Cill’s note #1: My 19 year old cousin Molly wanted to write this post. Although she is brilliant, words are not her strong suit. She asked me to take her draft and reword it, which I have done.
Here is the first thing:
Men are fairly accurate and realistic about their ratings in the SMP. They rate approximately 50% of women to be average or above. Women are inaccurate and unrealistic, judging a mere 20% of men to be average or above. A woman of average appeal thinks she competes for men within the top 20%. In a scale of 1 to 10, a woman of 5 thinks she’s on a par with a man of 8. Women are out of whack to the extent of 160% (80 / 50). That.Is.Huge. This phenomenon is so well known, it can be verified with a simple search on the internet.
This female wackiness is not a mere aberration. It is universal and inherent. It is an extreme lack of grip on reality, a potentially fatal flaw. It shows that women are manifestly unfit to be the arbiters of relationships, sex, the SMP, rape, DV, social justice, or morality. It reveals an essential biological reason for men and throws it into startling relief. Women are unhinged. Humanity cannot survive without the rational influence of men. Figuratively speaking, women carry the extinction gene and men have hitherto prevented the extinction from occurring. I am saying the wackiness does not stop at the SMP. It goes right across the board and explains everything from hypergamy to the false rape syndrome.
I chanced upon Bloom’s “Is Commitment Phobia Real?” http://notesfromaredpillgirl.com/2014/12/16/is-commitment-phobia-real/
“Men also have a much harder time getting a woman with a SMP value equal to (or above) their own, the women they want to commit to, because those women are likely aiming for guys above their SMP.
Then it gets even trickier. Some men, those at the top of the SMP scale, with a SMP value of 8 plus, are in such demand that they can almost literally have their pick EXCEPT with female 8s and above.”
This brings me to the second thing:
[Cill’s note #2: I need to explain here that Molly is described by people who see her as “Absolutely Gorgeous”, “The Perfect 10”, “Divinely Beautiful Woman” and so on. It’s always an awkward point to make, but it has to be made. Otherwise an essential aspect behind all of her expressions will be lost. In terms of its impact on her it’s like an hilarious affliction, which she handles in a resigned and often uproarious way]
Where does this leave the women who rate at 10 on the scale? Does she too over-rate herself, or does the wackiness stop at her? There are two sides to the coin after all. On one side is the over-rating of herself. On the other side is the under-rating of men. Does she underrate the men who rate at 10 so much that they are to her no more attractive than a 3? At her level, does a levelling-out occur, and qualities of character transcend the supposedly ubiquitous tingles. Can character itself become the source of the tingles? What effect will this have on the gene base of the tribe/group within which she selects?
[Cill’s note #3: Please bear in mind that she wrote her draft before she saw my note #2 or any of my other notes. ]