CAUSE 1: FEMINISM
New Zealand did what the rest of the Feminist World (Western Europe, North America and Australasia) did, and swallowed Feminism hook line and sinker. NZ did it faster and took it a bit further than other countries did.
There was a shortage of women during most of the European part of New Zealand’s history. As a result, New Zealand’s women have been at the forefront of privilege. “Shortage of women may have made them more ‘valuable’ and so more able to negotiate for social change, such as gaining the vote” (“‘Man Alone’ to ‘Woman Alone’?: New Zealand sex ratios since the mid 1800s” https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/arts/research-centres/compass/documents/New%20Zealand%20sex%20ratios%20since%20the%20mid%201800s%20(2).pdf)
New Zealand was the first country to give women the vote. By the 1980s, the woman shortage had become a woman surplus (“In 1971, a balance between women and men was reached. In each subsequent census there have been more women recorded than men. However, it was from the 1981 census onwards that the excess of women became more obvious to the wider public… we have seen an increase since the 1970s in the size of the ‘Man Drought’ in the 25-49 year age group” (“‘Man Alone’ to ‘Woman Alone’?: New Zealand sex ratios since the mid 1800s)
However, the extending of privileges to women continued unabated. Now, for example, New Zealand is ranked the best country for women in the workplace: http://qz.com/60541/new-zealand-ranked-the-best-country-for-women-in-the-workplace/
As is the case in all parts of the Feminist World, New Zealand is biased in favor in women in Education, the Media, the Law, Welfare, Health, and HR departments. The same biases throughout the Feminist World have produced the ubiquitous, entitled Princess of today. We know that already. But what about the New Zealand Princess’s dubious claim to fame, that of being the world’s most promiscuous woman? Where did that come from?
CAUSE 2: MEN
Did I really type that? Men are the reason for the “Promiscuous” in “PPP”? Yes I did.
The Crew Arises From The Bias Favoring Girls in Education
“There is a ‘total’ man drought and then, as a subset, an ‘educational’ man drought, which is far stronger than the total man drought. “ The New Zealand ‘man drought’: Is it real, what are its causes, and what are the implications for partnering?“: http://callister.co.nz/nz-man-drought.pdf
The “crew” that I described in the earlier posts originated in universities. The crew is a group of women who work as a pack to hunt men and obtain sex. The crew and its hookups are the Sexual Market Place (SMP) for the PPP. The “crew” replaces dating. In the crew, a woman has safety in numbers and is among familiar female companions. The shortage of men in universities meant that “men’s wants” became the rules of the hunt. I believe the promiscuity of the PPP is an unintended consequence of the bias in favor of girls in education.
I remember my days in university well. My pre-MGHOW days. How could I forget? We males were in high demand.
The Crew and What Men Want
(a) Men want sex without the cost and hassle of dating.
In “Dirty Money: The Economics of Sex and Love” Marina Adshade explains it:
There are 130 female students for every 100 male students.
“Although you might think that fewer men means that women are having fewer relationships because there’s a shortage of men, when we look at the evidence, the shortage of men on college campuses is actually increasing promiscuity… In the past if a man wanted a woman to sleep with him he would have to at least take her on a date or something like that. Now that it’s so much more competitive, they don’t even need to do that, they just need to send a text message.” In the case of New Zealand at least, more often than not it’s the woman who approaches the man for a hookup.
So the crew is giving men what they want.
The crew expects men to bypass all the interaction during which the woman could assess the possibility of sex with a man. The crew frowns on dating activities. From the moment of hookup, sex is expected by both sexes. Men are avoiding all the angst and expense and uncertainties of dating.
(b) Men want freedom from female pressure to progress a relationship into LTR or marriage.
There’s no such goal as a meaningful long term relationship for the PPP. It’s wham bang thank you man instead.
Again, the crew is giving men what they want.
Words Straight from the PPPs’ Mouths:
That men are getting what they want is borne out by the second PPP video, where Janet McIntyre interviews the men as well as the women. Here’s a transcript of part of the “PPPs’ Alphas” video (my comments are in bold between square brackets):
Blond Woman: “I don’t know if you girls will agree, but I think it would be really strange if someone came up to you sober and said ‘I’d really like to take you to dinner’. I’d be so… I’d be like ‘What’?” [face shows disgust] “… I’d be really suspicious… I mean how do people get together in New Zealand? Usually though a drunken score.”
[So she wants Drunken Score, not dating please. Men are spared the cost of dinner. The casual wham bam of drunken behavior is preferred]
McIntyre : “So if drinking is the means to the end, what is it [you] are actually seeking: Pleasure? Empowerment? Something else?”
Blond Woman: “Drunken score because I wanted to feel ‘wanted’. The actual physical side of sex on those occasions wouldn’t come into it.” [No mention of dating, romance, getting to decide if a relationship should go further. She expects sex, regardless of what else is going on in her head]
Thin woman: “One night stand sex is really, you know, phenomenal sex… A lot of it is a desire for affirmation, a desire to feel desirable.” [A one-night-stand stranger can affirm you better than could a man who knows you well. Just what he wants: sex with no strings]
BLAME THE PPPs’ ALPHA?
I’ve already said what I think of the PPPs’ Alphas: https://spawnyspace.wordpress.com/2015/01/25/who-is-the-alpha-for-the-ppps/
They are not Alphas among men. The original PPPs’ Alphas started getting the action from women at universities for the simple reason that they were men at universities. I don’t blame them.
The PPP of NZ Today:
The phenomenon of the crew originated at university, then spread. Women decided they liked the concept. Having acquired a taste for one crew, a woman may join several more. The women are the crew, the hunters.
Crews originated in university as the most effective way for the women to hunt for the scarce men. As hunters do, the crew adapted to the ways of the prey in order to stalk them effectively. The crew became the finishing school of the PPP by injecting the “P” for “Promiscuous” into “PPP”. This model, the crew as an effective stalking group and finishing school of the PPP, extended beyond the universities. Which gives us the PPP of NZ today.