I was thinking about the chick crack topic as a natural follow-on to the previous post, when Ton got the ball rolling,
I am looking to buy an old hot rod and employees/ co owners where saying I should a corvette or BMW etc because chicks dig those cars. I laughed at thir ignorance. Later someone found a video on the YouTube about what would get more chicks attention; high end luxury car or and old T bucket hot rod. Hot rod won ( & I won $100). Ferreira etc screams pretentious ass hole to the most of women. The hot rod is a status symbol/ display of wealth but it is also fun, unique etc ie chick crack
The issue is that men of today have been deprived of much of the opportunity to demonstrate any true masculinity. As a result, they often need ways to demonstrate ersatz masculinity; that is, markers that can be interpreted by women as masculinity. First up are material possessions. Examples include pickup trucks, motorcycles, sports cars, boats, and just about any vehicle that moves fast and/or handles rough terrain. These appear to be especially effective, as they convey both money and manliness.
Next up is clothes, jewelry and the like. The two extremes would probably be the pimp and the well dressed executive type. Perhaps some with more fashion sense might chime in.
And finally, there are behaviors/attitudes. There are many different classes of this. There are pimps, thugs, PUAs, military men, etc. Sometimes it is not all an act, but often it is. In most cases it doesn’t matter, as women often are not discerning enough (or perhaps don’t even care) to determine if it real or not.
To summarize, many modern men have determined that it is easier to demonstrate markers of masculinity than the real thing. And women seem to care less. If it tingles, go for it.
P.S. NAWALT naturally applies