Group-Bias (a.k.a. In-group Bias):

Women are automatically biased in favor of their own gender; men are not:

Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: why do women like women more than men like men?”  In Experiment 1, only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem (A. G. Greenwald et al., 2002), revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic own group preference.

Some women I know are fully aware that they have group-bias and battle against it. However, I don’t think I’ve ever met a woman who lacks it completely.

When reading “woman” or “women” on this post, please note that I mean most but not all women. This post is about the ones who applaud their own group-bias, or are too biased to know that they have it.

Group-biased women can neither tolerate equality nor understand it.


Woman is not designed to hold power over Man:

Her natural group-bias should be a clear sign to all of us that Woman is not designed to hold power. Her group-bias blinds her to her own gender-bigotry. In the absence of natural checks, it will “entitle” her to abuse her power with a witless hypocrisy that leaves men speechless. It traps her in a state of subjective gender-centricity, incapable of true self-scrutiny. She is a loose cannon. She could bring civilization down, and not have the foggiest clue that she is responsible for the collapse. Rather than look critically at her own gender, she automatically blames men.

There is no precedent in nature for a successful society of subjugated men. The unfettered female group-bias imposed on society by feminism is unnatural. Consequently, men are not prepared for it. On the contrary, they naturally feel gratified to see the advancement of women, because it indicates that men themselves have done well. In nature women don’t do well unless men have done well.


The Bogeyman Patriarchy:

Precious few women will ever realize that feminism was only possible for women whose men had done well. Specifically, straight white males had done well. Feminists simply cannot abide this fact. They hate it so much they have made this the cornerstone of their ideology: Straight white males (the hated Patriarchy) are, they say, responsible for everything that’s wrong with the world. Should feminists allow their obsession with the patriarchy to die, Feminism will die along with it.

But group-bias keeps it alive.

Once Feminism built up enough steam, it was able to roll men with ease. It didn’t require any special intellect or talent to achieve this. Nature did it for them. On the road to “equality”, the natural inclination of men to look favorably on women, and of women to look unfavorably on men, made a feminist takeover a cinch.


Feminism is Unnatural:

It’s like forcing political correctness onto a community of zebras and sheep on the veldt. All the rules will be designed to artificially enable the sheep to compete. In the absence of such rules the zebra will be first to the best grass every time. More and more rules are made to prevent the zebra being better at anything, especially in areas where he is clearly superior – such as awareness of predators and reacting to danger. The rules bring it all down to the sheep’s level, thus threatening the survival of the entire community.

(IRL I’m a farmer. I’m also a hunter, inter alia. I’ve seen it first hand: sheep are particularly stupid animals when confronted by danger.)

Feminism removed all constraints on the natural group-bias of women. Meanwhile, there is no counterbalancing group-bias in men. If anything, Man is biased in favor of Woman. By nature he competes to provide the best protection and well-being for women and children, not for his fellow man.

“Equality” is open slather for women to abuse their share of power.


Her Equality is His Inequality:

Women are hellbent on validating the argument that equality with them cannot work, that they actually can’t tolerate equality. Their unbalanced group-bias ensures that they won’t settle for an equal situation. In their minds, a bias in their favor is equality. Make no mistake about it, their much-vaunted genderless society will be a female society in which maleness has no place.

A man struggles to understand the feminist determination to abolish his gender. He is stunned by the avalanche of blame and scorn a woman brings down on his head. She believes she is more compassionate and caring than men. This belief fits in very conveniently with her own group-bias, allowing a callous little bigot to pose as an empathetic saint.

Notwithstanding all this, a lot of men continue to be biased in her favor, and strive to impress her by increasing her privilege. These men are just as flawed as feminists. Unbalanced group-bias dooms equality to failure.

Men are subjected to endless fetters on their maleness and their lives – placed on them by women and men. Are women subjected to the same? Not likely. Women are incapable of placing fetters on themselves. They insist on a total lack of self-constraint. Their group-bias dictates that only men need fetters.


What’s to be done?

The rest is little more than a pipe dream, but I’ll say it anyway:

If we must have rules to enforce equality, let’s start by confronting the biases in:

  • education
  • the media
  • health
  • debt
  • government expenditure
  • bureaucracy
  • institutions
  • divorce
  • DV and rape stats
  • “justice”
  • burden of proof
  • punishment
  • homelessness
  • suicide
  • excuses for longevity
  • quotas
  • affirmative action
  • the draft

Let’s shift Equality out of the realm of doctrine and absolutes into the realm of the specific and the practical. In other words, let’s shift it away from Feminism completely. And let’s face up to the group-bias in women. It’s real.



Women, a so-called minority, outnumber men in feminist countries. In a democracy, need they ever change? Hell no. I’m pissing in the wind. As I said, it’s a pipe dream (metaphor intended).

I believe this much: of all the many ailments of the sick SMP, female group-bias is the disease at the heart.



The above gripes don’t apply to the rare creatures we call unicorns, a significant percentage of whom are here. I’m fortunate to know more than a couple of them myself, IRL.

My gripe is with the bigots out there.

Posted in Cill, Feminism, Gynocentrism
  1. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    “What is to be done?”
    I think the answer is simply male non-participation in society. Feminism has its hooks into everything and all institution are its servant.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I had not really understood the in group bias like this. So female leaders, say queen Victoria or Elizabeth, did that work bc of their in bias for fellow English? Or were their regimes pro woman?


  3. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    It never ceases to amaze me how they can enlist the help of institutions through the expedient of telling easily exposed lies.

    Disagree witha feminist gets you six months in jail. Meanwhile Julie Bindel cn call for putting all men in concentration camps using a Pulitzer winning newspaper for a platfoem.

    Do we want to continue to contribute to a society where this is normal and acceptable?

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Cill says:

    Fuzzy, male non-participation would work if enough men did it. I can’t see them combining against women the way women have done against men. I wish they would, but they lack a group-bias of their own. Also, in a democracy they are outnumbered and out-voted. I certainly don’t want to continue to contribute to a society where criticism of feminism is an offence. I can organize my affairs so that my assessable income is below the tax threshold.

    Bloom, the in-bias of women is in favor of their own gender and against men. Elizabeth I and Victoria wouldn’t have considered using female group-bias against men. There was no modern feminist mentality in their day. Female group-bias did exist (“sugar and spice and all things nice”) but the Feminist doctrine of the patriarchy hadn’t been invented yet. The male / female checks and balances were still in place back then.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    While men don’t have an in group preference, we do know when we are getting the short end. It is already happening and it is not in the least bit organized.

    T add to what Cill said, feminism can only exist in a wealthy society. It’s expensive to prop up all this affirmative action and “equlity”.

    Thirdly, I am still trying to recover from the Untied Nations listening to Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn air their greivances.

    Liked by 6 people

  6. Yoda says:

    Many MGTOWs I have seen.
    Everywhere they are.
    But call themselves MGTOWs not

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Yoda says:

    Thirdly, I am still trying to recover from the Untied Nations listening to Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn air their greivances

    Victim group I belong to,
    therefore I am.


  8. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Who knows what the UN will grant them? However, what they are asking for is censorship. That is censorship for men.


  9. Cill says:

    “Many MGTOWs I have seen”.

    As I’ve said before, I work with problem young men and make them proficient at farming and building and welding and mechanics and plumbing and electrical and butchering and tanning . Many of them have looked at me as a MGHOW and liked what they saw. I read them posts from Spawnyspace. I am a MGTOW creator.

    I started to count these MGTOW once, and gave up at 40 although there are a lot more than that.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    You are doing good work. Somebody stole their “can do”. You’re giving it back. That has no price.
    However, what I think Yoda is talking about is all the guys out there who know something is very wrong but, haven’t found this little corner of the internet yet.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Yoda says:


    Perhaps civilization can tolerate equality not.
    But then it truly not equality it is.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. molly says:

    Group bias is very close to group-think, eh.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    It matters not. When they get together for their hen parties, they will be very angry because the have no men to verbally bash and they won’t know where they went.
    When Harriet Harman made that joke about men clogging up all the major airports, would she laugh at the realitiy?


  14. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    We’ll tell you where the men went. 🌯 🌯 :burrio: 🐻 🙄

    Liked by 1 person

  15. molly says:

    Fuzzie! 😀

    P.S. I know where one of the men went, and it wasn’t MGTOW lol

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Cill says:

    “When Harriet Harman made that joke about men clogging up all the major airports, would she laugh at the realitiy?”
    Not when the income tax stops rolling in. That would wipe the smile from her gob.
    With no men left, which expenditure on women would she curtail first?

    Liked by 5 people

  17. Yoda says:

    With no men left, which expenditure on women would she curtail first?

    Perhaps Ms. Sarkeesian’s earings and lipstick?

    Liked by 1 person

  18. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    The first thing that would have to bbe attended to would be the trash.

    I failed with one burrito. Here 🌯
    Thank you for breakfast!

    Liked by 1 person

  19. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I should have said it earlier but, there is a parallel between group bias and think. Men are at too much of a disadvantage.

    Liked by 3 people

  20. Cillhouette says:

    Fuzzie they are really 2 sides of the same bad coin.

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Cill says:

    Fuzzy, “The first thing that would have to be attended to would be the trash.”
    I’m sitting here imagining horrible Harriet’s impotent outrage as her trash builds up on the kerb.

    Liked by 2 people

  22. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Glad to see you! Yes, same bad coin.

    I can see Harriet fuming, “I know that we kept them around for some reason.”

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Cillhouette says:

    I’m glad to see you too! Thank you. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  24. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    So you know, it has been quiet around here without the “down under” crew. All of you were missed!

    Liked by 3 people

  25. molly says:

    Fuzzie time for ➡

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Cill says:

    Well it’s 8 p.m. here and I’m feeling fine. Nothing is rotten in the state of Denmark. I have no deeds to do or promises to keep. Things are fairly good you know.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Because of all this, women are advantaged in many respects at the cost of men. They are not going to give this up. Not even if keeping it will lead to a social collapse.
    At least, Molly’s egg frying emoticon makes me happy. 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

  28. molly says:

    Sleep sound F Dubya Bear. 😀

    Liked by 2 people

  29. molly says:

    Fuzzie nods off as Unca S wakes!
    Unca S — y’there?
    (I’m mis-cheev-ee-uss tonight)

    Liked by 3 people

  30. Spawny Get says:

    Surprisingly relevant

    Liked by 5 people

  31. Cill says:

    Surprisingly relevant.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Spawny Get says:

    I know, I know. I try and stay off topic, but…despite all surprisingly-well-founded rumours to the contrary…I am only human.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. molly says:

    Unca S

    English is a phoenetic language.

    Do u say mis-cheev-ee-uss
    or miss-cheev-us
    or mischivus.
    Serious question.


  34. Spawny Get says:

    misscheevus (so, faster than the hyphens might imply, but an ee in the middle)

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Spawny Get says:

    Just had a local local guy deliver something. His accent was so infectious my purely natural reply was in the same accent…’gud marnin’

    Tarn would have squeed 😉

    It’s not pure Bristolian but there’s definite, strong similarities.

    Liked by 2 people

  36. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Spawny Get,
    I had to watch that twice. It’s real and it’s proponent has no moral compass. To add to that, it’s proponent has the full benefit and cooperation of government for proxy violence. Why would they need to consider this?

    Liked by 1 person

  37. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    If you were from Eastern Canada that would have been “Ai?”

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Spawny Get says:

    Round ear loike

    Tractor -> Tratter


    Liked by 2 people

  39. Cill says:

    Fuzzy XD


  40. Cill says:

    Okay Spawny that’s enuff. 😉
    (funny buggar)


  41. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I had trouble sleeping.

    Liked by 1 person

  42. molly says:

    Fuzzie sleep 🌯 🌯 🌯 🌯

    Liked by 1 person

  43. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Thinking about Johntheother’s video, women who would resoort to this would not do it over something they could take to the police. This would be about not calling back the next day or other percieved outrage.
    What scares me is that, from what I have heard, this could fly in Toronto.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. molly says:

    Fuzzie 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  45. molly says:

    Fuzzie should you be sleeping?
    It’s past 5:30 a.m. in your woods.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I’ll try again. Stupid heartburn. It doesn’t bug me if I am verical.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    That’s vertical. Sorry.

    Liked by 1 person

  48. molly says:

    Vertical. Better’n horizontal. I approve, F.W. Bear. 😉

    Liked by 2 people

  49. molly says:

    Fuzzie I will catch up with u tomorrow eh? Have a b-i-i-i-g sleep Fuzzie Bear.

    Liked by 1 person

  50. Cill says:

    Well, not to put too fine a point upon it, I’m fucked. See you tomorrow.

    Liked by 1 person

  51. molly says:

    Me too. Goodnight to all. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  52. Spawny Get says:

    Fuzzie, try putting a house brick under the head-end legs of the bed. You won’t notice the angle, but the acid tends to stay down in the stomach.

    Also, helps with UTIs (ladeez) and prostate irritation (menz) as well as stomach acid…a teaspoon of sodium bicarbonate in a glass of water a day. That’s what I sip at night when the acid gets playful. DON’T overdo it though as your bottom could explode (diarrhoea). IME drinking a glass / glass and a half is fine. It instantly neutralises acid.


  53. Spawny Get says:

    “(funny buggar)”

    Liked by 1 person

  54. SFC Ton says:

    Well.done Cill


  55. SFC Ton says:

    Just watched the video; anyone who disagrees with th only good moslem is a dead moslem should go to work with me for awhile


  56. Tarnished says:

    Just had a local guy deliver something. His accent was so infectious my purely natural reply was in the same accent…’gud marnin’
    This happens to me a lot. Just about any time I find myself in conversation with a foreigner, I’ll subconsciously start speaking in the same accent. Won’t even know I’m doing it til they ask if I’m from their country or someone else joins the convo and points it out. My mother says it is extremely rude to “mimic” people and bring attention to their inflections…but I don’t do it on purpose. If I visit Spawny, he’ll be allowed to knock me about the head so I keep my American accent. 😛

    Re: the actual post
    I’ve mentioned before that I use a cycle tracker app with a linked forum community. It’s quite eye-opening, the sheer amount of womenfolk going on about similar issues and the fact that there are always 2 very differently sized camps. One is pro-male/sex (15-20% estimated), the other is anti-male/sex…and, now that I’m thinking on it, the former group consists of (generally) more secular/non-Christian women which is odd but apparently to be expected.

    Constantly there are questions of “what should I do”, regarding husbands wanting more sex, finding porn on their husband’s phone/laptop, the fact their boyfriends don’t call everyday, how to get a man to notice them, if oral, anal, or even just non-missionary sex is inherently degrading, how to deal with LTR boyfriends who haven’t popped the question yet…It’s an absolute smorgasbord of modern female thoughts.

    Two weeks ago, someone posted the topic of Why Would A Woman Not Be A Feminist, with the expected malarkey of “any woman who’s not a feminist is either: an idiot, horribly misinformed, ignorant of the daily inequality she faces, or is so under the thumb of Teh Patriarchy that she’s a self-hating misogynist.” Immediately the 80% started in with their agreements, saying that feminism is the great equalizer, women who “want to be stuck in the kitchen” shouldn’t have the vote, etc.

    Most interesting point I saw though was a not-always-subtle reference to the fact non-feminist women were…wait for it…betraying the sisterhood. That solely by not agreeing with the way feminism treats men, they are *necessarily* anti-woman. The 15-20% tried to say No, we aren’t anti-woman. We just want real equality which feminism fails to deliver. We don’t dislike men either individually or in general, we don’t think we’re oppressed and they’re not, we think that issues feminists claim are entirely sex-based are actually much more intersecting, etc.

    Needless to say, the topic was closed by a moderator because it got extremely heated, with accusations of sexism and misogyny thrown about like confetti at a parade. It’s just so amazing, how the majority grouped together to gang up on the minority and, according to the comment timestamps, how quickly the conversation utterly degraded into naught but name-calling and a refusal to accept the positions of the egalitarians/non-feminists. Truly something to behold…

    Liked by 3 people

  57. Liz says:

    “Most interesting point I saw though was a not-always-subtle reference to the fact non-feminist women were…wait for it…betraying the sisterhood. That solely by not agreeing with the way feminism treats men, they are *necessarily* anti-woman. The 15-20% tried to say No, we aren’t anti-woman.”

    Yep. Now consider that once a woman is considered persona non grata in the herd, she ain’t getting in again. Persona non grata is foreva (well, unless and until she is too important to ignore, then the kissing-up starts…but this is a highly unlikely scenario). By contrast men can (generall) work together well even if they don’t like each other much. I think that’s the reason behind the group-gender bias dynamic.
    Women depend more on groups for survival anyway, coupled with the far more likely event of encountering social pariahism and exclusion from women than from men this dynamic isn’t really surprising.

    Liked by 4 people

  58. Tarnished says:

    True, Liz.
    Which is why they don’t know what to do with someone who isn’t biased, and judges people based on their individual traits rather than random shared commonalities.

    Liked by 2 people

  59. Liz says:

    Here was a blog I read for the first time this morning (this poster contributed on Dragonflygirl’s forum, which made me click on her blog).

    Entitled “I am tired of American ignorance”. It’s a pretty interesting to see the admonishment for those she views as tolerant coupled simultaneously with complete intolerance, in just a few short paragraphs. “I can tolerate anything but intolerance!!!” I’ve seen this before, but rarely so obviously and so quickly.


  60. Liz says:

    Entitled “I am tired of American ignorance”. It’s pretty interesting to see the admonishment for those she views as INtolerant coupled simultaneously with complete intolerance, in just a few short paragraphs. “I can tolerate anything but intolerance!!!”
    I’ve seen this before, but rarely so obviously and so quickly.


  61. Yoda says:

    Women do this they should,

    Liked by 1 person

  62. Yoda says:

    Sammich making therapy alleviates problem described in OP it does.
    Makes females consider males it would

    Liked by 1 person

  63. Yoda says:

    someone posted the topic of Why Would A Woman Not Be A Feminist

    Because happy wife and mother she does desire to be…

    Liked by 2 people

  64. Tarnished says:

    She does, surprisingly. If one looks at OP’s other comments/posts, one finds she is a SAHM of 3 and trying to conceive #4. She’s a…TradFem? Lol.

    Liked by 1 person

  65. Yoda says:

    Control the debate they do desire,

    On Thursday, the organization’s Broadband Commission for Digital Development released a damning “world-wide wake-up call” on what it calls “cyber VAWG,” or violence against women and girls. The report concludes that online harassment is “a problem of pandemic proportion” — which, nbd, we’ve all heard before.

    But the United Nations then goes on to propose radical, proactive policy changes for both governments and social networks, effectively projecting a whole new vision for how the Internet could work.
    Under U.S. law — the law that, not coincidentally, governs most of the world’s largest online platforms — intermediaries such as Twitter and Facebook generally can’t be held responsible for what people do on them. But the United Nations proposes both that social networks proactively police every profile and post, and that government agencies only “license” those who agree to do so. […]
    At one point toward the end of the paper, the U.N. panel concludes that “political and governmental bodies need to use their licensing prerogative” to better protect human and women’s rights, only granting licenses to “those Telecoms and search engines” that “supervise content and its dissemination.”

    he UN report, while surely well-meaning, represents a typical moral panic—a sense of crisis and fear blown far out of proportion. As with most propagators of panics, the authors of the report want to crack down on civil liberties. As Dewey explained, the report appears to be proposing a government-enforced internet censorship regime, whereby websites and social media companies would be punished if they did not agree to monitor and police offensive content to the satisfaction of the United Nations. Needless to say, this type of censorship already exists in many countries (particularly those countries with the worst records on women’s rights) but the UN Broadband Commission—nominally a proponent of a free and open internet—would apparently like to see it exported to Western democracies as well.


    Liked by 1 person

  66. Yoda says:

    Mention the word they do,

    This isn’t a decision in any sort of metaphorical sense. These men are literally cutting women out of their lives, completely. It’s not a spiritual choice—like becoming ordained as a Catholic priest—nor is it a socioeconomic problem, like Japan’s herbivore men. It is more of an ideological celibacy, one that crosses both national borders and religious divides. And the basic reason is the slow crawl toward gender equality.

    They are called Men Going Their Own Way (or MGTOW, pronounced “mig-tow”) and they have a serious problem with feminism. To them, the feminist movement has all but ruined our society, and it just doesn’t make sense to participate in the dating game because women have been, in their eyes, programmed to ruin a man’s life.



  67. Yoda says:

    I had trouble sleeping

    Bears what in this case they do?
    Fish flying in mouths?
    Picnic baskets?
    Jars of honey?

    Liked by 1 person

  68. The proposed online anti bullying laws sound a lot like anti bullying laws adopted by schools a few years ago. Outcome? It’s mostly (gasp) girls who are bullying other girls, and it’s gotten to the point that even non bullying is considered bullying. Fail.

    Liked by 1 person

  69. molly says:

    Happy happy happy HI! 🙂 Yoohoo spawny blog! 😀 I ❤ Y'ALL!!!! I’m at work already.

    n angry cop pulled me over this morning. I climbed off my bike and took off my helmet and he sorta melted. It’s my shape. Not fair, eh. I don’t wonna lose my licence for speeding tho. He let me off with a warning. Should I do this ya reckon?

    P.S. My bike isn’t made for slow. It speeds up to 140 on its own (heh heh)
    VA-ROOOOOM 😀 lol

    Liked by 3 people

  70. molly says:

    Did I say I ❤ ya?
    Some more ❤ ❤ ❤ oooxxx
    Got to work now. bye.

    Liked by 1 person

  71. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I would recommend giving Child of Ra a wide berth. Something just doesn’t add up. I have seen her previously at Deep Strength’s site.

    You got to see the “herd instinct” in action. Amazing, isn’t it?

    I have to wonder how effective the UN would be in policing the internet. There is the small matter of authority. That the fembots would ask for censorship powers on the order of Mainland China is telling. Add that to the fact that they only want to censor their opponents while they retain free speech. Ask Stephanie Guthrie in Ontario.

    You melted the policeman’s heart! What you need to do id find a vehicle that is a blast to drive at legal speeds.

    Liked by 1 person

  72. “they only want to censor their opponents while they retain free speech”

    Exactly. Not good.

    Liked by 1 person

  73. Liz says:

    Point taken, Fuzzie. Yes, Child of Ra seems to be a weird egg.
    Not sure why she’s trolling Christian forums when it’s pretty obvious that’s the one religion she can’t tolerate.

    Liked by 1 person

  74. Cill says:

    “government-enforced internet censorship”. The gaol goal is to eliminate criticism of feminism. Meanwhile the purveyors of anti-male hate shriek their vitriol from the MSM. Screw them. I won’t stop criticizing feminism.

    Liked by 1 person

  75. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    All the favors go one way with that bunch.
    I have to wonder if Facebook and Twitter were yielded to the fembots, they could talk all day to each other and we could have somewhere else to talk. I really don’t want to talk to them.

    I am glad thaqt I restrict my comments to a few sites.


  76. Cill says:

    “What you need to do id find a vehicle that is a blast to drive at legal speeds.”
    I don’t think that’s going to happen any time soon, Fuzzy.

    Liz, Fuzzy: I don’t read Christian forums so I wouldn’t know. I’m aware of feminist crap in churches though.

    Bloom “It’s mostly (gasp) girls who are bullying other girls”. Spot on.

    Fuzzy’s heartburn – too much junk food from you-know-who.

    Yoda re U.N. Broadband Commission for Digital Development. What a useless organization they are. Screw them. Again.

    I’m in a good mood. Really.

    Liked by 1 person

  77. Liz says:

    I always wear this when I drive.

    Liked by 2 people

  78. Liz says:

    Side note: Good to see you Kiwis back. 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  79. Cill says:

    Tarn, where is this linked forum community? No don’t tell me. If I visit them I’ll probably end up beating my screen to death.

    Ton, thanks.

    Spawny “Your bottom could explode”. You mean your arse could erupt?
    When the good lord invented arses he did not have “bottom” in mind. The Queen’s English includes “Arse” for good reason. “Arse” is there to be used. It’s a word a sound Englishman would enunciate with pride. A.R.S.E. Arse.


  80. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    There is a man in Roronto, Ontario who I think is scheduled for the verdict October 6th. All he did was disagree with two feminists on Twitter. I am having a hard time beliving that this travesty of justice went this far.


  81. Cill says:

    Thanks Liz. I had an interesting trip away, actually. I might tell you about it some time. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  82. Yoda says:

    There is a man in Roronto

    Distant relative of Astro you are?

    Liked by 2 people

  83. Yoda says:

    Liz looks like the Emperor she does.

    Liked by 2 people

  84. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I’ll bet that Emperor Palpatine doesn’t get pulled over either.
    I am trying to do better with typos.

    On a general note, there is so much thinly disguised hate for men coming from feminists that I wonder if Jews during the Weimar Republic had to deal with less of it than men do now?


  85. Liz says:

    “Liz looks like the Emperor she does.”

    Perhaps this is why no one stops me…or looks me in the eye! They fear the dark force.
    This outfit has also come in handy for bank robberies, and public acts of indecency. 😉

    Liked by 3 people

  86. Darth Maul says:

    I approve of everything LIz just said.

    Liked by 1 person

  87. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Public acts of indecensy??? Skinny dipping in the fountain in the center of town??
    Radio voice” “Wanted for questioning in regards to the incident, a grey striped kitten wearing a froggie helmet. Approach with caution.”

    Liked by 2 people

  88. Liz says:

    I’m not owning up to anything, Fuzzie.
    “I did not have fountain relations….”
    A kitten’s got to maintain a little mystery. 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

  89. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I just hope that that didn’t happen in a town where the police logs are published.
    “Kitten with froggie helmet still at large.”

    Liked by 1 person

  90. Cill says:

    I just listened to Spawny at 8:41 pm (re Arse). Very good.

    Liked by 1 person

  91. Cill says:

    I wear my own face for public acts of indecency. All I need is a scalp rub (or anywhere) and I erupt like a thousand aerosols on fire. Next thing you know, in every corner of the Earth a wee Cillo will be gotten begat.

    Liked by 2 people

  92. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Wee Cilloes everywhere? This could be dangerous.


  93. Cill says:

    Fuzzy, everyone (the mums and their spiritual advisers) would think it’s immaculate conception. 😉
    A gift from heaven, which has a certain ring of truth to it, when I think about it.
    The little Cillos would all be perfect, I’m sure – in appearance I mean, not behavior.

    Liked by 2 people

  94. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    I need to get busy. All those Cilloes will want bears that can walk, talk, and keep them company.


  95. Yoda says:

    New post there is


  96. Cill says:

    The trampoline bear should work wonders for a wee Cillo, I think. I reckon they’d stop whatever mischief they were about to get into, to watch and chortle happily when the ursine pate meets the turf

    Liked by 2 people

  97. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Wee Cillo needs something to hug but, this will do until then.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: