Group-Bias (a.k.a. In-group Bias):
Women are automatically biased in favor of their own gender; men are not:
“Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: why do women like women more than men like men?” In Experiment 1, only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem (A. G. Greenwald et al., 2002), revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic own group preference.
Some women I know are fully aware that they have group-bias and battle against it. However, I don’t think I’ve ever met a woman who lacks it completely.
When reading “woman” or “women” on this post, please note that I mean most but not all women. This post is about the ones who applaud their own group-bias, or are too biased to know that they have it.
Group-biased women can neither tolerate equality nor understand it.
Woman is not designed to hold power over Man:
Her natural group-bias should be a clear sign to all of us that Woman is not designed to hold power. Her group-bias blinds her to her own gender-bigotry. In the absence of natural checks, it will “entitle” her to abuse her power with a witless hypocrisy that leaves men speechless. It traps her in a state of subjective gender-centricity, incapable of true self-scrutiny. She is a loose cannon. She could bring civilization down, and not have the foggiest clue that she is responsible for the collapse. Rather than look critically at her own gender, she automatically blames men.
There is no precedent in nature for a successful society of subjugated men. The unfettered female group-bias imposed on society by feminism is unnatural. Consequently, men are not prepared for it. On the contrary, they naturally feel gratified to see the advancement of women, because it indicates that men themselves have done well. In nature women don’t do well unless men have done well.
The Bogeyman Patriarchy:
Precious few women will ever realize that feminism was only possible for women whose men had done well. Specifically, straight white males had done well. Feminists simply cannot abide this fact. They hate it so much they have made this the cornerstone of their ideology: Straight white males (the hated Patriarchy) are, they say, responsible for everything that’s wrong with the world. Should feminists allow their obsession with the patriarchy to die, Feminism will die along with it.
But group-bias keeps it alive.
Once Feminism built up enough steam, it was able to roll men with ease. It didn’t require any special intellect or talent to achieve this. Nature did it for them. On the road to “equality”, the natural inclination of men to look favorably on women, and of women to look unfavorably on men, made a feminist takeover a cinch.
Feminism is Unnatural:
It’s like forcing political correctness onto a community of zebras and sheep on the veldt. All the rules will be designed to artificially enable the sheep to compete. In the absence of such rules the zebra will be first to the best grass every time. More and more rules are made to prevent the zebra being better at anything, especially in areas where he is clearly superior – such as awareness of predators and reacting to danger. The rules bring it all down to the sheep’s level, thus threatening the survival of the entire community.
(IRL I’m a farmer. I’m also a hunter, inter alia. I’ve seen it first hand: sheep are particularly stupid animals when confronted by danger.)
Feminism removed all constraints on the natural group-bias of women. Meanwhile, there is no counterbalancing group-bias in men. If anything, Man is biased in favor of Woman. By nature he competes to provide the best protection and well-being for women and children, not for his fellow man.
“Equality” is open slather for women to abuse their share of power.
Her Equality is His Inequality:
Women are hellbent on validating the argument that equality with them cannot work, that they actually can’t tolerate equality. Their unbalanced group-bias ensures that they won’t settle for an equal situation. In their minds, a bias in their favor is equality. Make no mistake about it, their much-vaunted genderless society will be a female society in which maleness has no place.
A man struggles to understand the feminist determination to abolish his gender. He is stunned by the avalanche of blame and scorn a woman brings down on his head. She believes she is more compassionate and caring than men. This belief fits in very conveniently with her own group-bias, allowing a callous little bigot to pose as an empathetic saint.
Notwithstanding all this, a lot of men continue to be biased in her favor, and strive to impress her by increasing her privilege. These men are just as flawed as feminists. Unbalanced group-bias dooms equality to failure.
Men are subjected to endless fetters on their maleness and their lives – placed on them by women and men. Are women subjected to the same? Not likely. Women are incapable of placing fetters on themselves. They insist on a total lack of self-constraint. Their group-bias dictates that only men need fetters.
What’s to be done?
The rest is little more than a pipe dream, but I’ll say it anyway:
If we must have rules to enforce equality, let’s start by confronting the biases in:
- the media
- government expenditure
- DV and rape stats
- burden of proof
- excuses for longevity
- affirmative action
- the draft
Let’s shift Equality out of the realm of doctrine and absolutes into the realm of the specific and the practical. In other words, let’s shift it away from Feminism completely. And let’s face up to the group-bias in women. It’s real.
Women, a so-called minority, outnumber men in feminist countries. In a democracy, need they ever change? Hell no. I’m pissing in the wind. As I said, it’s a pipe dream (metaphor intended).
I believe this much: of all the many ailments of the sick SMP, female group-bias is the disease at the heart.
The above gripes don’t apply to the rare creatures we call unicorns, a significant percentage of whom are here. I’m fortunate to know more than a couple of them myself, IRL.
My gripe is with the bigots out there.