Dalrock hits a home run with respect to his post about child support policy,
There is a method to the madness here. These men are being imprisoned to sustain a very recent and profound social revolution. They are being imprisoned to facilitate the destruction of traditional marriage so that a new family structure, one instead based on child support, can take the place of marriage. To understand this, you need to understand the four key objectives which are being achieved by imprisoning so many men.
1) Create the illusion that unwed mothers are not in fact irresponsible welfare queens.
2) Enforce the new quota based system.
3) Facilitate the removal of the father from the home to “empower” women.
4) Dis-empower husbands and fathers in order to empower wives and mothers.
The question is why? Does it really matter to women in general to have this new empowerment? Perhaps it means that she does not have to accede to any wishes of a man. Perhaps it allows her to select (and continue selecting after motherhood) for tingles. But who suffers? Men of course. But they are expendable, so no matter. The women also suffer, though they will not admit it. But most importantly, the children suffer. And you do not want children to suffer, do you? Yet here is a public policy that is tailor made to make children suffer.
Another question is, “What were they thinking”? Pretty soon the news on this semi-stealth policy is going to get out. A critical mass in terms of understanding will be reached. And then what happens?