut and dry, usually. Either you can see yourself sharing sex with someone or you can’t. Why jump one guy immediately but not another, if they’re both of similar attractiveness?


  21. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I do remember Deti relating a story in a comment. This was while he was in college, a gal who he respected told him that the were two kinds of men, the kind a gal has fun with and the kind she marries. The sense that I got is that the kind she has fun with is superior.
    We;re chumps.

    If people were taller, would their feet reach the ground?


  22. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    COTWA has good things to say about Ashe Schow.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    To take it full circle backi to the title of this post, “What Men Must Never Know”, is that they are played. Worse, the better their intentions, the worse they get played.
    Back to the cave for head scratching.

    Liked by 2 people

  24. Spawny Get says:

    you know things are bad when they start telling women bad news about their window of fertility

    TheLocal.dk reports the comments of Ninna Thomsen, Copenhagen’s deputy mayor for health, who says the film should prompt young people to start a family earlier, while they are still in education. At present, it is most common for couples to wait until they have finished university, landed their dream jobs, and bought a house – and even then a desire to climb the career ladder can put many women off having children at all.

    Liked by 3 people

  25. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Spawny Get,
    It may well prove that the most destructive effect of feminism is demographic winter. That Breitbart post mentioned three countries whose replacement rate was 1.3. When it slips that low, it may not come back.
    Keep your eyes on Japan. They are ten years ahead of us, demographically. Right now, adult diapers are out selling infant diapers.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Toy Soldier posts about everyone’s favorite diversity officer.


    Liked by 1 person

  27. Liz says:

    Re: Heels. Heels improve the shape of the leg and create a sexy posture. They’re never going to feel like running shoes but they’re always going to look better than flats. Every woman should have a couple of comfortable pairs (imports from Italy or Spain, not the cheapy Chinese versions). I have sneaker heels and boots that are just about as comfortable as a sport shoe (and they were JUST as comfortable when I was younger…before long hours of running around on the concrete hospital floor and standing for long period of time ruined my feet). For winter, put on some stockings and a nice pair of casual comfortable heels with a sweater dress. You’ll be comfortable, the look is effortless and sexy as hell.
    /pua Liz out 😛

    Liked by 4 people

  28. SFC Ton says:

    So I was a shindig last night, a charity affair at a hospital Ton Spawn Production Facility contracts to

    Any rate I ended up getting stuck at this table with a big boobstep, pleasant faced blonde chic with a worthless phd in social work who runs this group that is like a clearing house for homeless women to get all their government loot. At some point she asked me like my opinion on the homeless crisis! It’s always a crisis….. my reply was “end feminism and return women and children to their proper position as property of father’s and husbands ”

    Ooooo the angry tingles that created, but also in short order the table was very close to openly admitting the truth of my statement

    The real lesson their is frame. Women and men bend to a strong masculine frame, more so if your frame comes with a smile on your face and humor in your eyes

    Liked by 1 person

  29. SFC Ton says:

    When I am King of the Confederacy I will have Liz design the lady’s fashion portion of the national women’s study program. As in when bitches learn to be women, ladies and brood mares

    Liked by 1 person

  30. BuenaVista says:

    My oh-so deep thoughts on heels:

    Elongate the legs, accentuate the butt. They’re not shoes, they’re display tools. (Female peacocking.) Some women wish to be desirable sex objects. I hear some of them wear push up and/or bras, too, for no practical reason.

    Status indicator (e.g., Manolos: “My husband can drop $700 on thoroughly impractical shoes, the primary purpose of which is to make men want to take them off, while making my girlfriends remark.”)

    Socio-economic statement, related to status indicator: “Other people do the work around here, for me, obviously. I can hardly walk in these things.”


    I think the core information that men must never know is they are categorized by women and utilized (or ignored) accordingly. And secondly, that the supposedly more sexually moderate, discerning sex will drop trou without thought or reservation or social constraint for the right man. Sex pozzie feminism has thrown this latter behavior center state, though it remains BadSpeak to mention it. (E.g., the hurled slurs and profanity at anyone laughing at a Slut Walk.)

    The three categories are 1. Fuck him. 2. Marry him. 3. Fuck off and die, loser. I suppose, in a churchian context, it becomes very alarming to the matrons who run the joint when the rhetoric of chaste “marry him” is conflated with Christian calls for a man who serve her as she serves Jesus — along with some hidden conversations about proper blowjob technique. Also it would disturb the matrons’ view of the world if the beta boy parishioners actually had some social leverage with women, and weren’t brainwashed and handcuffed into wifing up the first female who agreed to indenture him. If they were thrown out of the church, I’ll bet this latter played a role. Freedom isn’t free.

    Liked by 5 people

  31. BuenaVista says:

    Here is some good female propaganda that men are suppose to be dazzled by: it’s a great illustration of female misdirection plays, outright falsehoods, and anti-intellectual mush. While it reads like an 11th grader’s fantasy of the Strong, Sensitive, Nobel Empowered Woman (as modified by too many hours listening to Taylor Swift), the author teaches and is tenured at a Big Ten university and holds a Ph.D.

    This person was in my online dating inbox this a.m. and I am quoting her word-for-word.

    What men are not supposed to understand is that this utopian, Kahlil Gibran-level, juvenile bullshit is not her point. Her point is to find a man of resources, shoulders and functioning junk to enable her self-dramatizing, vanity lifestyle. But that is not the Intermediary Self she presents to the world. We are supposed to believe the bullshit, but deliver money, sex, and status.

    “I have a range of interests and do not fit any one stereotype. My work is important to me – I do what I believe in – therefore, it is who I am, it is not just “a job.” My work does not have a beginning and end but it is part of the natural flow of my life versus an intense obsession. I am humbled and honored by the doors that have been opened!”

    –BV Translation: “I am too cool to be summarized as ‘Middle-aged university professor, rather short, practical feminist-signaling haircut, you probably know the type. You should be 12″ taller than I, ideally, with a BMW, and be out of my league. Also, just because you have a balance sheet and I work for $105K does not mean I’m just another ephemeral academic working for $105K per year. Business people are so mundane and tawdry.'”

    “My children are young women now and well on their own way to be part of this world in a healthy and wise way. I am excited for both of them and love traveling to see them or planning trips with them – to catch up. We have had a significant amount of time together and we are good at it but it is time for all of us to continue our walk differently.”

    BV Translation: “Well, I have adult children, I guess that is somewhat embarrassing since I want to come on as a Crazy 20-Something (think Jennifer Lawrence with an MLA membership) with a few publications to my name; age is just a number!; let’s revert to Gibran and not say the girls have jobs on the other side of the country, but they’re on a ‘Walk’ or a ‘Journey.'”

    “Who am I looking for. .. or what is important to me in a partner is not going to be conclusive; as, chemistry and connection may trump a list of characteristics. Someone who enjoys biking, hiking, and camping (although great hotels are also fun) and likes planning trips (both in the US and internationally). I enjoy learning and would want to be with someone who too enjoys learning new things and has knowledge and opinions about world events. Someone who is comfortable and secure with who he is. Life energy is great – but not in a way where we are just checking off bucket list items – it’s about the walk.”

    BV Translation: “You should be hot, allow me to plan trips overseas that you pay for (as a Strong Independent Woman, I’ll pay for the camping trips), express fascination with anything that fascinates me me me, and have “life energy”, which means you wax mystical while we stare at the sunrise and discuss the latest NPR broadcast. And, “it’s about the Walk”, again.”

    “I believe in a world that is socially just and work toward that vision. I would want a partner with similar core values, someone who believes that we have a responsibility to make the world a better place (in whatever way we can). I am looking for someone who can give care without hesitation, who is able to unleash his love and celebrate us – fearlessly.”

    BV Translation: “I’m an SJW, which makes me a superior human being. We lie about everything, including ourselves. Also, I use weird syntax and diction to value signal my special-specialness (‘give care’).”

    “I want to be able to move effortlessly through the world with a partner and my equal. How we respond to the world around us is significant. Do you bring peace and compassion to situations through understanding? Can you find the humor in everyday situations.”

    BV Translation: “I am your equal, which means I’ll call the shots and you will celebrate my moral preening about “peace and compassion”. Whatever you do, don’t ever call me on my bullshit. Or laugh.”

    “Can you make me smile?”

    BV Translation: “If you’re still reading, and notwithstanding the foregoing, can you make me (an aging shorty with a Hillary Clinton haircut) wet and provide serial orgasms on my demand and command?”

    Liked by 4 people

  32. Spawny Get says:

    BV, what red blooded man could resist that? Offer of a lifetime, I tell you

    Liked by 4 people

  33. Liz says:

    LOL That was hilarious, BV.

    (actually, at first I thought your preceding paragraph was the first part of her response. I thought to myself, “We have a winner” wow, how refreshingly honest, and almost stood up and cheered. But then I realized that was just your bit)

    Perhaps you could just send a brief message out to the internet dating site world:
    “Send me your champion”



  34. BuenaVista says:

    She’s the secular, New Agey version of empowered churchian feminists Dalrock discusses this week.

    Also, being so dynamic and all, she prefers younger men (of course).

    Well, in this edifice of cognitive dissonance, the challenge is turn the noise filter up to max and ask oneself, “Do you think she would ever shut up?”


  35. Yoda says:

    BV Translation: “I’m an SJW, which makes me a superior human being. We lie about everything, including ourselves. Also, I use weird syntax and diction to value signal my special-specialness (‘give care’).”

    Superior they are not.
    Lie they do.
    Special syntax notice I do not.
    All you non-green people alike you do sound.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Yoda says:

    you will celebrate my moral preening about “peace and compassion”

    Preen they do.
    The world see their awesomeness they must.
    But awesome they are if their solutions miserably they do fail?

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Yoda says:

    “Do you think she would ever shut up?”

    Spread her awesomeness far and wide desire she would.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. SFC Ton says:

    I want to go on the record and state the Ton ‘s woman’s studies program would be more then teaching them to look good, take a dick well and spit out babies

    They would learn to cook, clean, plan a menu, basic 1st aide and such

    Liked by 1 person

  39. SFC Ton says:

    LOL BV, did you respond?

    Some thing like ” can I get the number of some of the slots in your class? I’don’t Rather bang the young bitches in your class before you ruin them vs sticking my cock in some hag who wasted her life on dumbshit like social justice ….”


  40. Yoda says:

    Wonder which better for society it would be?
    Ton’s Women’s Studies or regular Women’s Studies?


  41. SFC Ton says:

    Does one have to wonder or are you being all mystical and jedi-ish?

    Liked by 1 person

  42. Yoda says:

    has knowledge and opinions about world events. Someone who is comfortable and secure with who he is

    Desires Ton she does.


  43. SFC Ton says:

    LOL they all do Master Yoda but few qualify

    Liked by 1 person

  44. BuenaVista says:

    Nah, Ton, I’m still sober. Every day remains squat day.

    Tho I was bombed last week and did ask one geriatric fantasist, ‘Does this ever work for you?’

    More seriously, we know that feminists want to control men by requiring men to desire women in a manner women define. And we know that women still want what they’ve always wanted (Marlon Brando in The Wild Ones, unless it’s Tues, Thursday or Sunday — then he should be Gregory Peck; he they can have it all).

    So we’re not supposed to notice that they value signal for the benefit of their social circle, while preening for an able bodied man who understands the proper use of a truck bed on Satire’s night.

    Liked by 1 person

  45. BuenaVista says:

    Saturday night


  46. SFC Ton says:

    LOL been thinking about trolling dating sites

    The girls and I get a huge laugh out of reading profiles

    Liked by 1 person

  47. I was just thinking of trolling dating sites, too! We are all missing out on some good entertainment. maybe we could start a blog where we all share our responses. egads. Too much!!! Wow, I didn’t want to bother counting, but how many times did she use “I” in that one sided manifesto? I think, “does this ever work?” Is a good question. 😛


  48. BV you should ask her how many cats she has?!?! Lol

    Liked by 1 person

  49. Yoda says:

    has knowledge and opinions about world events. Someone who is comfortable and secure with who he is

    Captures the situation perfectly this does.
    What she brings that wants he does?


  50. Yoda says:


    According to Right Wing News, a few n’er do wellers on 4chan had a brilliant idea: see if they could convince people to, “publicly piss/sh*t their pants in the name of ‘Equality?’”

    For these types of things to work, pranksters start a hashtag usually by attaching it to other well trafficked ones, then the intended marks take it from there.

    #PissForEquality is not first outlandish hashtag used to successfully troll self-described feminists. Last year, 4chan started the #EndFathersDay hashtag, but with even better trollistic success. Professor Jacobson wrote:

    There is a strange lack of connection of so many progressive manias to reality, that it’s hard to know what is real or not. Even for progressives

    Liked by 2 people

  51. Yoda says:

    The older women of the church got wind of this, and put up a big fuss. Eventually after a show trial, Joseph of Jackson was booted from the church.

    Notice that older women it was.
    Younger women enjoyed the attention they did.
    Why unhappy the older women were?

    Liked by 2 people

  52. Yoda says:

    someone who believes that we have a responsibility to make the world a better place (in whatever way we can)

    A good sentiment this might be.
    But truly deliver on it she does?


  53. Yoda says:

    Late last month, a report from U.N. Women called on national governments to enforce censorship of the internet. It cited the worst research from the worst of the 1980s and 1990s conservative panics over obscene content in entertainment to make its case. One of the attendees, Anita Sarkeesian, sought to define comments like “You suck” and “You’re a liar” as “harassment.”

    In the following week, activists tried to draw a link between a mass-murderer in Oregon and the anonymous imageboard 4chan. They argued that violence proved the need for more draconian moderation of websites, with appointed elites monitoring and censoring the content of ordinary posters.

    This weekend, Breitbart senior editor Milo Yiannopoulos and Rebel Media broadcaster Lauren Southern were escorted out of a feminist “SlutWalk” by police officers. Their crime had been asking questions like “Do you believe in rape culture?” and “Should victims always be believed?”

    Just a few weeks earlier, political commentator Steven Crowder was ejected from a similar event. Like Southern and Yiannopoulos, he had done little more than ask questions before he was asked to leave.

    Meanwhile, in Canada, a man is on trial for criminal harassment after he disagreed with feminist activists. His tweets, the worst of which was “methinks the lady doth snark too much,” are alleged to have made the activists “fear for their safety.”

    Left-wing identity politics has always had an authoritarian streak. Feminism in particular has betrayed a penchant for censorship since at least the 1980s. But that censorship was the product of a serious ideological debate, between the sex-positive and sex-negative wings of the movement.

    This new censorship is different: it’s a panicky, desperate attempt to silence anyone who disagrees, and it doesn’t just come from feminism, but from the whole of the authoritarian Left. But why is it happening now?

    The answer is simple: identity politics is in crisis. At the popular level, it is being rejected by an increasingly overwhelming majority of the population. Meanwhile, at the academic level, the old 1960s theories that long sustained left-wing radicalism are on their last legs.

    Feminism is a useful example. Even among women, support for the ideology is at an all-time low. 82 per cent of U.S. women do not identify as feminist. Although it is still beloved by establishment media and political elites, the widespread public distaste for the ideology as it exists today is clear to see.

    Popular uprisings such as GamerGate demonstrate the scale of public pushback against the worst elements of the movement, and comments from members of the public under any article by a mainstream feminist on the web are typically a mix of frustration, astonishment, and ridicule. Little wonder that “don’t read the comments” has become a feminist meme.

    In the academy, the intellectual foundations of left-wing identity politics are being quietly but surely chipped away. For thirty years, the Left has based its world view on the idea that all inequalities are caused by social conditioning. According to this picture, “achievement gaps” between social groups, such as the gap between men and women in STEM fields, are caused by the social environment rather than natural inclinations.

    This is why the modern footsoldiers of identity politics are so keen to tackle “micro-aggressions,” or subconscious bigotry. They really believe that casual remarks in everyday conversations are part of the root cause of inequality.

    But the theory is long out of date. It is now ten years since Steven Pinker’s The Blank Slate blew apart the consensus on social conditioning. Pinker’s book was the crest of a rising tide of thinkers and cognitive scientists who believed that humans had evolved instincts and evolved differences, just like other animals, and were not mere products of their social surroundings.

    The evidence has proven hard to refute. For example, studies of twins raised in adoptive households show that they remain almost identical, even when they are separated and raised in completely different environments. Studies of male and female babies show the beginnings of gender differences long before any social conditioning takes place.


    Liked by 2 people

  54. Yoda says:

    Not to know this they do desire,


    A young, female ‘No Borders’ activist working in a migrant camp on the France-Italy border remained silent about her gang rape by Sudanese migrants for over a month because “the others asked me to keep quiet.”


  55. Spawny Get says:

    Joseph of Jackson upset the older birds…likely because he was enabling the older single men getting together with younger women. This was a threat to the sucker supply for the older women.

    Just a guess.

    More maturer women can be mighty upset when they see a viable guy for them who gets a younger woman instead. For multiple reasons. Can’t fight the fact that men find fertility attractive…even when they don’t actually want kids.

    Liked by 1 person

  56. Yoda says:

    Joseph of Jackson’s guys young they were.
    Complaining women much older they would be.
    Perhaps embarrassed by the ease with which these men “got the girls” they were

    Liked by 2 people

  57. I still say the old biddys should have been singing his praises! Better these girls fall for good men who are marriage minded than for Joe Squalor. Silly. But I know, they were reacting via feels and defending the FI rather than logic.

    Liked by 2 people

  58. Spawny Get says:

    Moving beyond the FI to MT…interesting


  59. Yoda says:

    Like Degoba this thread has become


  60. Darth Maul says:

    You really need to learn how to spell, short stuff.


  61. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    The woman described by BV will likely get all she wants from internet dating. For some reason, power in that sphere has shifted to women. For them, what is difficult can be done immediately and the impossible takes a little longer.
    I wouldn’t find reading profiles humeorous. I have already done enough of that. What I am finding difficult is overcoming my disgust of dating websites longf enough to delete my accounts.

    It was definitely older women who got Joseph of Jackson kicked out. I still can’t understand why. They couldn’t have liked the status quo, in which nothing was happening between the chrch boys and girls.I’d speculae something nasty but, it would still be speculation.

    I have to wonder about these SJWs. Sweeping a gang rape under the carpet?

    I really don’t know what to do or think anymore. Hiding in the cave seems like such a good idea.

    Liked by 1 person

  62. Dragonfly says:

    Farm Boy! Love this post! I actually did a post this morning on the largely the same topic, calling out how our churches specifically are crippling Christian men in their dating life, and in their future marriages. Check it out… I’d love to hear what you think about it or any pointers if i’m off or wrong about it somewhere…. http://girlwithadragonflytattoo.com/2015/10/07/men-dont-waste-your-20s-misunderstanding-women-what-they-want/

    I need to add in the links to the studies… did it too fast while baby was sleeping, but I’ll go back in and edit.

    Liked by 4 people

  63. Farm Boy says:

    The woman described by BV will likely get all she wants from internet dating. For some reason, power in that sphere has shifted to women. For them, what is difficult can be done immediately and the impossible takes a little longer.

    I think that you are overstating the case Fuzzie Bear. Women might have an advantage in online dating, but they surely do not always get what they want. Usually it is much less.

    Liked by 4 people

  64. Dragonfly says:

    ^Yes, the few that I know that have tried online dating have struggled with it. One even took a seminar class on how to online date better – things like how to create a better profile, etc.

    So it must not be that easy for them either.

    Liked by 1 person

  65. Dragonfly says:

    FuzzieWuzzie… it was the older women who were the wives of the elders who led the church in leadership and direction. The women were apparently the real leaders, as they were able to lead through the neck of their husbands (or so has said Anonymous Reader who remembers it… this makes it sound like some tale from LOTR). So these young men that had so much influence over the young women were a threat to the leadership of their beta husbands, which meant that they were a threat to their (the wives) being able to control things.

    I might be wrong, but I believe that is how Anonymous Reader recently related it on Rollo’s blog.

    Liked by 4 people

  66. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Agout online dating, the gals that I kept contact with all did Ok. There was one that set hard conditions and she found someone in a year.

    I didn’t know that they were taliking about this over at Rollo’s. What was said at SSM’s was that the older women were worried that the church boys would sweet talk the church girls into hanky panky. They were afraid that Game was that powerful.
    My gut tells me that they were a bunch of killjoys. What would be so bad if a few of them started seeing each other and got serious?

    Liked by 1 person

  67. @ dragonfly now that makes sense why the old biddys were upset, it was more about THEM and their power than the young girls. Sad! 😦 they should be encouraging the young women, not worried about themselves. Kinda like feminists, now that I think about it…

    Liked by 4 people

  68. SFC Ton says:

    Old biddys are anti hankie pankie since it isn’t there hankie pankie

    In general old women are the worst. Butt sore their smp value is gone? That they never landed the great White whale of AF and BB?

    Liked by 1 person

  69. SFC Ton says:

    Also in this day and all an old biddy is likely to have done her share of cook sampling back in the day

    Few things in life more unstable then cock samplers and few people more joyless then reformed cock samplers

    Anyrate, lots of valid reasons the old gals disliked JoJ actions

    Liked by 1 person

  70. Yoda says:

    few people more joyless then reformed cock samplers

    Better to have never sampled at all it is?


  71. Farm Boy says:

    I wonder what the most joyless type of woman there is…

    Rabid Feminist?
    Alpha Widow in a sexless marriage?

    Liked by 1 person

  72. Yoda says:

    A woman who makes sammiches not it would be.


  73. Mrs. Yoda says:

    Agree with Yoda I do


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: