Recently commenter BuenaVista stated,
A man toying with a woman or rejecting a woman is revealing her sexual impulses and the manner in which she has trivialized her sexual activity. For it is truly trivial. This is incompatible with the image of the ‘strong empowered woman’ who practices ‘amazing empowered sex’. You know, while blotto at 11 in the morning at the tailgate before the football game with the older brother of some guy she just met at 8 in the same morning.
Now, any man who reveals that behavior, or in fact reveals and illustrates it (as in the case of Mattress Girl, whose illiterate and vulgar pleas for her vague male friend to do her up the ass were publicly shared) must go down.
This just happened in Asheville, NC. Two guys own a coffee shop and they kept an anonymized record of their PUA adventures; they tracked their ‘notch count’ and all the other bullshit that the keyboard lotharios track at Heartiste or RoK. Apparently they were pretty good at picking up the hippy chicks that predominate in Asheville. Their behavior was tacky, as was their belief that should should brag about it — if anonymously. (I suggest that if you’re going to be an asshole, Asshole Game works better if you don’t publish your playbook on the internet.)
Someone outed them and the entire male and female feminist apparatus descended on them. I think they’ll have to sell their shop and leave town. They had a loan to open a second shop and the lender was trying to rescind it. Protesters lined the sidewalk in front of their business and warned everyone to stay away from the heinous sexual abusers. (I am not current on this story, maybe they’re dead by now, or at least working for free at the LGBTQ Recreation Center.)
Now let’s think about this for a moment. Were they attacked because they had sex with a stream of willing strange women who wanted to have sex? Yes, they were. But was it truly that or was it because they held up a mirror to current female sexual impulses and behavior? I think it was very clearly the latter that made them the target of the mob. Because if women write an anonymized blog about their random sexual experiences with a train of willing boys, they’re “cool.” But these men reveal that they’re boffing happy willing chicks in the restroom of their coffee shop, an hour after meeting them, and they are “abusers.” There are no accusations of forced sex here, just claims that the women are victims because … because … they got what they wanted?
Don’t hold up a mirror to modern feminism unless you’re ready for the long knives. The same thing is happening to anyone willing to publicly discuss the Planned Parenthood videos about their body parts salvage yard action
A few years ago at Sunshine Mary’s old blog, regular commenter Joseph of Jackson told his story. He was attending a church and was the leader of a single men’s group there. He paid money to attend a PUA seminar, and came back with considerable skills. He tested these new skills out, and somewhat surprisingly they worked very well. He started teaching these skills in a G rated movie manner (no pump ‘n dump, use them as a path to marriage) to his single men’s group. Amazingly the young women of the church started responding positively to these young men, when before they all but ignored them. The older women of the church got wind of this, and put up a big fuss. Eventually after a show trial, Joseph of Jackson was booted from the church. The men of his single’s group all left with him.
What was the primary objection? It was one that nobody could articulate, but everybody could vaguely sense. Even though the young men were not sinning in the church’s view, they had to go. For they exposed what BuenaVista discussed above. With the correct buttons pushed, women can be easy lays. And men in general are not supposed to know the buttons.
Blogger Julien O’Dea wrote a post about what the real problem was. Quoting from his post,
“I think women lie to men about what really turns women on, perhaps because they are doing what Steve Moxon has written about. They are “policing the hierarchy”. They don’t want ordinary men to know, because knowledge is power. They would prefer that only elite men know these things and preferably that they know them intuitively. If every clueless guy is told the truth, it means that a man has been helped, who in the eyes of many women does not deserve to know. Women just expect men to know without being told.”
Basically, if every schlub knew the tricks to pushing women’s buttons, then how would they pick out the “real men” who tinglate them? And we can’t have that? Or can we?