Three weeks from the election, our two-faced political leaders are treating voters with contempt
Worse still, while attacking the Labour Party for fiscal recklessness and unfunded spending pledges, this new NHS commitment made by Osborne is completely unfunded. Over the last 48 hours Tory MPs have gone on the airwaves stonewalling questions about how they are going to fund big election handouts. After everything they have told us about how Labour can’t be trusted with the economy, how dare they?
When the main two parties treat voters so appallingly, flagrantly lying to their faces, telling one half of the country one thing and the rest another, it is no wonder no party is close to winning a majority. We live in an age where parties devoid of principle tell people what they think they want to hear and hope they will get away with it. The problem for them is they won’t get away with it. The mess that follows whoever ends up in Number 10 after May 7th is no less than these sorry parties deserve.
So with three weeks till voting day we see that labour and conservative poll positions are not changing. They’re both in the low 30s percents. Recently all the parties seem to have found veritable, verdant, forests of money trees ready for plucking.
Labour (lefty spendaholics) are promising a spendathon ‘for investment purposes’ whilst balancing the (rest of the) budget by 2020. (See 4:19 for the scale of the spending lies. This interviewer is the hardest in the UK (Andrew Neil). He cannot get any party to talk sense.)
And as Chuka ‘chuck us ya money’ Umunna says, their competition (the Conservatives) are little better. Both parties have declared that balancing the budget is no longer a problem. The lefty howling over ‘austerity’ has worked…thing is there has been no ‘austerity’. The titanic deficit has been halved (but only because the economy has grown – QE has inflated an economic bubble).
To go back to the Breitbart quote; We live in an age where parties devoid of principle tell people what they think they want to hear and hope they will get away with it. The problem for them is they won’t get away with it.
The voters know it. All the parties are making wild spending pledges in the sure and certain knowledge that the election will result in a coalition. They will then blame the fact that their spending pledges aren’t fulfilled on their coalition partners. Cameron will walk away from the pledge of a (non-binding) referendum over membership of the EU. One that he has no desire to fulfill anyway, by blaming it on the europhile-as-a-mofo LibDems (the third main party currently experiencing the onset on rigor mortise).
People don’t believe any of the parties offer the prospect of competent management.
Still, could be worse…
What difference could that make?
Miliband’s pledge: ‘I will really try not to completely f**k Britain’
It’s not even really a joke…
LikeLiked by 1 person
At least you can vote Green for good solid sensible…wait! what?
LikeLike
LikeLike
Winston Churchill you do need.
LikeLiked by 3 people
A sonnet said this:
“Profitless usurer, why dost thou use
So great a sum of sums, yet canst not live?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
A war it is not,
http://washingtonexaminer.com/is-debbie-wasserman-schultz-backing-away-from-the-war-on-women-narrative/article/2562971
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lies here also
http://huffpost.com/ca/entry/7042732
LikeLike
Throwing goodies at voters before election is such an old trick; often happens at this side of the world too. To be fair though, in Singapore the govt that does it is supposedly conservative, so it’s not confined to leftists. It’s kinda depressing how predictable and uncreative humans in general are, can’t they at least come up with new tricks?
“Labour (lefty spendaholics) are promising a spendathon ‘for investment purposes’ “. Hah they’re telling the truth; it’s an investment for their re-election campaign.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Spawny! That’s not to be your avatar I hope.
Tin hats are one thing, but I draw the line at the Bliar of all Bliars
LikeLiked by 3 people
Oh, I have a couple of new avatars to lay on you…
LikeLiked by 1 person
From that grinning maw no truth can possibly emit.
Which means you have no new avatars to lay on me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“it’s an investment for their re-election campaign.”
And therein lies the truth…
LikeLiked by 2 people
At least when they used to lie behind our backs, we could pretend that they respected us a mite.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Well at least we’ll be spared more of those dreadful porkies from Bliar.
LikeLike
…actually that might even be an improvement, mate. There’s a certain Churchillian droop in the pig’s cheeks. Or perhaps the late Robert David Muldoon of NZ.
LikeLike
re: “we could pretend that they respected us”
lol “The fact that I cared enough to bother concocting those lies proves that my heart was in the right place.”
LikeLike
Poltroon the Kiwi? Nah mate, definitely Churchillian
LikeLike
Yes well, getting back to the post topic here, maybe this joker should “stand” for Parliament.
http://www.msn.com/en-nz/health/medical/german-man-talks-about-life-with-a-7-pound-penis/ar-AAaWn5c?ocid=iehp
Mrs Moehau Man (my perky old mum) is going through shoulder-hunching laughter here.
Heh heh heh
Yeah.
LikeLike
Yes well Spawny.
Let me see, you are
(a) Bracing yourself to let one rip
(b) Pointing at a bully’s balls
(c) An umpire with his finger up and someone else’s finger up behind him
LikeLike
Moe’s 6 pound penis link:
How much would Tony Bliar weigh?
I reckon he’d be about a 140 pound dick.
LikeLiked by 1 person
maybe this joker should “stand” for Parliament.
Rise to the challenge he could.
LikeLiked by 1 person
QE has inflated an economic bubble
The Queen has such power not.
LikeLike
A day after she declares and there are already negative ads out for Hillary? Why??
She is perfectly capable of alienating the majority of voters all by herself.
This made me feel better. Maybe, it needs to be passed around in Old Blighty so that people will have a basis for comparison.
LikeLike
“She is perfectly capable of alienating the majority of voters all by herself.”
Nicely done
LikeLike
LikeLike
Okay I’m going out. I’m keen to hear this, and will listen to it when I get back.
LikeLike
New post there is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He speaks well. I guess I shouldn’t expect him to give much detail, as he’s not going for an all-out win.
LikeLike
@ Spawny:
“Still, could be worse…”
Very true and funny.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe a changing attitude towards PC. About frigging time
LikeLike
Were any of those applauding people Press or non-UKIP supporters?
LikeLike
dunno, I think it’s just the UKIP supporters aka normal people
LikeLike
“dunno, I think it’s just the UKIP supporters aka normal people”
I think you’re right. The peremptory forefinger says so. 😉
LikeLike
You’re never going to get serious comments out of me with that avatar, mate.
LikeLike
no change there, then…’cept now it’s my avatar’s fault 🙂
LikeLike
The women are discriminated against in STEM bullshit:
https://archive.today/Vz2xA#selection-3851.0-3855.295
“National hiring audits, some dating back to the 1980s, reveal that female scientists have had a significantly higher chance of being interviewed and hired than men.”
“We ran five national experiments with these otherwise-identical female and male candidates, systematically varying their personal attributes and lifestyles in a counterbalanced design. Every time we sent a given slate of candidates to a male faculty member, we sent the same slate with sexes reversed to another male faculty member, as well as sending both slates to two female faculty members. Then we compared the faculty members’ rankings to see how hirable each candidate was, overall.
What we found shocked us. Women had an overall 2-to-1 advantage in being ranked first for the job in all fields studied. This preference for women was expressed equally by male and female faculty members, with the single exception of male economists, who were gender neutral in their preferences”
I’ve known for years that men are discriminated against in STEM. Here’s the proof.
LikeLike
Unleash the whining over the booing
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/11538044/Ukip-should-apologise-for-its-disgraceful-treatment-of-Christopher-Hope.html
Don’t miss the comments though!
LikeLike
Yep, the SJW backlash just had to happen. They’re as predictable as death and taxes.
LikeLike
” kinetiq • an hour ago
Thomson Holidays have announced that they intend to include pale skinned fat women from Bolton in their new brochures, while the next edition of GQ will feature Chavs driving Aston Martins around Monaco….to be inclusive.
Al-Jazeera has also announced that it is hiring flamboyant members of the LGBT community to front its news show Dubai or Youdie.”
BLAHAHAHA!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t concentrate on my work, I’m still laughing at bloody kinetiq the bastard…
LikeLike
UKIP should apologize for not including more nonUKIP supporters within its ranks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
JF13, well they did invite the journoscum
LikeLiked by 1 person
Spawny, every time I look at that goddam avatar I’m going to see OFFS from now on.
LikeLike
I’m going to see a bum biting thickhead in a maul, and a Ref who, seeing it right in front of his incredulous eyes, was deeply deeply disgusted.
OFFS
LikeLike
“every time I look at that goddam avatar I’m going to see OFFS from now on.”
Evil monkey don’t care, evil monkey loves the idea TBH
LikeLike
LikeLike